Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:55:23.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the effects of boundary-layer transition on a cylindrical afterbody at incidence in low-speed flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. I. A. Poll*
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Division, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield Institute of Technology

Extract

The experimentally observed changes in the location of boundary layer separation on the cylindrical afterbody of a tangent-ogive-cylinder, placed at incidence in a uniform flow, are related to the phenomenon of laminar-turbulent transition. Existing knowledge of the transition mechanisms which operate in general, three-dimensional; boundary layers, is described and simple prediction criteria are derived for this configuration. These criteria are compared with the currently available empirical methods for the prediction of critical Reynolds numbers for such flows. It is demonstrated that the methods which have been published to date are incomplete and the accompanying analyses are based upon superficial and erroneous physical arguments. The implications of boundary layer transition on the normal forces generated by a cylindrical afterbody are also discussed. Finally, the possibility of using transition fixing to establish ‘high Reynolds number’ separated flows in ‘low Reynolds number’ wind-tunnel facilities is briefly considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lamont, P. J. Pressures around an inclined ogive-cylinder with laminar, transitional or tubulent separation. AIAA Journal, November 1982,20,11, 14921499.Google Scholar
2. Lamont, P. J. The complex asymmetric flow over a 3-5D ogive nose and cylindrical afterbody at high angles of attack. AIAA Paper No 82-0053, Orlando, Florida, 1982.Google Scholar
3. Hunt, B. L. Asymmetric vortex forces and wakes on slender bodies. AIAA Paper No 82-1336, San Diego, California, 1982.Google Scholar
4. Eiffel, G. Sur la résistance des sphères dans l’air en mouvement. Comptes Rendus, 1912,155,15971599.Google Scholar
5. Rayleigh, . Sur la résistance des sphères dans l’air en mouvement. Comptes Rendus, 1913, 156, 109. See also Scientific Papers,1920,6,136.Google Scholar
6. Prandtl, L. Der Widerstand von Kugeln. Nachrichter der Gesellschaft der Wissenrschaften zu Göttingen, 1914, 177. See also The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, August 1927, 31,720741.Google Scholar
7. Fage, A. The airflow around a circular cylinder in the region where the boundary layer separates from the surface. ARC R&M 179, August 1928. See also Philosophical Magazine, February 1929,7,253273.Google Scholar
8. Reding, J. P. and Ericsson, L. E. Maximum side forces and associated yawing moments on slender bodies. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, November-December 1980, 17, 6, 515521.Google Scholar
9. Poll, D. I. A. Transition in the infinite swept attachment-line boundary layer. The Aeronautical Quarterly, November 1979, XXX, 607628.Google Scholar
10. Poll, D. I. A. Some observations of the transition process on the windward face of along yawed cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, January 1985. 150, 329356.Google Scholar
11. Crabtree, L. F. Effects of leading-edge separation on thin wings in two-dimensional incompressible flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, August 1957,24,8,597604.Google Scholar
12. Tani, I. Low speed flows involving bubble separations. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Pergamon Press, 1964,5, 70103.Google Scholar
13. Horton, H. P. Laminar separation bubbles in two and three dimensional incompressible flow. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Queen Mary College, University of London, 1968. See also ARC CP 1073, 1969.Google Scholar
14. Roberts, W. B. Calculation of laminar separation bubbles and their effect on airfoil performance. AIAA Journal, January 1980, 18 125-31Google Scholar
15. James, W. D., Paris, S. W. and Malcolm, G. N. Study of viscous crossflow effects on circular cylinders at high Reynolds numbers. AIAA Journal, September 1980,18,9,10661072.Google Scholar
16. Kamiya, N., Suzuki, S., Nakamura, M. and Yoshinaga, T. Some practical aspects of the burst of laminar separation bubbles. Paper No 10.2, Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, October 1980.Google Scholar
17. Conway, J. T. An effect of boundary layer transition on axisymmetric bodies at incidence. Master of Science Dissentation, Cranfield Institute of Technology, September 1982.Google Scholar
18. Jones, R. T. Effect of sweepback on boundary layer and separation. NACA Technical Report 884, July 1947.Google Scholar
19. Sears, W. R. The boundary layer of yawed cylinders. Journalof the Aeronautical Sciences, January 1948.15,1,4952.Google Scholar
20. Clark, W. H. Body vortex formation on missiles in incompressible flows. AIAA Paper No. 77-1154, August 1977.Google Scholar
21. Champigny, P. Reynolds number effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of an ogive-cylinder at high angles of attack. AIAA Paper No 84-2176, June 1984.Google Scholar
22. Kuethe, A. M. Some aspects of boundary-layer transition and flow separation on cylinders in yaw. Proceedings of the 1st Mid-Western Conference on Fluid Dynamics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1950.Google Scholar
23. Hall, P., Malik, M. R. and Poll, D. I. A. On the stability of an infinite swept attachment line boundary layer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. October 1984. Series A, 395, 229245.Google Scholar
24. Tinling, B.E. and Allen, C. Q. An investigation of the normal-force and vortex wake characteristics of an ogive-cylinder body at subsonic speeds. NASA TN D-1297,1962.Google Scholar
25. Robinson, M. L. Cross-flow characteristics on a cylindrical body at incidence in subsonic flow. Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics Conference, Adelaide, Australia, December 1977.Google Scholar
26. Beasley, J. A. Calculation of the laminar boundary layer and prediction of transition on a sheared wing. ARC R&M 3787, October 1973.Google Scholar
27. Wazzan, A. R., Gazley, C. and Smith, A. M. O. H - Rx method for predicting transition. AIAA Journal, June 1981, 19, 6, 810812.Google Scholar
28. Hartmann, K. Über den einfluss der Reynoldszahl auf die normalkräfte schlanker flugkörperrünpfe. ZFW, 1978, Band 2, Heft 1,2235.Google Scholar
29. Keener, E. R. Oil flow separation patterns on an ogive forebody. AIAA Journal, April 1983, 21, 4, 550556.Google Scholar
30. Fisher, D. F. and Dougherty, S. N. Flight and wind-tunnel correlation of boundary-layer transition of the AEDC transition cone. AGARD Flight Mechanics Panel Symposium, Cesme, Turkey, October 1982.Google Scholar
31. Hoerner, S. F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Published by the author, 1965.Google Scholar
32. Robinson, M. L. The attachment line boundary layer on a body at incidence in subsonic flow. Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics Conference, Brisbane, Australia, August 1980.Google Scholar
33. Poll, D. I. A. Some effects of boundary layer transition on slender axi-symmetric bodies at incidence in incompressive flow. AGARD CP 336, Fluid Dynamics Symposium on Missile Aero dynamics, Trondheim, Norway, September 1982. (College of Aeronautics Report 8221, September 1982).Google Scholar
34. Reding, J. P. and Ericsson, L. E. Re-examination of the maximum normalised vortex-induced side force. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, September-October 1984. 21, 5, 433440.Google Scholar
35. Robinson, M. L. Boundary layer transition on an axisymmetric body at incidence in subsonic flow. Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Newcastle, Australia, November 1982.Google Scholar