Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:52:37.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steam balloon concept for lifting rockets to launch altitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2019

P. Janhunen*
Affiliation:
Finnish Meteorological Institute Space Research and Observation TechnologiesHelsinkiFinland
P. Toivanen*
Affiliation:
Finnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinkiFinland
K. Ruosteenoja*
Affiliation:
Finnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinkiFinland

Abstract

Launching orbital and suborbital rockets from a high altitude is beneficial because of e.g. nozzle optimisation and reduced drag. Aircraft and gas balloons have been used for the purpose. Here we present a concept where a balloon is filled with pure water vapour on ground so that it rises to the launch altitude. The system resembles a gas balloon because no onboard energy source is carried, and no hard objects fall down. We simulate the ascent behaviour of the balloon. In the baseline simulation, we consider a 10 tonne rocket lifted to an altitude of 18 km.We model the trajectory of the balloon by taking into account steam adiabatic cooling, surface cooling, water condensation and balloon aerodynamic drag. The required steam mass proves to be only 1.4 times the mass of the rocket stage, and the ascent time is around 10 minutes. For small payloads, surface cooling increases the relative amount of steam needed, unless insulation is applied to the balloon skin. The ground-filled steam balloon seems to be an attractive and sustainable method of lifting payloads such as rockets into high altitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sarigul-Klijn, M., Sarigul-Klijn, N., Hudson, G., Mckinney, B., Menzel, L. and Grabow, E. Trade studies for air launching a small launch vehicle from a cargo aircraft, 4rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 10–13 January 2005, Reno, Nevada, US. Paper AIAA–2005–0621, doi:10.2514/6.2005-621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schade, C. and Mosier, M. The Pegasus launch vehicle new capabilities and the future, 15th International Communication Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, California, US, 1994, doi:10.2514/6.1994-1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niederstrasser, C. and Frick, W. Small launch vehicles – a 2015 state of the industry survey, Small Sat Conference 2015, Utah State University, 2015, Paper SSC15–II-7.Google Scholar
Williams, M. Zero2infinity successfully test launches its Bloostar prototype, 2017, https://phys.org/news/2017-03-zero2infinity-successfully-bloostar-prototype.html.Google Scholar
Van Allen, J.A. A 1957 survey of cosmic ray intensity, 0 to 25 km altitude and 86°N to 73°S geomagnetic latitude, J. Geophys. Res., 1994, 99 (A9), pp 1763117636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, P.V. Helium Production Process. In: Timmerhaus, K.D. (ed) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol 1. Springer, 1960, Boston, MA, US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3099-8_31.Google Scholar
Cayley, Sir G. On aerial navigation, Tilloch’s Philosophical Magazine, 1816, 47, pp 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, W.N. A proposal for a steam balloon, Wingfoot Newsletter, 1961, 8, pp 25.Google Scholar
Giraud, A. Aérostats utilisant de la vapeur d’eau comme gaz de sustentation principal, French Patent 2684952, 1993.Google Scholar
Erdmann, H. Füllgas für Luftfahrzeuge, German Patent 214019, 1909.Google Scholar
Papst, H.E.R. Airship, U.S. Patent 3456903, 1969.Google Scholar
Bormann, A., Hermann, J.P. and Skutnik, S. HeiDAS – der Heißdampfaerostat, DGLR-Workshop VI, “Flugsysteme leichter als Luft”, Stuttgart, 910 May, 2003, http://www.heidas.de/docs/HeiDAS_DGLR_LTA_VI_2003.pdf.Google Scholar
Rainwater, E.L. and Smith, M.S. Ultra high altitude balloons for medium-to-large paylaods, Adv. Space Res, 2004, 33 (10), pp 16481652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1976. Calculator: http://www.aerospaceweb.org/design/scripts/atmosphere/.Google Scholar
Hoerner, S.F. Fluid-dynamic drag: practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance, Sighard, F. Hoerner, 1965, Figure 25 in section 6–19.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. Forced convection heat transfer correlations for flow in pipes, past flat plates, single cylinders, single spheres, and for flow in packed beds and tube bundles, AIChE J., 1972, 18 (2), pp 361371.Google Scholar
Gallice, A., Wienhold, F.G., Hoyle, C.R., Immler, F. and Peter, T., Modeling the ascent of sounding balloons: derivation of the vertical air motion, Atmos. Meas. Tech, 2011, 4, pp 22352253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar