No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Research in Human Engineering at the Royal Aircraft Establishment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2016
Extract
I accepted, with some alacrity, your Council's invitation to present this lecture since it reflected a growing awareness of the need to pay particular and urgent attention to the correct use of the human operator in the design of aircraft and their systems. My experience suggests we have paid only lip service to human factor requirements and have relied on the adaptability of aircrews to sort things out once the aircraft enters service. We are also faced with the paradox that, the cleverer we become at inventing black boxes to usurp man, the more important it becomes to define the role, the response, the performance and the limitations of man. Any human factor assumptions we make in the early conceptual stages will critically affect the course of the development. If these assumptions are poorly based we shall finish up with an aircraft of limited effectiveness and the exciting new developments in avionics, now being offered will be substantially wasted.
- Type
- Supplementary Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1974
References
1.
Simpson, R. E. and Bolton, C. B. An anthropometric survey of 200 RAF and RN aircrew and the application of the data to garment size rolls. RAE Technical Report 67125 (1967) HMSO R & M 3612 (1970).Google Scholar
2.
Bolton, C. B., Kenward, M., Simpson, R. E. and Turner, G. M. An anthropometric survey of 20C0 RAF Aircrew 1970/71. RAE Technical Report 73083 (1973) (Also RAF IAM Report 531).Google Scholar
3.
HobbsFit. Lt. P. C, RAF. Fit. Lt. P. C, RAF. An anthropometric survey of 500 RAF aircrew heads, 1972. RAE Technical Report 73137 (1973).Google Scholar
4.
Lovesey, E. J. A method for determining facial contours by shadow projection. RAE Technical Report 66192 (1966).Google Scholar
5.
Cobb, J. A projected grid method for recording the shape of the human face. RAE Technical Report 71184 (1971).Google Scholar
6.
Allen, G. R., Maslen, K. R. and Rowlands, G. F.
Some aspects of the dynam.c behaviour of aircrew breathing equipment. Aerospace Medicine, Vol 36, No 11 (1965).Google Scholar
7.
Maslen, K. R. and Rowlands, G. F. A new method of measuring the impedance of the human respiratory sys tem at moderate frequencies. ARC Current Paper 1031 (1969).Google Scholar
8.
Burton, D. R. The stability of breathing regulators RAE Technical Report 71229 (1971).Google Scholar
10.
Bolton, C. B.
Ventile incompressible cushions. Applied Ergonomics, June 1972, 3.2, pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
11.
Attwood, H. C. On the specification of maximum noise levels in aircraft. RAE Technical Report 72089 (1972).Google Scholar
12.
Gordon, C. G. The prediction and control of cockpit noise. ASCC WP61 Symposium, Canberra, October 1972.Google Scholar
13.
Allen, G. R.
Human reaction to vibration. Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol 14, No 5 (1971).Google Scholar
14. BSI, Guide for the evaluation of human response to whole body vibration. BSI Draft for development (in preparation).Google Scholar
15.
Maslen, K. R. Efficiency under prolonged vibrations and the ISO guide. RAE Technioal Memorandum EP 512 (1972).Google Scholar
16.
Shaw, J. M. Techniques for the evaluation of cockpit layouts and activities. Royal Aeronautical Society Sympo sium on Flight Deck Environment and Pilot Workload, March 1973.Google Scholar
18.
Lovesey, E. J. A film analysis technique for crew activity assessment in helicopters. RAE Technical Memorandum EP 538 (1973).Google Scholar
19.
Hopkinson, J. A. and Shackel, B. Summary report of flight deck activity project. Loughborough University. Luterg 83, November 1972.Google Scholar
21.
Browning, A. C. Human engineering studies of high speed pedestrian conveyors. RAE Technical Report 71104 (1971).Google Scholar