Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:53:02.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary Instability of a Panel of Integral Construction with Unflanged Stiffeners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Syed Yusuff
Syed Yusuff*
Affiliation:
The Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A theory of primary failure of compression panels of integral construction with unflanged stiffeners is presented, involving rotation, or translation, or rotation and translation of the stiffeners with the corresponding distortion of the sheet without deformation of the cross sections in their own planes. The investigation shows that the failure may occur generally either by pure torsion of the stiffener with the associated lateral distortion of the sheet or by pure flexure in accordance with whichever mode yields a smaller stress. The theory is compared with the test results covering a fairly wide range of the dimensions involved. The theory is in complete agreement with the experiments. The accuracy of the result thus obtained indicates that the fillets at the junction of the skin and the stiffener are not important and their effects may safely be disregarded.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 58 , Issue 528 , December 1954 , pp. 808 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kappus, , —. (1938). Twisting Failure of Centrally Loaded Open Section Columns in the Elastic Range. N.A.C.A. T.M. 851, 1938.Google Scholar
2. Levy, Samuel, and Kroll, Wilhelmina D. (1948). Primary Instability Open Section Stringers Attached to Sheet. Journal of the Institute of Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 15, October 1948.Google Scholar
3. Keen, E. D. (1953). Integral Construction. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, April 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Integral Construction. Report of the Discussion on the Paper by Keen, E. D.. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, July 1953.Google Scholar
5. Legg, K. L. C. (1954). Integral Construction—A Survey and Experiment. Journal of the Royal Aeronautica Society, July 1954.Google Scholar
6. The Manufacture and Testing of an Integrally Constructe Spar Box. Report No. P.S.7. January 1954. Short Bros and Harland Ltd., Belfast.Google Scholar
7. The Royal Aeronautical Society draft Data Shee 02.01.28-37. On the Estimation of the Initial Bucklin Stress of Stiffened Panels Under Compression. To be published towards the end of 1954.Google Scholar
8. Yusuff, S. (1954). Primary Instability of Unflange Stiffener-Skin Panel of Integral Construction. B.A.C T.O.R. No. 79, May 1954.Google Scholar
9. Wallis, M. and Holmes, J. A. G. (1954). Integrally Machined Panels : Compression Panels. B.A.C. Report No. 56/3. June 1954.Google Scholar
10. Timoshenko, S. (1936). Theory of Elastic Stability. First Edition. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., 1936.Google Scholar