Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:31:17.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Smart spring’ identification for hovering rotor aeroelastic-stability augmentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Gennaretti ,
L. Poloni  and
F. Nitzsche
M. Gennaretti
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
L. Poloni
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University Roma Tre, Rome, Italy
F. Nitzsche
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work deals with tailoring of adaptive material included at the roots of hingeless helicopter rotor blades to be used in individual blade control (IBC) strategies.

Usually, IBC strategies involving the use of adaptive materials either consider adaptive material embedded in the blade structure for inducing strain deformations, or apply adaptive actuators for controlling segments of the blade (e.g. for moving trailing-edge flaps).

Here, the adaptive material is used to provide augmentation of modal damping in a passive control approach, that can be conveniently tuned so as to make it the most suitable for the actual rotor configuration under examination. The presentation of a procedure for tailoring this ‘smart spring’ is the aim of the paper.

The aeroelastic blade model considered consists of a cantilever slender beam undergoing flap, lead-lag and torsional motion, coupled with a strip theory approach for the prediction of the aerodynamic loads, based on the very low frequency approximation of the pulsating-free-stream Greenberg’s theory.

Starting from this model and applying the Galërkin method, generalised mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the basic blade, as well as the incremental generalised mass, damping and stiffness matrices due to the ‘smart spring’ have been determined, the latter depending on the ‘smart spring’ inertial and elastic characteristics.

It will be shown that the application of an optimal control criterion, followed by a low frequency-approximation observer, yields the identification of the most suitable ‘smart spring’ characteristics for augmentation of rotor blade aeroelastic stability. The validity of this procedure will be demonstrated by numerical results concerning the stability analysis of two hovering blade configurations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1071 , May 2003 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fulton, M.V. and Ormiston, R.A., Hover testing of a small-scale rotor with on-blade elevons, J Amer Heli Soc, 2001, 46, pp 96–106.Google Scholar
2. Wilbur, L.M. et al Vibratory loads reduction testing of the NASA/Army/MIT active twist rotor, J Amer Heli Soc, 2002, 47, pp 123–133.Google Scholar
3. Chopra, I., Status of application of smart structures technology to rotor-craft systems, J Amer Heli Soc, 2000, 45, pp 228–252.Google Scholar
4. Nitzsche, F., Grewal, A. and Zimcik, D., Structural component having means for actively varying its stiffness to control vibrations, 2001, US Patent No 5,973,440, European Union Patent EP-996570-B1.Google Scholar
5. Nitzsche, F., Designing an active impedance control device to actively control helicopter blade vibration, 2001, CEAS/AIAA International Forum Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 3, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
6. Kretz, M., Research in multicyclic and active control of rotary wings, Vertica, 1976, 1, pp 95–105.Google Scholar
7. Nitzsche, F., Zimcik, D.G., Wickramasinghe, V.K. and Young, C., Control laws for an active tunable vibration absorber designed for rotor blade damping augmentation, 2002, 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
8. Solaiman, S., Afagh, F.F. and Nitzsche, F., An investigation of the aero-elastic stability of a helicopter blade with a ‘smart’ spring at the root, 1999, 25th European Rotorcraft Forum, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
9. Hodges, D.H. and Ormiston, R.A., Stability of elastic bending and torsion of uniform cantilever rotor blades in hover with variable structural coupling, 1976, NASA TN D-8192.Google Scholar
10. Greenberg, J.M., Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream, 1947, NACA TN-1326.Google Scholar
11. Hodges, D.H. and Dowell, E.H., Nonlinear equation of motion for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted nonuniform rotor blades, 1974, NASA TN D-7818.Google Scholar
12. Poloni, L., Studio di un Sistema di Smorzatori Passivi per la Stabilizzazione Aeroelastica di Rotori di Elicottero, 2001, Tesi di Laurea, University Roma Tre (in Italian).Google Scholar
13. Friedland, B. Control System Design — An Introduction to State-Space Methods, 1986, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
14. Gennaretti, M., Corbelli, A., Mastroddi, F. and Balis Crema, L., Modal analysis of aeroelastic response of a hovering rotor — the impact of the mode choice, 1999, 25th European Rotorcraft Forum, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
15. Gennaretti, M., Corbelli, A. and Mastroddi, F., A comparison among some aeroelastic models for the stability analysis of a flap-lag-torsion helicopter rotor in hover, 2000, 26th European Rotorcraft Forum, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
16. Sharpe, D.L., An experimental investigation of the flap-lag-torsion aero-elastic stability of a small-scale hingeless helicopter rotor in hover, 1986, NASA TP-2546.Google Scholar