Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:41:21.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Size of Aerofoil Models for Quantitative Hydraulic Analogy Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

R. A. A. Bryant
R. A. A. Bryant*
Affiliation:
The New South Wales University of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent article Lundberg has made reference to use of the “ Hydraulic Analogy ” for quantitative investigation of gas dynamics phenomena. This is quite feasible provided that the basic analogy and its limitations are properly understood. In fact, considerable progress has already been made and it has been proved possible to utilise the analogy for both supersonic and transonic research.

A study of the mathematical analogy indicates that the strongest physical analogy between a two-dimensional (inviscid) gas flow and a three-dimensional (viscous) water flow exists for the transonic case when the water depth is approximately one quarter inch and the model is towed. Only thin profiles with small incidence can be sensibly investigated. Under such conditions the analogous water flow may be considered as a distorted dissimilar model of a corresponding prototype gas flow.

Type
Technical Notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 543 , March 1956 , pp. 208 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lundberg, B. K. O. (1955). Aeronautical Research in Sweden. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society Vol. 59, No. 538, p. 675, October 1955.Google Scholar
2. Harleman, D. R. F. and Ippen, A. T. The Range of Application of the Hydraulic Analogy in Transonic and Supersonic Aerodynamics. Mémoires sur la Méchanique des Fluides, Publications Scientifiques et Techniques du Ministère de l'Air.Google Scholar
3. Bryant, R. A. A. (1955). Application of the Gas Dynamics Analogy. The N.S.W. University of Technology, Progress Report, May 1955 (Unpublished).Google Scholar
4. Bryant, R. A. A. The Hydraulic Analogy as a Distorted Dissimilar Model. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences (In the press).Google Scholar
5. Bömelburg, H. (1954). Die praktische Anwendbarkeit der Wasseranalogie in quantitativer Form auf spezielle Probleme der Gasdynamik. Mitteilungen Max-Planck-Institut für Strömungsforschung, Nr. 10, 1954.Google Scholar
6. Orlin, W. J., Linder, N. J. and Bitterly, J. G. (1947). Application of the Analogy between Water Flow with a Free Surface and Two-Dimensional Compressible Gas Flow N.A.C.A. Report No. 875, 1947.Google Scholar
7. Black, J. and Mediratta, O. P. (1951). Supersonic Flow Investigations with a “ Hydraulic Analogy ” Water Channel. The Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. 2, Part 4, pp. 227–253 February 1951.Google Scholar