Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:24:50.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Runway debris impact threat maps for transport aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

S. N. Nguyen ,
E. S. Greenhalgh ,
J. M. R. Graham ,
A. Francis  and
R. Olsson
S. N. Nguyen*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
E. S. Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
J. M. R. Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
A. Francis
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College, London, UK
R. Olsson
Affiliation:
Swerea SICOMP, Mölndal, Sweden
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Large transport aircraft are particularly susceptible to impact damage from runway debris thrown up by the landing gear. A methodology was developed to predict the trajectories of stones lofted by the nose wheel and subjected to aerodynamic forces due to the wake behind the nose landing gear and beneath the aircraft. In conjunction with finite element modelling of the stone/ground/tyre contact mechanics, an analytical model was used to perform a stochastic prediction of the trajectories of runway stones to generate impact threat maps which showed the relative likelihood of stones impinging upon various areas on the underside of a C-130 Hercules. The impact envelopes for the C-130 extended three to eighteen metres behind the nose wheel and two metres either side of the centre of the aircraft. The impact threat maps were especially sensitive to the values of the coefficients of lift and drag acting on the stone during its flight.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1201 , March 2014 , pp. 229 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nguyen, S.N., Greenhalgh, E.S., Olsson, R., Iannucci, L. and Curtis, P.T. Modeling the lofting of runway debris by aircraft tires, J Aircraft, 2008, 45, (5), pp 1701–1714.Google Scholar
2. Nguyen, S.N., Greenhalgh, E.S., Olsson, R., Iannucci, L. and Curtis, P.T. Improved models for runway debris lofting simulations, Aeronaut J, 2009, 113, (1148), pp 669–681.Google Scholar
3. Nguyen, S.N., Greenhalgh, E.S., Olsson, R., Iannucci, L. and Curtis, P.T. Parametric analysis of runway stone lofting mechanisms, Int J Impact Engineering, 2009, 37, (5), pp 502–514.Google Scholar
4. Nguyen, S.N. Modelling of Runway Stone Lofting Mechanisms, PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
5. Arakawa, K., Mada, T., Komatsu, H., Shimizu, T., Satou, M., Takehara, K. and Etoh, G. Dynamic contact behavior of a golf ball during oblique impact: effect of friction between the ball and target, Experimental Mechanics, 2007, 47, (2), pp 277–282.Google Scholar
6. Quinn, A.D. A full-scale experimental and modelling study of ballast flight under high-speed trains, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part F, J Rail and Rapid Transit, 2010, 224, (2), pp 61–74.Google Scholar
7. MacCarthy, N.H. An Experimental Study of the Aerodynamics of Exposed Wheels, PhD Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
8. Francis, A. Modelling the Aerodynamics of Runway Debris Lofting, Imperial College London, MSc Thesis, Department of Aeronautics, 2011.Google Scholar
9. Dobrzynski, W., Pott-Pollenske, M., Foot, D. and Goodwin, M. Landing Gears Aerodynamic Interaction Noise, European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Jyväskylä, Finland, 24-28 July 2004, pp 1–13.Google Scholar
10. Deaves, D.M. and Harris, R.I. A Mathematical Model of the Structure of Strong Winds, Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, UK, (76), 1978, p 18.Google Scholar
11. Greenhalgh, E.S. Characterisation of the realistic impact threat from runway debris, Aeronaut J, 2001, 105, (1052), pp 557–570.Google Scholar
12. Moriarty, P.J., Holley, W.E. and Butterfield, S. Effect of turbulence variation on extreme loads prediction for wind turbines, J Solar Energy Engineering, 2002, 124, (4), pp 387–395.Google Scholar
13. Cheng, P.W. and Bierbooms, W.A.A.M. Extreme gust loading for wind turbines during operation, J Solar Energy Engineering, 2001, 123, (4), pp 356–363.Google Scholar
14. Zahm, A.F. and Bear, R.M. Ground-plane influence on airplane wings, J Franklin Institute, 1921, 191, (5), pp 687–693.Google Scholar
15. Rozhdestvensky, K.V. Wing-in-ground effect vehicles, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2006, 42, (3), pp 211.Google Scholar
16. Abramowski, T. Numerical investigation of airfoil in ground proximity, J Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2007, 45, (2), pp 425–436.Google Scholar
17. Liang, H. A Subsonic lifting surface theory for wing-in-ground effect, Acta Mechanica, 2011, 219, (3), pp 203–217.Google Scholar
18. Zhang, X., Toet, W. and Zerihan, J. Ground effect aerodynamics of race cars, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 2006, 59, (1), pp 33–49.Google Scholar
19. Thivolle-Cazat, E. and Gilliéron, P. Flow Analysis Around a Rotating Wheel, 13th Int Symp on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 26-29 June 2006.Google Scholar
20. Schlichting, H. and Gersten, K. Boundary-layer Theory, 8th ed, Springer-Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
21. Chakraverty, S., Stiharu, I. and Bhat, R.B. Influence of aerodynamic loads on flight trajectory of spinning spherical projectile, AIAA J, 2001, 39, (1), pp 122–125.Google Scholar
22. Chikaraishi, T., Alaki, Y., Maehara, K., Shimosaka, H. and Fukazawa, F. A New Method on Measurement of Trajectories of a Golf Ball, Science and Golf, edited by Cochran, A.J. 1st ed. E & FN Spon, London, UK, 1990, pp 193–198.Google Scholar
23. Smits, A.J. and Smith, D.R. A New Aerodynamic Model of a Golf Ball in Flight, Science and Golf II, Cochran, A.J. and Farelly, M.R.(Eds), E & FN Spon, London, UK, 1994, pp 341–347.Google Scholar
24. Coles, S. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values, Springer-Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar
25. Olsson, R., Donadon, M.V. and Falzon, B.G. Delamination threshold load for dynamic impact on plates, Int J of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43, (10), pp 3124–3141.Google Scholar
26. Clark, N. Drag coefficient of irregular particles in Newton’s settling regime, Powder Technology, 1989, 59, (1), pp 69–72.Google Scholar
27. Goossens, D. A drag coefficient equation for natural, irregularly shaped particles, Catena, 1987, 14, (1), pp 73–99.Google Scholar
28. Bearman, P.W. and Harvey, J.K. Golf Ball Aerodynamics, Aeronautical Quarterly, 1976, 27, (2), pp 112–122.Google Scholar