Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:29:07.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Phase in Aviation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Robert Cockburn*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough

Abstract

Aviation has become a great international utility, and as the scale of investment has grown innovation is increasingly dominated by economic considerations. The time needed to bring research, development and design to fruition is lengthening and economic and technical trends must be appraised tor many years ahead. Of the various parameters defining aircraft design and performance, speed is the most fundamental. The speeds of both military and civil aircraft have been doubling every decade for over 50 years; but the factors which contributed to this exponential growth have changed and a new basis for prediction must be established.

Above high subsonic speed transport efficiency remains sensibly constant although with pronounced optima around Mach 0.8 and Mach 3. In future, aircraft will tend to fall into distinguishable speed regimes; but application will be determined by their economic productivity rather than by small differences in transport efficiency. Subsonic aircraft will remain the mainstay of civil and military aviation for many years, with supersonic aircraft meeting a growing civil demand on the longer international routes and military requirements tor fighters, bombers and reconnaissance aircraft. In neither field is there any imminent demand for hypersonic aircraft.

But if the quest for higher speed is no longer the dominant incentive in aeronautics, there are new in:tiatives at the low speed end of the flight envelope, and continued improvements are foreseeable in the efficiency of propulsion, structure, and avionics. If these opportunities are seized there is a challenging and rewarding future for European aviation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. de Solla, price. Little Science Big Science. Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
2. Gabrielli, G. and Von kÁrmÁn, theodore. What price soeed? Mechanical Engineering. October 1950 p 775.Google Scholar
3. Gibbs-Smith, C. H. Sir George Cayley. Aeronautics 1796-1855. London 1962.Google Scholar
4. Melvill Jones, B. The streamline aeroplane. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, May 1929.Google Scholar
5. Betz, albert. Sonderaufgaben der aerodynamischen For- schung. Schriften Der Deutschen Akademie der Luftfahrt- forschung. Berlin 1940.Google Scholar
6. Küchemann, D. and Weber, J. An analysis of some per formance aspects of various types of aircraft designed to fly over different ranges at different speeds. Progres in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 9, p 329. Pergamon Press 1967.Google Scholar
7. Maskell, E. C. and Weber, J. On the aerodynamic design of slender wings. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, December 1959, p 709.Google Scholar
8. Küchemann, D. Hypersonic aircraft and their aerodynamic problems. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 6, p 271. Pergamon Press 1965.Google Scholar
9. Masefield, P. G. Some economic factors in civil aviation. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1948, p575.Google Scholar
10. Handley Page, F. Developments in aircraft design by the use of slotted wings. Flight, 22nd December 1921, p 844 and 29th December 1921, p 860.Google Scholar
11. Perry, R. L. Variable-sweep aircraft; a case history of multiple re-innovation. AIAA Paper No. 66-983, 1966.Google Scholar
12. Davidson, I. M. The jet flap. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, January 1956.Google Scholar
13. The Griffith airliner explained. Flight, 25th April 1958, p 576 and 2nd May, 1958, p 595.Google Scholar
14. Taylor, J. Structure weight. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1953, p 646.Google Scholar
15. Waters, M. H. L. and Holford, J. E. Some technical factors influencing the direct operating cost of a medium range civil jet transport. Journal of the Aeronautical Society of India, 1965, Vol 17, No. 1, p 26.Google Scholar
16. Argyris, J. H. Recent Advances in Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 4, Pergamon Press 1964.Google Scholar
17. Turner, M. J. et al. Stiffness and deflexion analysis of complex structures. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 23, September 1956.Google Scholar
18. Denke, P. H. A matrix method of structural analysis. Proceed ings 2nd US National Congress of Applied Mechanics, ASME, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
19. Watt, W., Phillips, L. N. and Johnson, W. High strength high modulus carbon fibres. The Engineer, Vol 221, No. 5757, 27th May 1966, p 815816.Google Scholar
20. Phillips, L. N. Carbon Fibre reinforced Plastics. Transactions of the Plastics Institute. August 1967, p 589.Google Scholar
21. Ewans, J. R. Cost Reduction and Cost Avoidance by Value Engineering. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, February 1967, p. 93.Google Scholar