Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:16:15.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Operations and aircraft design towards greener civil aviation using air-to-air refuelling

Part of: Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

R. K. Nangia
R. K. Nangia*
Affiliation:
Bristol, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

As civil aviation expands, environmental aspects and fuel savings are becoming increasingly important. Amongst technologies proposed for more efficient flight, air-to-air refuelling (AAR), ‘hopping’ and flying in close formation (drag reduction), all have significant possibilities. It will be interesting to know also how these technologies may co-exist e.g. AAR and formation flying.

In military use, AAR is virtually indispensable. Its benefits are real and largely proven in hostile and demanding scenarios. We present a case for applying AAR in a civil context to show that substantial reductions in fuel burn for long-range missions are achievable. Overall savings, including the fuel used during the tanker missions, would be of the order of 30-40% fuel and 35-40% financial. These are very significant in terms of the impact on aviation’s contribution to reducing atmospheric pollution.

AAR allows smaller, efficient (greener) aircraft optimised for about 3,000nm range to fulfil long-range route requirements. This implies greater usage of smaller airports, relieving congestion and ATC demands on Hub airports. Problems due to shed vortices and wakes at airports are reduced. Smaller engines will be needed.

Integrated (accepted) AAR could lead to further benefits. Aircraft could take-off ‘light’, with minimum fuel and reserves and a planned AAR a few minutes into the flight. The ‘light’ aircraft would not require over-rating of the engines during take-off and would therefore be less noisy during take-off and climb-out, permitting more acceptable night operations.

The availability of civil AAR will enable opportunities for hitherto borderline technologies to be utilised in future aircraft. Laminar flow will provide fuel savings and increased efficiency in its own right but could be significantly enhanced within a civil AAR environment. Similarly, supersonic transport may become an acceptable economic option.

AAR affords the possibility of a complete widening of the design space and this should appeal to the imagination of current and future designers.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1113 , November 2006 , pp. 705 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Bibliography

1. www.boeing.comGoogle Scholar
2. www.airbus.comGoogle Scholar
3. Green, J.E., Greener by Design – The technology challenge, Aeronaut J, February 2002, 106, (1056); Erratum, February 2005, 109, (1092).Google Scholar
4. Green, J.E., Air Travel – Greener by Design. Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation: opportunities & priorities, Aeronaut J, September 2005, 109, (1099).Google Scholar
5. Nangia, R.K., Efficiency parameters for modern commercial aircraft, Aeronaut J, August 2006, 119, (1110), pp 495–510.Google Scholar
6. Green, J.E., Küchemann’s weight model as applied in the first Greener by Design Technology Sub Group Report: a correction, adaptation and commentary, Aeronaut J, August 2006.Google Scholar
7. Jenkinson, L.R., Simpkin, P. and Rhodes, D., Civil Jet Aircraft Design, Arnold, 1999.Google Scholar
8. Blake, W.B. and Multhopp, D., Design, performance and modelling considerations for close formation flight, AIAA Paper 98-4343, August 1998.Google Scholar
9. Nangia, R.K. and Palmer, M.E., Formation flying of commercial aircraft – Assessment using a new approach – Wing span load & camber control, Accepted Paper for AIAA, 2007-0250.Google Scholar
10. Nangia, R.K. and Palmer, M.E., Formation flying of commercial aircraft – Variations in Relative Size/Spacing – Induced Effects & Control, Proposed Paper for AIAA, 2006–7.Google Scholar
11. www.arnoldpublishers.com/aerodataGoogle Scholar
12. Whitford, R., Fundamentals of airliner design, Air International, July 2003.Google Scholar
13. http:/home.maine.rr.com/villery/operatingcosts.htm Google Scholar
14. Fielding, J.P., Introduction to Aircraft Design, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
15. www.CSA(Canadian Space Agency)Google Scholar

General References

Aerospace Source Book, Aviation Week & Space Technology, McGraw-Hill, Published annually.Google Scholar
Flight International, Reed Business Information, Published Weekly.Google Scholar
Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Forestier, J., Lecomte, P. and Poisson-Quinon, Ph., The SST Programmes in the Sixties (UK/Fr, USA, URSS), Paper I, 1, Proceedings of the European Symposium on Future Supersonic Hypersonic Transportation Systems, ACTES, Strasbourg, France, November 1989.Google Scholar
Hepperle, M. and Heinze, W., Future global range transport aircraft, RTO-AVT-99, Paper 21, April 2002.Google Scholar
Lowrie, B.W., Future supersonic transport propulsion optimisation, Session III, Paper III, 2.1, Proceedings of the European Symposium on Future Supersonic Hypersonic Transportation Systems, ACTES, Strasbourg, France. November 1989.Google Scholar
Thibert, J.J., The aerodynamics of future supersonic transport aircraft:, Research Activities at ONERA, RTO-EN-4, May 1998. World Wide Web (www).Google Scholar