Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:15:28.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation Techniques in Aeronautics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. J. Foody
Affiliation:
Short Brothers and Harland Ltd.
R. J. A. Paul
Affiliation:
College of Aeronautics

Extract

The science of aeronautics has developed rapidly in a very short space of time, when one reflects on the remarkable achievements which have been made since the advent of powered flight just over fifty years ago. This rapid advance has made the aircraft designer more keenly aware of any new design techniques which would assist him in his further understanding of the problems involved. In the pioneering days of aircraft development the aerodynamic characteristics were obtained largely at the flight test stage of a design. Through time, however, the designer learned that quite a lot of useful information could be obtained from ground tests in wind tunnels, and he therefore made use of an aerodynamic simulation in its broadest terms, in the form of a wind tunnel model. This was an important advance in design technique in that the concept was established of evaluating performance by means of a “model,” in the initial stages of a project design. A much later generation of aircraft resulted in the need for automatic and power control aids to flight. Further advances have resulted in completely pilotless and automatic flight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Booth, A. D. and Booth, K. H. V. (1953). Automatic Digital Calculators. Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1953.Google Scholar
2.Convention on Digital Computer Techniques. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol. 103, No. 13, April 1956.Google Scholar
3.Diprose, K. V. (1955). Analogue Computing Applied to Aeronautics Problems. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 59, p. 479, July 1955.Google Scholar
4.Paul, R. J. A. and Thomas, E. L. (1957). The Design and Applications of a General Purpose Analogue Computer. Journal British I.R.E., January 1957.Google Scholar
5.Carroll, J. M.Analogue Computers for the Engineer. Electronics, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 122129.Google Scholar
6.Bates, J. A. V. (1947). Some Characteristics of a Human Operator. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol. 94, Part IIA, No. 2, 1947.Google Scholar
7.Ringham, G. B. and Cutler, A. E., (1954). Flight Simulators. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, March 1954.Google Scholar
8.Pinsker, W. J. G. The Flight Simulator in Aircraft Control Research and Design. R.A.E. Tech. Note AERO 2467.Google Scholar
9.Locke, A. S. Principles of Guided Missile Design Guidance. D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
10.Spearman, F. R. J.et al. (1956). “TRIDAC” a large Analogue Computing Machine. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol 103, Part III, p. 375, 1956.Google Scholar
11.Magnee, A. B. (1952). Some Limitations on the Accuracy of Electronic Analyzers. Proceedings I.R.E., Vol. 40, pp. 303308. March 1952.Google Scholar
12.Marsocci, V. A. (1956). An Error Analysis of Electronic Analogue Computers. I.R.E. Transactions on Electronic Computers, Vol. EC-S, pp. 207212, December 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Leger, R. M. and Greenstein, J. L. (1956). Simulate Digitally or by Analogue-Digital Combination. Control Engineering, pp 145152, September 1956.Google Scholar
14.Cooper, G. E. (1957). Understanding and Interpreting Pilot Opinion. Aeronautical Engineering Review, March 1957.Google Scholar