Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:00:48.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partial loss of contact in interference fit pin joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

V. A. Eshwar
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
B. Dattaguru
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
A. K. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Extract

Interference fits are an effective method for improving the fatigue performance of bolted joints. The use of Taperlok bolts in aircraft joints is one such example. One of the most important but difficult problems to analyse in these joints is their behaviour after the onset of separation between pin and plate.

Extensive work has been done in the past for the analysis of interference fit joints prior to separation. A comprehensive survey of this area (up to 1965) was brought out by Venkataraman. He also presented many new analytical solutions by a direct method of continuum analysis for interference joints in finite domains. Analysis of these problems in the pre-separation zone continues to draw attention and recently, John Crews used a complex variable technique to analyse the stresses around a flexible pin in an infinite plate under uniaxial tension.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Venkataraman, N. S. A study into the analysis of inter ference fits and related problems. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 1966.Google Scholar
2. Crews, , John, H. Jr. An elastic analysis of stresses in a uniaxially loaded sheet containing an interference fit bolt. NASA TN D-6955, 1972.Google Scholar
3. Stippes, M., Stippes Wilson, H. B. Jr, and Krull, F. N. A contact stress problem for a smooth disc in an infinite plate. Proc 4th US Natl Congr Appl Mech, p 799, 1962.Google Scholar
4. Noble, B. and Hussain, M. A. Exact solution of certain dual series for indentation and inclusion problems. In J Engng Sci, Vol 7, pp 11491161, 1969.Google Scholar
5. Margetson, I. and Morland, L. W. Separation of smooth circular inclusions from elastic and viscoelastic plates subjected to uniaxial tension. Mech Phys Solids, Vol 18, pp 295309, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Keer, L. M., Dundurs, I. and Kiattikomal, K. Separation of a smooth circular inclusion from a matrix, lnt J Engng Sci, Vol 11, pp 12211233, 1973.Google Scholar
7. Harris, H. G., Ojalvo, I. U. and Hooson, R. E. Stress and deflection analysis of mechanically fastened joints. AFFDL-TR-70-49, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1970.Google Scholar
8. Ghadiali, N. D., Hopper, A. T., Sampath, S. G. and Simonen, F. A. Elastic-plastic analysis of interference fit fasteners. Proc of the Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, 1974: The role of mechanics in design- structural joints, AMMRC MS 74-8, 1974.Google Scholar
9. Eshwar, V. A. Partial contact and friction in pin joints. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 1977.Google Scholar
10. Rao, A. K., Raju, I. S. and Krishna murty, A. V. A powerful hybrid method in finite element analysis, lnt J of Num Meth in Engng, Vol 3, pp 389403, 1971.Google Scholar
11. Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, I. N. Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd, 1970.Google Scholar
12. Rao, A. K., Ramamurthy, T. S., Krishna murty, A. V. and Rao, G. V. Bounds and error control in eigenvalues. Feature Lecture, Proc of Tokyo Seminar on Finite Element Analysis, 1973.Google Scholar