Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:24:51.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Current Ideas Regarding The Rotating Distributor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. R. Johnstone*
Affiliation:
Tropical Pesticides Research Unit

Extract

Rotary atomisers, initially of brush and disc design, but subsequently superceded by a rotating cage device , have for some while been used with fixed-wing aircraft for producing relatively finely dispersed homogeneous liquid sprays. Common to all these types is rotation in the vertical plane with axial liquid feed intended to give uniform discharge from the rotor periphery. Atomisation, for a given liquid and a fixed rotor diameter, is a function both of the rotor speed and also of the airspeed of the aircraft. In combination these two factors determine the resultant shear force producing break-up of the discharging liquid filaments. With fixed-wing aircraft, having a minimum forward speed of, say, 60 mph, it is ultimately this velocity which determines a theoretical upper limit to the size of droplet which may be produced, but in practice drop size also varies with throughput, and, in connection with anti-Locust spray work, Sayer has found that the normal droplet spectra may be considerably coarsened by dispensing with the orifice feed restrictors and non-drip valves, thus allowing the rotor feed rate to rise to three to four times the design figure.

Type
Distribution Apparatus
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Britten, F. R. J. Some developments in rotary atomisers. 1st International Agricultural Aviation Conference 1959.Google Scholar
2.Crowther, A. J.The distribution of particles by a spinning disc. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, Vol. 3, pp. 288291, 1958.Google Scholar
3.Courshee, R. J. and Ireson, M. J.A rotating granule distributor. Agricultural Aviation, Vol. 4, pp. 131132, 1962.Google Scholar
4.Dallavalle, J. M.Micromeritics, pp. 24 et seq. Pitman, London, 1948.Google Scholar
5.Hill, R. F. Distribution equipment design notes. 1st International Agricultural Aviation Conference. 1959.Google Scholar
6.Hill, R. F. A rotary granule dispenser. 2nd International Agricultural Aviation Conference. 1962.Google Scholar
7.Hill, R. F. and Johnstone, D. R.Tests with a rotarygranule dispenser on a Dragonfly helicopter. Agricultural Aviation, Vol. 4, pp. 133135, 1962.Google Scholar
8.Sayer, J. Further trials of a Beaver aircraft fitted with two Micronair X 1000 Spray Units. Stencilled, Desert Locust Survey, Nairobi. 1962.Google Scholar
9.Yeo, D.Assessments of rotary atomisers fitted to a Cessnaaircraft. Agricultural Aviation, Vol. 3, pp. 131135, 1961.Google Scholar