Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:53:07.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Torsional Stress Concentration Factors for Grooved Shafts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

K. R. Rushton
K. R. Rushton*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper describes a preliminary investigation of the torsional stress concentration factors for circular shafts containing grooves determined using an analogue computer. The range covered by this analysis is for grooves which increase in depth from a minimum of 0·05 of the diameter of the shaft, with radii which vary from 0·5 to 0·05 of the diameter at the minimum section. Results are presented in the form of a data sheet, and a comparison is made with the approximate expression of Neuber. An investigation is also made of the modifications to the stress concentration factor if the flank is not perpendicular to the centre-line of the shaft.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 673 , January 1967 , pp. 40 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Neuber, H.Theory of Notch Stresses. J. W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1946.Google Scholar
2.Rushton, K. R.Elastic Stress concentrations for the Torsion of Hollow Shouldered Shafts determined by an Electrical Analogue. The Aero Quart, Vol XV, 1964.Google Scholar
3.Inglis, C. E.Stresses in a Plate due to Presence of Cracks and Sharp Corners. Transactions of Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 55, Part 1, p 218, 1913.Google Scholar
4.Cox, H. L. Flow Studies in the Theory of Stress Concentration. ARC, R & M No. 2704, Section II.5, 1953.Google Scholar