Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:48:00.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tailless Aircraft Design Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

G. H. Lee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A few of the outstanding problems connected with the design of tailless aircraft are discussed. The paper does not set out to be in any way a comprehensive dissertation of the whole field of tailless design, as it was considered that it would be more useful to concentrate on some of the recent problems which are exercising the minds of designers at the present moment.

Since the problems discussed are those which are currently causing some degree of speculation, it follows that in the majority of cases only possible means of solution may be suggested and only tentative conclusions drawn.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 51 , Issue 434 , February 1947 , pp. 109 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “Calculations of the induced cambers of four wings,” by Falkner, V. M.. A.R.C. 7667.Google Scholar
“The characteristics of a sheared V-wing,” by Falkner, V. M.. A.R.C. 8255.Google Scholar
“Lifting plane theory of wings with discontinuities of incidence,” by Falkner, V. M.. A.R.C. 8638.Google Scholar
“Comparison of the simple calculated characteristics of four sweptback wings,” by Falkner, V. M.. A.R.C. 7446.Google Scholar
2. “The stalling of swept wings,” by Griffiths, A. A.. A.R.C. 9357.Google Scholar
3. “Trapezfluegel mit Pfeilstellung und Verwindung beim Schieben,” by Hansen, . F.B. 1588.Google Scholar
4. “24 ft. Wind Tunnel tests on the G.A. V-wing tailless glider,” by Kettle, D. J.. Aero 2124.Google Scholar
5. “Dmckverteilungsmessungen an zwei Pfeilfluefeln konstantes Tiefe (ϕ = 30°, 45°) bei unsymmetrischer Anstroemung” by Jacobs, . U.M. 2110.Google Scholar
“Messungen an einem Trapezfoermigen Pfeilfluegel,” by Schwenk, . F.B. 1781.Google Scholar
“Druckverteilungsmessungen an Pfeilfluegeln,” by Luetgebrune, H.. F.B. 1501.Google Scholar
6. “Untersuchungen am Pfeilfluegel mit Landehilfe,“ by Brennecke, . U.M. 3173.Google Scholar
“Auftriebssteigerung beim Pfeilfluegel,” by Schwenk, . F.B. 1876.Google Scholar
7. “Sechskomponentenmessungen an vier Trapezfluegeln mit Pfeilstellung,” by Jacobs, . U.M. 2069.Google Scholar
“Dreikomponentenmessungen an Pfeilfluegeln mit Spreizklappe,” by Hansen, . F.B. 1626. U.M. 2110, see Ref. 5. F.B. 1588, see Ref. 3.Google Scholar
8. “Sechskomponentenmessungen an drei vorwaerts gepfeilten Fluegeln,” by Jacobs, . U.M. 2103.Google Scholar
“Sechskomponentenmessungen an einem 35° rueckgepfeilten Trapezfluegel ohne und mit Spreizklappe,” by Thiel, and Weissinger, . U.M. 1152. F.B. 1588, see Ref. 3.Google Scholar
9. Nachauf- und widerstandsuntersuchungen an Gepfeilten und ungepfeilten Tragfluegeln,” by Luetgebrune, . F.B. 1672.Google Scholar
10. “Untersuchungen zur Auftriebssteigerung an Pfeilfluegeln durch Grenzschichtbeeinflussung,” by Regenscheit, and Schwier, . U.M. 3047.Google Scholar
“Versuche zur Auftriebssteigerung eines Pfeilfluegel durch Ausblasen von Luft,” by Schwier, . U.M. 1114.Google Scholar
11. “Windkanalmessungen an einen 45°—Pfeil— Trapezfluegel mit Nasenklappe,” by Krueger, W.. A.V.A. Göttingen Report No. 44/W/45.Google Scholar
Other Göttingen tests, reference unknown.Google Scholar
12. “Report on investigations by the T.A.A.C. team in Germany, September 1945,” by Wilkinson, K. G.. R.A.E. Tech. Note Aero 1732.Google Scholar
“The Horten tailless aircraft,” R.A.E. Tech. Note Aero 1703.Google Scholar
14. “A new method of two-dimensional aerodynamic design,” by Lighthill, M. J.. A.R.C. 8597.Google Scholar
“A theoretical discussion of wings with leading edge suction,” by Lighthill, M. J.. A.R.C. 8658Google Scholar
15. F.B. 1626, see Ref. 7.Google Scholar
16. “Notes on sweptback wings for high speeds,” by McKinnon Wood, R.. A.R.C. 8806.Google Scholar
17. “3-Komponenten- Windkanalmessungen an gepfeilten Fluegeln und an einen Pfeilfluegel-Gesamtmodell,” by Puffert, . F.B. 1726.Google Scholar
18. “The linear perturbation theory of compressible flow with application to wind-tunnel interference,” by Goldstein, S. and Young, A. D.. A.R.C. 6865.Google Scholar
“The relationship between the compressible flow round a sweptback aerofoil and the incompressible flow round equivalent aerofoils,” by Dickson, R.. Aero 2146.Google Scholar
19. Bericht 127 der Lilienthal—Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
20. “Hochgeschwindigkeitsmessungen an einem Pfeilfluegel,” by Goethert, . F.B. 1813.Google Scholar
22. “A simple approximation method for obtaining the spanwise lift distribution,” by Schrenk, O.. J.R.Ae.S., Vol. XLV. No. 370, Oct. 1941.Google Scholar
23. Analysis of the longitudinal stability of tailless and tailfirst aircraft,” by Neumark, S.. Aero 1859.Google Scholar
24. “Preliminary note on the results of high-speed wind tunnel tests of sweptback wings,” by Bethwaite, C. F., Port, W. and Mallett, G. P.. R.A.E. Tech. Note, Aero 1775.Google Scholar