Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:09:51.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient finite element dynamic response of laminated composite stiffened shell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Mukhopadhyay  and
S. Goswami
M. Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval ArchitectureIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpur, India
S. Goswami
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval ArchitectureIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpur, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper uses the conventional nine-noded Lagrangian element for studying transient linear response analysis of composite stiffened shells. An improved version of the stiffener modelling has been used in which the stiffener can be placed anywhere inside the element. For the first time, concentric or eccentric stiffeners have been used for composite stiffened shells for solving the transient dynamic response of these structures. These are not available in existing commercial packages. Different types of time dependent loading such as short duration air-blast loading, suddenly applied uniformly distributed step loading and sinusoidally harmonic loading have been considered in this paper. The results of stiffened composite cylindrical shells and doubly curved shells with different boundary conditions and various laminate orientations have been presented for eccentric stiffeners. Parametric studies considering different variables have also been carried out.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 996 , July 1996 , pp. 223 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sinha, G. and Mukhopadhyay, M. Transient dynamic response of arbitrary stiffened plates and shells by the finite element method, J Vibr and Acou, Trans, ASME, 1995, 117, (1), pp 11–16.Google Scholar
2. Reddy, J.N. Dynamic (transient) analysis of layered anisotropic .composite material plates, lnt J Num Meth Eng, 1983, 19, pp 237– 255.Google Scholar
3. Chao, W.C. and Reddy, J.N. Analysis of laminated composite shells using a degenerated 3-D element, lnt J Num Meth Eng, 1984, 20, pp 1991–2007.Google Scholar
4. Mukhopadhyay, M. and Samal, S.K. Transient response analysis of plated structures, lnt J of Struct, 1990, 10, (1), pp 55–73 Google Scholar
5. Mukherjee, A. and Mukhopadhyay, M. Finite element analysis of stiffened plates under time varying loads. Proc Twentieth Midwestern Mech Conf, Purdue University, Indiana, 1987, pp 666-672.Google Scholar
6. Newmark, N.M. A method of computation for structural dynamics, J Eng Mech Divn, Proc ASCE, 1959, 85, pp 67–94.Google Scholar
7. Goswami, S. and Mukhopadhyay, M. Finite element analysis of laminated composite stiffened shell, J Reinf Plas Comp, 1994, 13, (7), pp 574–616.Google Scholar
8. Mukherjee, A. and Mukhopadhyay, M. Finite element free vibration analysis of eccentrically stiffened plates, Comput Struct, 1988, 30, pp 1303–1318.Google Scholar
9. Mallikarjuna, and Kant, T. Free vibration of symmetrically laminated plates using a higher order theory with the finite element method, lnt J Num Meth Eng, 1989,28, pp 1875–1889.Google Scholar
10. Kant, T. and Mallikarjuna, , A higher order theory for free vibration of unsymmetrically laminated composite and sandwich plates — finite element evaluation, Comput Struct, 1989, 32, pp 1125–1132.Google Scholar
11. Kant, T. and Mallikarjuna, Vibration of usymmetrically laminated plates analysed by using a higher order theory with a C° finite element formulation, J Sound Vibr, 1989,134, (1), pp 1–16.Google Scholar
12. Hinton, E., Rock, T. and Zienkiewicz, O.C. A note on mass lumping and related processes in the finite element method, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 1976, 4, pp 245–269.Google Scholar
13. Leech, J.W. Stability of finite difference equations for the transient response of flat plate. AIAA J, 1965, 3, (9), pp 1772–1773.Google Scholar
14. Tsui, T.Y. and Tono, P. Stability of transient solution of moderately thick plate by finite difference method, AIAA J, 1971, 9, pp 2062– 2063.Google Scholar
15. Houlston, R, Slater, J.E., Pego, N. and Desrochers, C.G. On analysis of structural response of ship panels, Comput Struct, 1985, 21, pp 273–289.Google Scholar
16. Jiang, J. and Olson, M.D. Nonlinear dynamic analyis of blast loaded cylindrical shell structures, Comput Struct, 1991, 41, pp 41–52.Google Scholar