Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:19:20.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On upstream influence in shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. S. Dolling
D. S. Dolling*
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction, upstream influence is defined as the distance from the inviscid shock wave to where the incoming boundary layer is first disturbed. The latter position is generally taken as being where the mean wall pressure first increases above the undisturbed value. Wall pressure fluctuation measurements in two Mach 3, high Reynolds number interactions have shown that unsteadiness of the separation shock wave structure results in the instantaneous upstream influence varying over a range of values. Upstream influence as defined above is actually the maximum of this range and, at this distance upstream of the shock wave, the probability of finding the flow disturbed is correspondingly low. The minimum value of the range is the distance from the inviscid shock wave to where the incoming flow is always disturbed. In all of the cases studied the latter station was found to be just upstream of the separation point.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 87 , Issue 868 , October 1983 , pp. 324 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Settles, G. S. An Experimental Study of Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation at High Reynolds Numbers, PhD Dissertation, Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, September 1975.Google Scholar
2. Dolling, D. S. and Bogdonoff, S. M. Blunt Fin-Induced Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction, AIAA Journal, December 1982, 12, 20, 1674–1680.Google Scholar
3. Dolling, D. S. and Murphy, M. T. Unsteadiness of the Separation Shock Wave Structure in a Supersonic Compression Ramp Flowfield, AIAA Journal, to be published 1983.Google Scholar
4. Dolling, D. S. and Bogdonoff, S. M. An Experimental Investigation of the Unsteady Behavior of Blunt Fin-Induced Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions, AIAA Paper #81-1287, June 1981.Google Scholar
5. Dolling, D. S. and Bogdonoff, S. M. Scaling of Interactions of Cylinders with Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers, AIAA Journal, May 1981, 5, 19,655–657.Google Scholar
6. Raman, K. R. A Study of Surface Pressure Fluctuations in Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers, NASA CR-2386, February 1974.Google Scholar
7. Degrez, G. Exploratory Experimental Investigation of the Unsteady Aspects of Blunt Fin Induced Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions, MSE Thesis, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, June 1981.Google Scholar
8. Kistler, A. L. Fluctuating Wall Pressure Under a Separated Supersonic Flow, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, March 1964, 3,36,543–550.Google Scholar
9. Robertson, J. E. Prediction of In-Flight Fluctuating Pressure Environments Including Protuberance Induced Flow, Wyle Laboratories Research Staff Report WR71-10, March 1971.Google Scholar
10. Coe, C. F., Chyu, W. J. and Dods, J. B. Pressure Fluctuations Underlying Attached and Separated Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers and Shock Waves, AIAA Paper #73-996, Aero-Acoustics Conference, Seattle, Washington, October 1973.Google Scholar
11. Chyu, W. J. and Hanly, R. D. Power and Cross Spectra and Space-Time Correlations of Surface Fluctuating Pressures at Mach Numbers Between 16 and 25, NASA TN-D-5440, September 1969.Google Scholar