Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:12:37.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Objectives and Problems Associated with Model Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

I. A. Simons
I. A. Simons*
Affiliation:
Westland Helicopters Limited
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The need for the testing of aircraft is of course very obvious. New types of aircraft must be flight tested to check the performance predictions, define operational flight envelopes, or set safe-life limits for various components etc. Other flight tests are directed towards the investigation of particular problems, but much of this type of study is best done by model tests; especially when information is required in those areas where theories are known to be poor or even non-existent.

Type
Test Facilities for Helicopters
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 74 , Issue 715 , July 1970 , pp. 539 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rabbott, J. P. Jr. Model vs. Full-Scale Rotor Testing. Proceedings of the 3rd CAL/AVLABS Symposium on Aerodynamics of Rotary Wing and V/STOL Aircraft. Buffalo, 18-20 June 1969.Google Scholar
2. Duncan, W. J., Thom, A. S., Young, A. D. The Mechanics of Fluids. Edward Arnold Ltd, London. 1960.Google Scholar
3. Yaggy, P. F. Future Rotorcraft Research in the USA. Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 73, pp 815–829. September 1969.Google Scholar
4. Long, D. G., Simons, I. A. Some Thoughts on the Use of Pressurised Wind Tunnels and Refrigerant Gases to Achieve Similarity Between Full-Scale and Model Rotors. Westland Helicopters Ltd, Research Memo No 61, March 1970.Google Scholar
5. Crago, W. A. Marine Safety Aspects of Helicopters. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 73, pp 703–712, August 1969.Google Scholar
6. Flewitt, J. R. The Evaluation of a Model Testing Technique for the Evaluation of Helicopter Ditching Characteristics. Saunders-Roe Ltd, Report No T/0/209, April 1959.Google Scholar
7. Cook, C. V. Induced Flow Through a Helicopter Rotor in Forward Flight. Westland Helicopters Ltd, Research Paper No 374, January 1970.Google Scholar
8. Simons, I. A., Pacifico, R. E., Jones, J. P. The Movement, Structure and Breakdown of Trailing Vortices from a Rotor Blade. Proceedings of the CAL/USAAVLABS Symposium on Aerodynamic Problems Associated with VISTOL Aircraft. Buffalo, June 1966.Google Scholar
9. Leverton, J. W., Taylor, F. W. Blade Slap. Symposium on the Noise and Loading Actions on Helicopters, V/STOL Aircraft and Ground Effect Machines, South ampton, September 1965. Also Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol 4, No 3, pp 345–357.Google Scholar
10. Lehman, A. F. Model Studies of Helicopter Rotor Flow Patterns in a Water Tunnel. Paper No. 207 presented at the 24th Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society, May 1968.Google Scholar
11. Cook, C. V. Rotor Performance Prediction in Hover. Westland Helicopters Ltd, Research Paper No 357, November 1968.Google Scholar
12. Jenny, D. S., Olson, J. R., Landgrebe, A. J. A Reassessment of Rotor Hovering Performance Prediction Methods. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol 13, No 2, April 1968.Google Scholar
13. Gessow, A., Myers, G. C. Jr. Aerodynamics of the Helicopter. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
14. Scheiman, J. A Tabulation of Helicopter Rotor-Blade Differential Pressure, Stresses and Motion as Measured in Flight. NASA Report TM X-952, March 1964.Google Scholar
15. Legrand, L. F. Structural Solutions Investigated in Connection with the Vibration Problems in the SA.330. Paper No 224 presented at the 24th Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society, May 1968.Google Scholar
16. Davenport, F. J., Front, J. V. Airfoil Sections for Helicopters—A Reconsideration. Proceedings 22nd Annual National Forum of American Helicopter Society, May 1966.Google Scholar
17. Ham, N. D. Aerodynamic Loading on a Two-Dimensional Airfoil During Dynamic Stall. AIAA Journal, Vol 6, No 10, pp 1927–1934, October 1968.Google Scholar
18. Harris, F. D., Pruyn, R. R. Blade Stall—Half Fact, Half Fiction. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol 13, No 2, April 1968.Google Scholar