Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:39:06.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On power and actuation requirement in swashplateless primary control of helicopters using trailing-edge flaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

F. Gandhi ,
C. Duling  and
F. Straub
F. Gandhi*
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
C. Duling
Affiliation:
US Army, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, USA
F. Straub
Affiliation:
The Boeing Company, Mesa, Arizona, USA
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines three specific aspects pertaining to the trailing-edge flap (TEF) enabled swashplateless primary control of a helicopter. The study is based on a utility helicopter very similar to the UH-60A Blackhawk helicopter, with rotor torsion frequency reduced to 2·1/rev, and 20% chord TEFs extending from 70-90% span. The questions addressed in the paper are the power penalty due to aerodynamic drag associated with TEF control, the pitch-index required to limit the range of TEF deflections over variations in aircraft gross-weight and airspeed, and the influence of rotor RPM variation on swashplateless primary control. Results indicate that the power penalty associated with TEF enabled primary control at high speeds is in the range of 6-7%, due to increased drag on the advancing side in the region of the TEFs and at the blade tips. At low to moderate speeds the increase in power is 2-4% on average, more dependent on the pitch-index, and due to drag increase over most of the azimuth in the region of the TEFs. A variation in pitch-index from 16° for lower speeds and gross weights, to 20-22° for higher speeds and gross weights, would reduce the steady level flight TEF defection requirements to under ±3°, leaving sufficient control margin. Increase in rotor RPM does not increase directly increase thrust (as with a stiff-torsion rotor) but reduces the rotating torsion frequency, and together with the increased dynamic pressures increases the sensitivity to TEF control. At low to moderate speeds a 9% increase in RPM reduces the maximum TEF deflections required by about 1°, but is accompanied by a large increase in rotor power. Conversely, a 9% RPM reduction decreases rotor power required, but the TEF defections required increase by 1–1·5°.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1203 , May 2014 , pp. 503 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Straub, F. and Charles, B. Preliminary Assessment of Advanced Rotor/Control System Concepts (ARCS), Technical Report 90-D03, USA AVSCOM, 1990.Google Scholar
2. Ormiston, R. Aeroelastic Considerations for Rotorcraft Primary Control with On-Blade Elevons, American Helicopter Society 57th Annual Forum Proceedings, Washington, DC, USA, May 2001.Google Scholar
3. Shen, J. and Chopra, I. A parametric design study for a swashplateless helicopter rotor with trailing-edge flaps, J American Helicopter Society, January 2004, 49, (1), pp 43–53.Google Scholar
4. Shen, J. and Chopra, I. Aeroelastic stability of trailing-edge flap helicopter rotors, J American Helicopter Society, October 2003, 48, (4), pp 236–243.Google Scholar
5. Shen, J. and Chopra, I. Aeroelastic modeling of trailing-edge-flap helicopter rotors including actuator dynamics, J Aircr, November-December 2004, 41, (6), pp 1465–1472.Google Scholar
6. Shen, J. and Chopra, I. Swashplateless helicopter rotor with trailing-edge flaps, J Aircr, March-April 2004, 41, (2), pp 208–214.Google Scholar
7. Shen, J., Yang, M. and Chopra, I. Swashplateless helicopter rotor system with trailing-edge flaps for flight and vibration controls, J Aircr, April-May 2006, 43, (2), pp 346–352.Google Scholar
8. Theodorsen, T. and Garrick, I.E. Nonstationary Flow about a Wing-Aileron-Tab Combination Including Aerodynamic Balance, Technical Report No. 736, NACA, 1942.Google Scholar
9. Falls, J., Datta, A. and Chopra, I. Integrated Trailing-Edge Flaps and Servotabs for Helicopter Primary Control, American Helicopter Society 62nd Annual Forum Proceedings, Phoenix, AZ, USA, May 2006.Google Scholar
10. Falls, J., Datta, A. and Chopra, I. Design and Analysis of Trailling Edge Flaps and Servotabs for Primary Control, American Helicopter Society 63rd Annual Forum Proceedings, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 1-3 May 2007.Google Scholar
11. Falls, J., Datta, A. and Chopra, I. Performance Analysis of Trailing Edge Flaps in Helicopter Primary Control, Proceedings of the AHS Specialist’s Conference on Aeromechanics, San Francisco, CA, USA, January 2008.Google Scholar
12. Koratkar, N.A. and Chopra, I. Analysis and testing of Mach-scaled rotor with trailing-edge flaps, AIAA J, July 2000, 38, (7), pp 1113–1124.Google Scholar
13. Koratkar, N.A. and Chopra, I. Wind tunnel testing of a Mach-scaled rotor model with trailing-edge flaps, Smart Materials and Structures, February 2001, 10, (1), pp 1–14.Google Scholar
14. Gandhi, F. and Sekula, M. Helicopter Horizontal Tail Incidence Control to Reduce Rotor Cyclic Pitch and Blade Flapping, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, June 2004.Google Scholar
15. Bluman, J. and Gandhi, F. Reducing trailing edge flap deflection requirements in primary control with a moveable horizontal tail, J American Helicopter Society, 2011, 56, 032005.Google Scholar
16. Gandhi, F., Yoshizaki, Y. and Sekula, M. Swashplateless Control of a Rotary-Wing UAV using Variable RPM and a Movable CG, Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 62nd Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 9–11 May 2006.Google Scholar
17. Duling, C.T. Further Investigations on Helicopter Primary Control Using Trailing Edge Flaps, Master’s Thesis, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, May 2009.Google Scholar
18. Bae, E.-S. and Gandhi, F. CFD Analysis of High-Lift Devices on the SC-1094R8 Aerofoil, Proc. of the 67th Annual American Helicopter Society (AHS) International Forum and Technology Display, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA, 3-5 May 2011.Google Scholar
19. Straub, F.K. and Merkley, D.J. Design of a Servo-flap Rotor for Reduced Control Loads, Proc. of the 50th Annual AHS International Forum, Washington, DC, USA, May 1994.Google Scholar
20. Steiner, J., Gandhi, F. and Yoshizaki, Y. An Investigation of Variable Rotor RPM on Performance and Trim, Proceedings of the 64th Annual AHS International Forum and Technology Display, Montreal, Canada, 29 April–1 May 2008.Google Scholar