Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:59:26.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary flight test correlations of the X-HALE aeroelastic experiment

Part of: The RAeS Written Paper Prizes 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J. R. Jones  and
C. E. S. Cesnik
C. E. S. Cesnik*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Michigan, USA
*
[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An experimental, remotely-piloted aircraft has been designed and fabricated at University of Michigan that is aeroelastically representative of very flexible aircraft. Known as X-HALE, this Experimental High-Altitude Long-Endurance aircraft exhibits geometrically nonlinear behaviour and displays specific aeroelastic characteristics designed into the experiment. This paper presents the data from the initial flight tests of the lightly instrumented X-HALE Risk Reduction Vehicle that confirm the expected aeroelastic characteristics. This opens the way for future flight tests with a fully-instrumented platform which will provide data to support validation of coupled, nonlinear aeroelastic/flight dynamic codes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 119 , Issue 1217 , July 2015 , pp. 855 - 870
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

References

1.Zerweckh, S.H., von Flotow, A.H. and Murray, J.E.Flight testing a highly flexible aircraft: Case study on the MIT Light Eagle, J Aircr, 1988, 27, (4), pp 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.van Schoor, M.C. and von Flotow, A.H.Aeroelastic characteristics of a highly flexible aircraft, J Aircr, 1990, 27, (10), pp 901–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Patil, M.J., Hodges, D.H. and Cesnik, C.E.S.Nonlinear aeroelasticity analysis of complete aircraft in subsonic flow, J Aircr, 2000, 37, (5), pp 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Patil, M.J., Hodges, D.H. and Cesnik, C.E.S.Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft, J Aircr, 2001, 38, (1), pp 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Patil, M.J. and Hodges, D.H.Flight dynamics of highly flexible flying wings, J Aircr, 2006, 43, (6), pp 1790–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chang, C.S., Hodges, D.H. and Patil, M.J.Flight dynamics of highly flexible aircraft, J Aircr, 2008, 45, (2), pp 538–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cesnik, C.E.S. and Su, W.Nonlinear aeroelastic modeling and analysis of fully flexible aircraft, 2005, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Austin, TX, pp 1–27.Google Scholar
8.Shearer, C.M. and Cesnik, C.E.S.Nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft, J Aircr, 2007, 44, (5), pp 1528–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cesnik, C.E.S. and Brown, E.L.Active warping control of a joined-wing airplane configuration, 2003, 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA, pp 1–15.Google Scholar
10.Drela, M.Integrated simulation model for preliminary aerodynamic, structural, and control-law design of aircraft, 1999, 40th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, St Louis, MO, USA, pp 1–14.Google Scholar
11.Palacios, R., Murua, J. and Cook, R.Structural and aerodynamic models in nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft, AIAA J, 2010, 48, (11), pp 2648–2659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Noll, T.E., Brown, J.M., Perez-Davis, M.E., Ishmael, S.D., Tiffany, G.C. and Gaier, M.Investigation of the Helios prototype aircraft mishap, Volume I, January 2004, NASA Mishap Report.Google Scholar
13.Tang, D. and Dowell, E.H.Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings, AIAA J, 2001, 39, (8), pp 1439–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Su, W., Zhang, J. and Cesnik, C.E.S.Correlations Between UM/NAST nonlinear aeroelastic simulations and experiments of a slender cantilever wing, 2009, International Forum of Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Seattle, WA, USA, pp 1–16.Google Scholar
15.Sotoudeh, Z., Hodges, D.H. and Chang, C.-S.Validation studies for aeroelastic trim and stability of highly flexible aircraft, J Aircr, 2010, 47, (4), pp 1240–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Cesnik, C.E.S., Senatore, P.J., Su, W., Atkins, E.M. and Shearer, C.M.X-HALE: A very flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for nonlinear aeroelastic tests, AIAA J, 2012, 50, (12), pp 2820–2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Cesnik, C.E.S. and Su, W.Nonlinear aeroelastic simulation of X-HALE: A very flexible UAV, 2011, 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, FL, USA, pp 1–13.Google Scholar