Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:36:49.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On innovation in aerodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. G. Hall
M. G. Hall*
Affiliation:
Hall C.F.D. LimitedFarnham, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A discussion is presented of innovative change in aerodynamics, in which the transformation of practical transonic aerodynamics by computational fluid dynamics is taken as a case study for the lessons to be learnt. The study focuses on the historic breakthroughs of Emmons and Murman and Cole in the calculation of transonic flows, and on the exploitation of these at the Royal Aircraft Establishment to provide industry with a new, and highly successful, tool for practical transonic wing design. It reaffirms the view that a first prerequisite for innovation is the active presence of individuals with clear vision and a spirit of adventure. Further, innovative work will flourish only if the climate is favourable, no matter how exceptional the individuals may be. The discussion concludes with remarks on opportunities for innovation in the treatment of Shockwaves, turbulent shear layers and complex practical configurations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 1000 , December 1996 , pp. 462 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hall, M.G. Computational fluid dynamics — a revolutionary force in aerodynamics, RAE TM Aero 1905, 1981 and AIAA Paper 81-1015, 1981.Google Scholar
2. Emmons, H.W. The numerical solution of compressible fluid flow problems, NACA TN 932, 1944.Google Scholar
3. Emmons, H.W. The flow of a compressible fluid past a symmetrical airfoil in a wind tunnel and in free air, NACA TN 1746, 1948.Google Scholar
4. Oswatitsch, K. Die Geschwindigkeitsverteilung bei lokalen Überschallgebieten an flachen Profilen, Z Angew Math Mech, 1950, 30 pp 17–24.Google Scholar
5. Spreiter, J.R. and Alksne, A.Y. Theoretical Prediction of Pressure Distributions on Non-lifting Airfoils at High Subsonic Speeds, NACA Rep 1217, 1955.Google Scholar
6. Lock, R.C. and Bridgewater, J. Theory of aerodynamic design for swept-winged aircraft at transonic and supersonic speeds, Progress Aeronaut Sci,, 1967, 8, pp 139–228.Google Scholar
7. Magnus, R., Gallaher, W. and Yoshihara, H. Inviscid supercritical airfoil theory, Transonic Aerodynamics, AGARD conference proceed ings No 35, Paper 3, 1968.Google Scholar
8. Sells, C.C.L. Plane subcritical flow past a lifting aerofoil, Proc Roy Soc A, 1968, 308, pp 377–401.Google Scholar
9. Magnus, R. and Yoshihara, H. Inviscid transonic flow over airfoils, AIAA Paper 70-47, 1970.Google Scholar
10. Murman, E.M. and Cole, J.D. Calculation of plane steady transonic flows, AIAAJ, 1971, 9, (l), pp 114–121.Google Scholar
11. Albone, CM., Hall, M.G. and Joyce, G. A small-perturbation method for computing transonic flow about lifting swept wings, RAE TR76089, 1976.Google Scholar
12. Jupp, J.A. Interference aspects of the A310 high speed wing configuration,Subsonic/Transonic Configuration Aerodynamics, AGARD CP285, Paper 11, 1980.Google Scholar
13. Back, R.F. and Wedderspoon, J.R. The A320 wing. Designing for commercial success, Aerospace, January 1986, pp 12–19.Google Scholar
14. Ballhaus, W.F. Computational aerodynamics and design (oral presentation of invited paper), 8th International Conference in Fluid Dynamics, Aachen, 1982.Google Scholar