Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:00:36.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noise predictions for a supersonic business jet using advanced take-off procedures

Part of: ISABE 2017 Sustainable Aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

J. J. Berton ,
S. M. Jones ,
J. A. Seidel  and
D. L. Huff
J. J. Berton*
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, US
S. M. Jones
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, US
J. A. Seidel
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, US
D. L. Huff
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John H. Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, US
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Supersonic civil aircraft present a unique noise certification challenge. High specific thrust required for supersonic cruise results in high engine exhaust velocity and high levels of jet noise during take-off. Aerodynamics of thin, low-aspect-ratio wings equipped with relatively simple flap systems deepen the challenge. Advanced noise reduction procedures have been proposed for supersonic aircraft. These procedures promise to reduce certification noise levels, but they may require departures from normal reference procedures defined in noise regulations. The subject of this article is a take-off performance and noise assessment of a notional supersonic business jet. Analytical models of an airframe and a supersonic engine derived from a contemporary subsonic turbofan core are developed. These models are used to predict take-off trajectories and certification noise levels. Results indicate advanced take-off procedures are helpful in reducing noise along lateral sidelines.

Keywords

Noiseaircraft performancesupersonic transports
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1250 , April 2018 , pp. 556 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A version of this paper was presented at the ISABE 2017 Conference, 3-8 September 2017, Manchester, UK.

References

REFERENCES

1.Annex 16 to the convention on international civil aviation, Vol. I: Aircraft noise, International Standards, and Recommended Practices-Environmental Protection, 7th ed., July 2014, International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
2.Grantham, , W.D. and Smith, P.M. Development of SCR aircraft take-off and landing procedures for community noise abatement and their impact on flight safety, in Supersonic Cruise Research, NASA CP 2108, 1979, pp 299–333.Google Scholar
3.Boeing Commercial Airplanes, High-speed civil transport study, NASA CR-4233, 1989.Google Scholar
4.Society of Automotive Engineers, Method for predicting lateral attenuation of aircraft noise, Aerospace Information Report 5662, April 2006.Google Scholar
5.Berton, J.J. et al. A comparative propulsion system analysis for the high-speed civil transport, NASA TM 2005-213414, 2005.Google Scholar
6.Morgenstern, J. et al. Advanced concept studies for supersonic commercial transports entering service in the 2018-2020 period phase 2, NASA CR 2015-218719, 2015.Google Scholar
7.Claus, R.W. et al. Numerical propulsion system simulation, Computing Systems in Engineering, 1991, 2, (4), pp 357–364.Google Scholar
8.NPSS, Numerical propulsion system simulation, Software Package, Ver. 1.6.5, NASA, 2008.Google Scholar
9.Kirby, M.R. and Mavris, D.N. The environmental design space, 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 14–19 September, 2008, Anchorage, Alaska, ICAS 2008-4.7.3.Google Scholar
10.Suder, K.L., Prahst, P.S. and Thorpe, S.A. Results of an advanced fan stage operating over a wide range of speed and bypass ratio, part 1: Fan stage design and experimental results, NASA TM-2011-216769, 2011.Google Scholar
11.Welge, H.R. et al. N+2 supersonic concept development and systems integration, NASA CR-2010-216842, 2010.Google Scholar
12.McCullers, L.A. Aircraft configuration optimization including optimized flight profiles, NASA CP-2327, April 1984, pp 396–412.Google Scholar
13.Environmental Technical Manual, Vol. I, procedures for the noise certification of aircraft, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection, 2nd ed., 2015, Document 9501.Google Scholar
14.FAA Docket No. NM26; Special Conditions No. 25-ANM-23, Special Conditions: Airbus Industrie Model A320 Series Airplane, 15 December 1988.Google Scholar
15.FAA Docket No. NM248; Special Conditions No. 25-241-SC, Special Conditions: Embraer Model ERJ-170 Series Airplanes; Electronic Flight Control Systems; Automatic Take-off Thrust Control System, 5 September 2003.Google Scholar
16.Gillian, R.E. Aircraft noise prediction program user's manual, NASA TM-84486, 1983.Google Scholar
17.Zorumski, W.E. Aircraft noise prediction program theoretical manual, Parts 1 and 2, NASA TM-83199, 1982.Google Scholar
18.Stone, J.R., Krejsa, E.A., Clark, B.J. and Berton, J.J. Jet noise modeling for suppressed and unsuppressed aircraft in simulated flight, NASA TM-2009-215524, 2009.Google Scholar
19.Kontos, K.B., Janardan, B. and Gliebe, P.R. Improved NASA-ANOPP noise prediction computer code for advanced subsonic propulsion systems, volume 1: ANOPP evaluation and fan noise model improvement, NASA CR-195480, 1996.Google Scholar
20.Kontos, K.B., Kraft, R.E. and Gliebe, P. R. Improved NASA-ANOPP noise prediction computer code for advanced subsonic propulsion systems, Volume 2: Fan Suppression Model Development, NASA CR-202309, 1996.Google Scholar
21.Emmerling, J.J., Kazin, S.B. and Matta, R.K. Core engine noise control program, Vol. III, Supplement 1-Prediction Methods, FAA RD-74-125, III-I, March 1976.Google Scholar
22.Fink, M.R. Airframe noise prediction method, FAA RD-77-29, March 1977.Google Scholar
23.Dahl, M.D. (Ed), Assessment of NASA's aircraft noise prediction capability, NASA TP-2012-215653, July 2012.Google Scholar
24.Maekawa, Z. Noise reduction by screens, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Vol. 12, 1966, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan, pp 472–479.Google Scholar
25.Society of Automotive Engineers. Standard values of atmospheric absorption as a function of temperature and humidity, Aerospace Recommended Practice 866A, 1975.Google Scholar
26.Chien, C.F. and Soroka, W.W. Sound propagation along an impedance plane, J Sound and Vibration, 1975, 43, (1), pp 9–20.Google Scholar
27.Embleton, T.F.W., Piercy, J.E. and Daigle, G.A. Effective flow resistivity of ground surfaces determined by acoustical measurements, J Acoustical Society of America, 1983, 74, (4), pp 1239–1244.Google Scholar
28.Society of Automotive Engineers, Method for predicting lateral attenuation of airplane noise, Aerospace Information Report 5662, 2006.Google Scholar