Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:06:23.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the prospects for increasing dynamic lift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. G. Mabey
D. G. Mabey*
Affiliation:
Dynamics Laboratory Royal Aircraft Establishment, Bedford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A review is given of some recent research, mainly at low speeds, into the development of dynamic lift. Sudden movement of aerodynamic surfaces can generate dynamic lift due to the transient development of separated flow. These dynamic effects are large and well established for aerofoils. They are considered likely to be small for highly swept wings and negligible for slender wings, but there is little experimental evidence to support this inference. The dynamic lift might be increased if conventional sinusoidal motions can be replaced by appropriate periodic saw-tooth motions.

The control of large-scale flow separations by rapid movements of aerodynamic surfaces requires further investigation to resolve some of the controversial issues raised in the review.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 92 , Issue 913 , March 1988 , pp. 95 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Herbst, W. B. Supermanoeuvrability. workshop on unsteady separated flow. United States Airforce Academy. 1983.Google Scholar
2. Luttges, M. W., Robinson, M. C. and Kennedy, D. A. Control of unsteady separated flow structures on aerofoils. AIAA 85–0531, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Roos, F. W. and Kegelman, J. T. Control of coherent structures in reattaching laminar and turbulent shear layers. AIAA 85–0554. 1985.Google Scholar
4. Sigurdson, L. W. and Roshko, A. Controlled unsteady excitation of a reattaching flow. AIAA 85-0552. 1985.Google Scholar
5. Reisenthel, P. H.. Nagib, H. M. and Koga, D. J. Control of separated flows using forced unsteadiness. AIAA 85–0556. 1985.Google Scholar
6. Nagib, H. M.. Reisenthel, P. H. and Koga, D. J. On the dynamical scaling of forced unsteady separated flows. AIAA 85–0553. 1985.Google Scholar
7. Gad el hak, M. and Ho, C. M. Three-dimensional effects of a pitching lifting surface. AIAA 85–041. 1985.Google Scholar
8. Walker, J. M.. Helin, H. E. and Strickland, J. H. An experimental investigation of an aerofoil undergoing large amplitude pitching motions. AIAA 85–039. 1985.Google Scholar
9. Helin, H. E. and Walker, J. M. Inter-related effects of pitch rate and pivot point on aerofoil dynamic stall. AIAA 85–0130. 1985.Google Scholar
10. Mahey, D. G.. Welsh, B. L. Stott, G. and Cripps, B. E. The dynamic characteristics of rapidly moving spoilers at subsonic and transonic speeds. RAE Technical Report 82109. 1982.Google Scholar
11. Kalligras, C. Unpublished research at Bristol University under MOD research agreement 2034/068.Google Scholar
12. Mabey, D. G. Beyond the buffet boundary. Aeronaut J. 1973, 77, 201–215.Google Scholar
13. Tijdeman, H. Investigations of the transonic flow around oscillating aerofoils. NLR TR 77–090 U.Google Scholar
14. Mabey, D. G.. Welsh, B. L. and Cripps, B. E. Measurements of steady and oscillatory pressures on a low aspect ratio model at subsonic and supersonic speeds. RAE Technical Report 84095. 1984.Google Scholar
15. Carr, L. W., Mccroskey, W. J., Mcalister, K. W., Pucci, S. L. and Lamber, O. An experimental study of dynamic stall on advanced aerofoil sections. NASA TM 84245, 1982.Google Scholar
16. Mcalister, K. W., Carr, L. W. and Mccroskey, W. J. Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 0012 aerofoil. NASA TP 1100. 1978.Google Scholar
17. Mabey, D. G. Two-step ramp tests on an RAE 9615 aerofoil. RAE Technical Memorandum to be written.Google Scholar
18. Harper, P. W. and Flanigan, R. E. The effect of rate of change of angle of attack on the maximum lift of a small model. NACA TN 2061. 1950.Google Scholar
19. Ericsson, L. E. and Reding, J. P. Dynamic stall analysis in the light of recent numerical and experimental results. AIAA 75–26, 1975.Google Scholar
20. Fail, R. A. and O'leary, C. O. RAE unpublished tests.Google Scholar
21. Kramer, M.. Zobel, T. and Esche, C. G. Lateral control by-spoiler at the DVL. NASA TM 1307, 1951.Google Scholar
22. Mabey, D. G. Improvements in or relating to aircraft controls. Patent Application 83/14656, 1983.Google Scholar
23. Lang, J. D. and Francis, M. S. Unsteady aerodynamics and dynamic aircraft manoeuvrability. AGARD CP 386. 1985. Paper 29.Google Scholar
24. Laschka, B. Unsteady flows-fundamentals and applications. AGARD CP 386, 1985, Paper 1.Google Scholar
25. Lambourne, N. C., Bryer, D. W. and Maybrey, J. F. M. The behaviour of the leading edge vortices of a delta wing following a sudden change of incidence. R&M 3645. 1970.Google Scholar
26. Lambourne, N. C., Bryer, D. W. and Maybrey, J. F. M. Pressure measurements on a model delta wing undergoing oscillatory deformation. R&M 3693, 1970.Google Scholar
27. Francis, M. S. and Keese, J. E. Aerofoil dynamic stall performance with large-amplitude motions. AIAA J, 1985, 23, (11), 1653–1659.Google Scholar
28. Gallaway, G. R. and Osborn, R. F. Aerodynamic perspective of supermanoeuvrability. AIAA 85–4068. 1985.Google Scholar
29. Ashley, H. On the feasibility of low-speed aircraft manoeuvres involving extreme angles of attack. J Fluids Struct, 1987. 1. 319–335.Google Scholar
30. Gallaway, G. R. and Hankey, W. L. Free-Falling Autorotating Plate — a coupled fluid and flight mechanics problem. AIAA J Aircr, 22, (11). 983–987.Google Scholar
31. Drescher, H. AVA Monograph (MAP Volkenrode) section G2 Experimental determination of unsteady lift. Reports and Translation No. 1011. 1948.Google Scholar
32. Rayner, U. M. V. A vortex theory of animal flight. J Fluid Mech, 1979. 91, Pt 4. 697–763.Google Scholar
33. Lighthill, M. J. On the Weiss-Fogh mechanism of lift generation. J Fluid Mech, 1973, 60, Pt 1, 1–17.Google Scholar