Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:11:05.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

System integration of high intensity energy subsystems – a thermal management challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

D. M. Pratt
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA
D. Moorhouse
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA

Abstract

Current and future Air Force weapons systems lack the necessary power and cooling capacity to provide full systems level capability as a result of energy and thermal management limitations. Cooling capacity of fuel is already fully utilised leaving little room for additional cooling needs. Additionally, increasing speed, power, and miniaturisation of future systems continue to stress any thermal management capability that we can now deliver. Thus, the focus of this paper is a conceptual assessment of the key energy and thermal management technologies to meet the future energy challenges. It presents an overview of the current state of the art and also possible future research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moorhouse, D.J., A proposed system-level multidisciplinary analysis technique based on exergy methods, AIAA J Aircr, 40, (1), pp 1115.Google Scholar
2. Bejan, A. and Siems, D.L., The need for exergy analysis and thermodynamic optimization in aircraft development, Exergy Int J, 2001, 1, (1), pp 1424.Google Scholar
3. Figliola, R.S., Tipton, R. and Lie, H., Exergy approach to decision based design of integrated aircraft thermal systems, AIAA J Aircr, 2003, 40, (1), pp 4955.Google Scholar
4. Roth, B. and Mavris, D., Generalized model for vehicle thermodynamic loss management, AIAA J Aircr, 2003, 40, (1), pp 5661.Google Scholar
5. Bejan, A., Constructal theory: tree-shaped flows and energy systems for aircraft, AIAA J Aircr, 40, (1), pp 4348 Google Scholar
6. Ashrae, , 1997 ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals, SI Edition, Ch 4, Two Phase Flow, p 41.Google Scholar
7. Hale, D.V., Hoover, M.J. and O’neil, M.J., Phase Change Materials Handbook, September 1971, NASA CR-61363.Google Scholar
8. Zalba, B., Marin, J.M., Cabeza, L.F. and Mehling, H., Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications, Applied Thermal Eng, 2002, 23, pp 251283.Google Scholar
9. Klett, J., Pitch-based carbon foam heat sink with phase change material, 2004, United States Patent # 6,780,505.Google Scholar
10. Hagar, J.W. and Lake, M.L., Novel hybrid composites based on carbon foams, 1992, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 270.Google Scholar
11. Wierschke, K.W., Franke, M.E., Watts, R. and Ponnappan, R., Heat dissipation with pitch based carbon foams and phase changer materials, 2005, 38th AIAA Thermophysics Conference proceedings.Google Scholar
12. Fossett, A.J., Maguire, M.T., Kudirka, A.A., Mills, F.E. and Brown, D.A., Avionics passive cooling with microencapsulated phase change material, J Electronic Packaging, 1998, 120, pp 238242.Google Scholar
16. Colvin, D.P., Mulligan, J.C. and Bryant, Y.G., Enhanced heat transport in environmental systems using microencapsulated phase change materials, 1992, SAE Technical Paper Series, 921224, p 2.Google Scholar
17. Sodano, H.A., Park, G. and Inman, D.J., 2004, Estimation of electric charge output for piezoelectric energy harvesting, Strain, May 2004, 40, (2), pp 4958(10).Google Scholar