Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T04:28:24.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Span-wise wind fluctuations in open terrain as applicable to small flying craft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

M. Thompson ,
S. Watkins ,
C. White  and
J. Holmes
M. Thompson
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
S. Watkins
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
C. White
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
J. Holmes
Affiliation:
JDH Consulting, Mentone, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Micro air vehicles (MAVs) are typically of low mass and moment of inertia and have flight speeds comparable to birds and the larger insects. Such craft traverse the lower levels of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) which is a significantly different environment than that experienced by larger manned aircraft, which spend the majority of their time in relatively clean air and fly at speeds significantly higher than typical wind speeds in the ABL. Here a new series of measurements dedicated to understanding spatial and temporal velocity fields that MAVs experience are presented. Atmospheric wind measurements were taken by sampling four multi-hole dynamic pressure probes spanned perpendicular to the oncoming wind at spans of between 0·014m and up to 0·45m. It was noted that the variation of both longitudinal velocity and flow pitch angle against spacing followed a fractional power law and as such large variations were present even for the smallest inter-probe separations. This effect is thought to explain the increasing piloting difficulties experienced in maintaining good roll control for decreasing scales of craft.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1173 , November 2011 , pp. 693 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. von Kármán, T. and Sears, W. Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion, J Aeronautical Sciences, 1938, 5, (10).Google Scholar
2. Sears, W. Some Aspects of Non-Stationary airfoil Theory and Its practical Application, J Aeronautical Sciences, 1941, 8, (3).Google Scholar
3. Plate, E.J. Aerodynamic characteristics of atmospheric boundary layers, A.C.R. Series 1971: US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
4. McMichael, J.M. and Francis, M.S. Micro Air Vehicles – Toward a New Dimension in Flight. 1997, 28 May 2009; Available from: http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/docs/mav_auvsi.htm.Google Scholar
5. Mueller, T.J. Introduction to the Design of Fixed-Wing Micro Air Vehicles, AIAA Education Series, Schetz, J., 2007: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
6. Galinski, C. Gust resistant fixed wing micro air vehicle, J Aircr, 2006. 43, (5).Google Scholar
7. Watkins, S., Abdulrahim, M., Thompson, M., Segal, R., Shortis, M. and Sheridan, J. Measurements of Gust Sensitivity on MAVs: Part 1. in AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control, 2009. Chicago, Il, USA, AIAA.Google Scholar
8. DARPA-DSO. Defense Sciences Office – Nano Air Vehicle. 2000 25/05/2009; Available from: http://www.darpa.mil/dso/thrusts/materials/multfunmat/nav/index.htm.Google Scholar
9. Watkins, S., Milbank, J., Loxton, B. and Melbourne, W.H. Atmospheric winds and their effects on micro air vehicles, AIAA J, 2006, 44, (11).Google Scholar
10. Etkin, B. Turbulent wind and its effect on flight, J Aircraft, 1981, 18, (5).Google Scholar
11. Davenport, A.G., Grimmond, C.S.B., Oke, T.R. and Wieringa, J. Estimating the roughness of cities and sheltered country. in AMS 12th Conference on Applied Climatology, 2000. Asheville, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
12. Pope, S.B. Turbulent flows, 2001, Cambridge Cambridge Univ Press.Google Scholar
13. Watkins, S., Loxton, B. and Thompson, M. The Flow Fields Around Buildings: A Significant Challenge to MAVs in 13th Australian International Aerospace Congress (AIAC13), 2009. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
14. Watkins, S., Thompson, M., Loxton, B. and Abdulrahim, M. On low altitude flight through the atmospheric boundary layer, Int J Micro Air Vehicles, 2010, 2, (2).Google Scholar
15. Watkins, S., Abdulrahim, M., Thompson, M., Shortis, M., Segal, R. and Sheridan, J. An overview of experiments on the dynamic sensitivity of MAVs to turbulence, Aeronaut J, 2010, 114, (1158).Google Scholar
16. Milbank, J. Turbulent Flow Instrumentation, 2008, 25 November 2009; Available from: http://turbulentflow.com.au/.Google Scholar
17. Watkins, S., Mousley, P. and Hooper, J. Measurement of Fluctuating Flows Using Multi-Hole Probes. in Proceedings of the Ninth International Congresson Sound and Vibration. 2002. Alabama, USA: International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration.Google Scholar
18. Hooper, J.D. and Musgrove, A.R. Reynolds stress, mean velocity, and dynamic static pressure measurement by a four-hole pressure probe, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1997, 15, (4).Google Scholar
19. Chen, J., Haynes, B. and Fletcher, D. Cobra probe measurements of mean velocities, Reynolds stresses and higher-order velocity correlations in pipe flow, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2000, 21, (4).Google Scholar
20. Vino, G., Watkins, S., Mousley, P., Watmuff, J. and Prasad, S. Flow structures in the near-wake of the Ahmed model, J Fluids and Structures, 2005, 20, (5).Google Scholar
21. Kaimal, J.C. and Finnigan, J.J. Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement, 1993, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
22. Houghton, E.L. and Carpenter, P.W. Aerodynamics for engineering students, Butterworth-Heinemann, 5th ed, 2003.Google Scholar
23. Tennekes, H. The Simple Science of Flight: From Insects to Jumbo Jets. 1st english language ed 1996, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
24. Torres, G.E. and Mueller, T.J. Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low reynolds numbers, AIAA J, 2004. 42, (5).Google Scholar
25. Pagliarella, R. On the aerodynamic performance of automotive vehicle platoons featuring pre and post- critical leading forms. School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. PhD (Engineering), 2010, Melbourne, Australia, RMIT University.Google Scholar