Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:11:49.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey of human pilot models for study of Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) in longitudinal aircraft motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

J.H. Bidinotto Open the ORCID record for J.H. Bidinotto [Opens in a new window] ,
H.C. Moura  and
J.P.C.A. Macedo
J.H. Bidinotto*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, São Carlos School of Engineering, Department of Aeronautics Engineering, São Carlos – SP, Brazil
H.C. Moura
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, São Carlos School of Engineering, Department of Aeronautics Engineering, São Carlos – SP, Brazil
J.P.C.A. Macedo
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo, São Carlos School of Engineering, Department of Aeronautics Engineering, São Carlos – SP, Brazil
*
E-mail:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO), although an old issue, still poses a significant threat to aviation safety. The introduction of new systems in modern aircraft modifies the human–machine interaction and makes it necessary for research to revisit the subject from time to time. Given the need of aircraft manufacturers to constantly perform PIO tests, this study analysed the feasibility of using three different computational pilot models (Tustin, Crossover and Precision) to simulate PIO conditions. Three aircraft models with different levels of propensity to PIO (original, low propensity and high propensity) were tested, as well as two pilot gain conditions (normal and high). Data were collected for a purely longitudinal synthetic task through simulations conducted in MATLAB®. PIO conditions were detect using a tuned PIO detection algorithm (ROVER). Data were analysed in terms of both whether the pilot models triggered a PIO condition and for how long the condition was sustained. The results indicated that the three pilot models only provoked PIO conditions when high gain inputs were applied. Additionally, Crossover was the only pilot model to trigger a PIO for the three aircraft models. There were also significant differences between the pilot models in the total PIO time, as the Tustin model typically sustained the oscillatory condition for longer.

Keywords

PIOpilot modelsaircraft longitudinal motionhuman survey
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 126 , Issue 1297 , March 2022 , pp. 533 - 546
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Department of Defense Interface Standard Mil Standard, MIL1797A: Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, Washington D.C., 1995.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Santone, M. and Cao, C. Pilot-induced oscillation suppression by using L1 adaptive control, J Control Sci Eng, May 2012, 2012, (1), pp 1–7.Google Scholar
Ashkenas, I. Pilot-induced oscillations: Their cause and analysis, Tech. Report, DTIC Document, 1964.Google Scholar
Toader, A. and Ursu, I. Pilot modeling based on time-delay synthesis, Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng, March 2013, 228, (5), pp 740–754.10.1177/0954410013478363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tustin, A. The nature of the operators response in manual control, and its implications for controller design, J Inst Electr Eng - Part IIA: Automat Regulat Servo Mech, May 1947, 94, (2), pp 190–206.Google Scholar
McRuer, D.T. and Krendel, E. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior, AGARDograph, January 1974, n.o 188.Google Scholar
Moura, H.C., Bidinotto, J.H. and Belo, E.M. Pilot induced oscillations adaptive suppression in fly-by-wire systems, World Acad Sci Eng Technol, September 2018, 12, (9), pp 870–876.Google Scholar
Moura, H.C. Supressão adaptativa de PIO em sistemas FBW, M.Sc. Dissertation - University of São Paulo (in portuguese), February 2018.Google Scholar
Moura, H.C., Alegre, G.S.P., Bidinotto, J.H. and Belo, E.M. PIO susceptibility in fly-by-wire systems, ICAS Proc 2018, September 2018.Google Scholar
Etkin, B. and Reid, L. Dynamics of Flight – Stability and Control - 3rd ed.,1996, John Willey and Sons.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.G., Arencibia, J. and Munoz, S. Real-time detection of pilot-induced oscillations, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, August 2004, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. Pilot-induced oscillation detection and mitigation, M.Sc. Dissertation - Cranfield University, December 2012.Google Scholar
Mitchell, D.G. and Klyde, D.H. Identifying a PIO – new techniques applied to an old problem, J Guid Control Dyn, January 2008, 31, (1), pp 215–224.Google Scholar