Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:26:39.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safety in Spinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

H. B. Irving  and
A. V. Stephens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to give some account of the work on spinning and the progress which has been made since S. B. Gates and L. W. Bryant presented their paper to the Society, which was published in more comprehensive formi by the Aeronautical Research Committee as R, & M. 1001.

Although it is distinctly possible that the aeroplane of the future will be unspinnable it is a fact that the great majority of present day aeroplanes are capable of taking up the spinning motion either inadvertently or by deliberate intent on the part of the pilot. If it were really true that all those aeroplanes which apparently require to be forced into a spin would J ever inadvertently fall into one, a considerable number could be definitely classed as safe by forbidding spinning on such aircraft.

Type
Proceedings
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 255 , March 1932 , pp. 145 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The spinning of aeroplanes. Gates, and Bryant, . October, 1926. R. and M. 1001.Google Scholar
Further experiments on a model of the “Bantam” aeroplane with special reference to the ”flat” spin. Irving, and Batson, . June, 1927. R. and M. 1107.Google Scholar
The spinning of aeroplanes. Bryant, and Gates, . Roy. Aero. Soc. Journal, July, 1927.Google Scholar
Airplane spinning characteristics. H. A. Sutton. February 15, 1928. Air Corps Information Circular No. 613.Google Scholar
Experiments on a model of a single-seater fighter aeroplane in connection with spinning. Irving, and Batson, . May, 1928. R. and M. 1184.Google Scholar
Pressure distribution over a yawed aerofoil. Williams, . October, 1928. R. and M. 1203.Google Scholar
Rolling and sideslip experiments on a model slotted biplane of R.A.F.31 section. Irving, , Batson, and Maidens, . February, 1929. R. and M. 1240.Google Scholar
Experiments on the spinning of a Bristol Fighter aeroplane. Wright, K. V.. May, 1929. R. and M. 1261.Google Scholar
Spinning experiments on a single-seater fighter. August, 1929. Part I.—Further model experiments. Batson, and Irving, . Part II.—Full scale spinning tests. Gates.Google Scholar
Spinning of a model of the Fairy III.F seaplane. Irving, and Batson, . June, 1930. R. and M. 1356.Google Scholar
Note on recovery from a spin. Bryant, and MissJones, . October, 1930. R. and M.Google Scholar
The determination of the moments of inertia of aeroplanes. Gates, . March, 1931. R. and M. 1415.Google Scholar
Free flight spinning experiments with single-seater aircraft H and Bristol Fighter models. Stephens, . April, 1931. R. and M. 1404.Google Scholar
Measured spins on aeroplane H. Gates, . April, 1931. R. and M. 1403.Google Scholar
The effect of centrifugal force on the controls in a spin. Gates, . May, 1931. R. and M. 1416.Google Scholar
Note on the addition of rolling moments due to roll and sideslip. Irving, . June, 1931. R. and M.Google Scholar
Rolling experiments on a model of the Hawker “Hornbill” wings and body. Irving, and Batson, . July, 1931. R. and M. 1422.Google Scholar
Spinning experiments on, a single-seater fighter model with deepened body. Part I. Model experiments. Irving and Batson. Part II. Full-scale tests. Stephens, A. V.. December, 1931. R. & M. 1421.Google Scholar