Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:12:54.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some aspects of centrifugal fan characteristics in blower windtunnels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. E. Johnson
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering, University of Surrey, UK
P. E. Hancock
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and MaterialsEngineering, University of Surrey, UK

Abstract

Measurements have been made in the exit flows of the fan, diffuser, settling chamber and contraction of a low speed blower windtunnel driven by a centrifugal fan. A velocity deficit and streamwise vortex were observed at the diffuser exit when the fan was operating at less than about 0·9 of maximum efficiency but not when operating above. Unacceptably large unsteadiness (-0·7% rms) occurred at low speeds when the fan speed was increased from rest, but not when the fan speed was decreased from full speed. This unsteadiness was at the rotor frequency, and appears to have been caused by laminar boundary layer separation on one or more adjacent aerofoil blades, coupled with slight asymmetry in the rotor. Unsteadiness at the rotor frequency and of comparable magnitude has also been seen in another, larger fan, but was not eliminated in the same way. Attaining high quality flow is likely to require careful attention to the characteristics of individual fans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Now at BP Research and Engineering, Middlesex, UK.

References

1. Mehta, R.D. The aerodynamic design of blower windtunnels with wide angle diffusers, Prog Aerospace Sei, 1977, 18, pp 59120.Google Scholar
2. Mehta, R.D. and Bradshaw, P. Design rules for small low speed windtunnels, Aeronaut J, November 1979, 83, (827), pp 443449.Google Scholar
3. Hancock, P.E. and Johnson, A.E. Close spacing of settling chamber screens, Aeronaut J, April 1997, 101, (1004), pp 179183.Google Scholar
4. Morel, T. Comprehensive design of axisymmetric windtunnel contractions, Trans, ASMEJFE, June 1975, 97, pp 225233.Google Scholar
5. Wieghardt, K.E.G. On the resistance of screens, Aero Quarterly, 1953, 4, 186.Google Scholar
6. Groth, J. and Johansson, A.V. Turbulence reduction by screens, J of Fluid Mech, 1988, 197, pp 139155.Google Scholar
7. AL-ASMI, K.Vortex Shedding in Oscillatory Flow, PhD Thesis, University of Surrey, 1992.Google Scholar