Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:44:51.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ONERA activities on high-lift devices for transport aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. J. Thibert ,
J. Reneaux ,
F. Moens  and
J. Preist
J. J. Thibert
Affiliation:
ONERA, France
J. Reneaux
Affiliation:
ONERA, France
F. Moens
Affiliation:
ONERA, France
J. Preist
Affiliation:
ONERA, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

High-lift systems have to provide adequate low speed performance in terms of takeoff and landing lengths, approach speed, climb rate and community noise. Even if the performance of these systems has been continuously improved during the years, there are still some possibilities for further improvements.

ONERA has been involved for a long time in research on high-lift systems for transport aircraft. This research has provided valuable results in the following areas:

  • ● The knowledge of the dominant flow processes involved for 2D and 3D geometries. In particular the stall mechanism, Reynolds and Mach number effects as well as sweep effects have been studied by performing detailed experiments.

  • ● The development of 2D analysis and design codes which have been extensively calibrated with experimental data and are used with confidence for practical applications.

  • ● The design and testing of various high-lift systems which provide manufacturers with data for their own designs.

The paper summarises these activities and presents some typical results. Future trends for research on high-lift systems at ONERA are also given.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 99 , Issue 989: Special issue on high lift and separation control , November 1995 , pp. 395 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Porcheron, B., Thibert, J.J. Etude détaillée de 1'écoulement autour d'un profil hypersustenté. Comparaisons avec les calculs. Sympo sium AGARD on “Improvemenl of Aerodynamic Performance Through Boundary Layer Control and High-Lift Systems”, Brussels, May 1984.Google Scholar
2. Thibert, J.J. The Garteur High-Lift Research Programme, AGARD Conference Proceedings 515, High-Lift System Aerodynamics, Banff, October 1992.Google Scholar
3. Termes, P. et al. Reynolds and Mach number effects and 2D-3D correlation based on measurements and computed results for the Garteur take-off configuration, CEAS European Forum, Bath, March 1995.Google Scholar
4. Arnal, D., Juillen, J.C. and Casalis, G. Fundamental studies related to laminar-turbulent transition problems on swept wings, 1 st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Hamburg, March 1992.Google Scholar
5. Le Balleur, J.C. and Neron, M. Calcul d'écoulements visqueux décollés sur profils d'ailes par une approche de couplage”, Proceedings AGARD-CP-291, Paper 11, 1981, (ONERA TP 1980-122).Google Scholar
6. Le Balleur, J.C. New possibilities of viscous-inviscid numerical techniques for solving viscous flow equations, with massive separation, Proceedings Fourth Symp, Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows, Selected papers, chap. 4, p. 71-96, Editor Cebeci, T., Springer-Verlag 1990, (ONERA TP 1989-24 Reprint).Google Scholar
7. Le Balleur, J.C. Viscous-inviscid calculation of high-lift separated compressible flows over aerofoils and wings, Proceedings AGARD Symp. on High-Lift System Aerodynamics, Banff, October 1992, AGARD-CP-415.Google Scholar
8. Le Balleur, J.C. Strong matching method for computing transonic viscous flows including wakes and separations. Lifting aerofoils”. La Recherche Aérospatiale,1981-3, pp 21-45, English and French editions, March 1981.Google Scholar
9. Le Balleur, J.C. Viscous-inviscid interaction solvers and computation of highly separated flows. Studies of vortex dominated flows, Chap. 3, p. 159-192. Proc. ICASE symp, NASA Langley Field, USA, (July 9-10, 1985), Hussaini, and Salas, (Eds), Springer-Verlag 1987, (ONERA TP 1986-4).Google Scholar
10. Le Balleur, J.C. and Neron, M. Une méthode d'interaction visqueux non-visqueux pour écoulements incompressibles hypersustentés sur profils multicorps en régime de décollement profond”. AGARD Conference Proceedings 515, High-Lift System Aerodynamics, Banff, October 1992.Google Scholar
11. Reneaux, J. Numerical optimization method for airfoil design, La Recherche Aérospatiale, 1984-5.Google Scholar
12. Reneaux, J. and Thibert, J.J. The use of numerical optimization for airfoil design, A1AA Paper 85-5026, Colorado Springs, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Destarac, D. and Reneaux, J. Numerical optimization applied to transport aircraft aerodynamics, La Recherche Aérospatiale, 1993-2.Google Scholar
14. Thibert, J.J., Reneaux, J. and Schmitt, V. Onera activities on drag reduction. 17th ICAS Congress, Stockholm, September 1990.Google Scholar
15. Reneaux, J. and Blanchard, A. The design and testing of an airfoil with hybrid laminar flow control, 1st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Hamburg, March 1992.Google Scholar
16. Thibert, J.J., Quast, A. and Robert, J.P. The A320 laminar fin programme, 1st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Hamburg, March 1992.Google Scholar
17. Moens, F. and Capbern, P. Design and testing of leading-edge high-lift devices for laminar flow wing applications. CEAS European Forum, Bath, March 1995.Google Scholar