Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:12:54.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical investigation of symmetry breaking and multi-loop hysteresis phenomena in a symmetric supersonic combustor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

T. Cui*
Affiliation:
Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China
Z. Liu*
Affiliation:
Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, China

Abstract

Numerical investigations are performed to study the features of symmetry breaking phenomena in a symmetric supersonic combustor. By changing the fuel equivalence ratio, the symmetry breaking phenomena are numerically observed. Further, the hysteresis behaviours are observed along with the phenomena of symmetry breaking by increasing and then decreasing the the fuel equivalence ratio. Furthermore, more complex hysteresis phenomenon, i.e., multi-loop hysteresis, is observed numerically. The multi-loop hysteresis consists of both major and minor loops, and is associated with the interaction between multiple flow structures. Due to the fact that different flow structures would result in different flow conditions, the findings regarding the existence of hysteresis behaviours can significantly affect the combustion process and even the performance of the engine. It is hoped that the observation of the (multi-loop) hysteresis phenomenon may bring it to the attention of those investigators whose experiments maybe affected by its occurrence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Carroll, B.A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Multiple Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Ducts, PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, US, May 1988.Google Scholar
2.Carroll, B. and Dutton, J.Characteristics of multiple shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions in rectangular ducts, J Propulsion and Power, 1990, 6, (2), pp 186193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rodriguez, C., White, J. and Riggins, D. Three-dimensional effects in modeling of dual-mode scramjets, AIAA 2000-3704, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mohieldin, T., Olynciw, M. and Tiwari, S.Asymmetric Flow Structures in Dual Mode Scramjet Cmbustors with Signifcant Upstream Interaction, Report hx-835, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, US, 2000.Google Scholar
5.Rodriguez, C. Asymmetry effects in numerical simulation of supersonic flows with upstream separated regions, AIAA 2001-0084, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Levy, Y., Hesselink, L. and Degani, D.Anomalous asymmetries in flows generated by algorithms that fail to conserve symmetry, AIAA J, 1995, 33, (6), pp 9991007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mathieu, G., Olivier, C. and Marc, G.Refectional symmetry breaking of the separated flow over three-dimensional bluff bodies, Physical Review E, 2012, 86, (3).Google Scholar
8.Jucha, J., Xu, H., Pumir, A. and Bodenschatz, E.Time-reversal-symmetry breaking in turbulence, Physical Review Letters, 2014, 113, 054501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Cleavera, D.J., Wang, Z. and Gursula, I.Bifurcating flows of plunging aerofoils at high Strouhal numbers, J Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 708, pp 349376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Frank, K.L., Qin, L. and Chaoqun, L.Microvortex generators in high-speed flow, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2012, 53, pp 3045.Google Scholar
11. Ansys, Inc. Ansys Fluent 12·0 User’S Guide, http://Www.Fuentusers.Com/Fuent/Doc/Ori/V121/Commonfles/Help/En-Us/Fluent/Pdf/Ug/Fug.Pdf, Ansys, Inc., 2009.Google Scholar