Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T04:31:23.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new moving-boundary algorithm with application to SRM internal ballistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

S. M. H. Karimian  and
A. Amoli
S. M. H. Karimian
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. Amoli
Affiliation:
Aerospace Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper a new moving-boundary algorithm is presented for the solution of two-dimensional flows on unstructured grids. Application of this algorithm is investigated by simulating the internal ballistics of solid rocket motors (SRM). Solution domain is discretised to a number of triangular elements using control-volume based finite-element (CVFE) method. Euler equations are integrated over the control volumes, and Roe's flux-difference scheme is used to evaluate flux vectors at the control-volume surfaces. To eliminate numerical errors due to grid movement, geometric conservation laws (GCL) are carefully implemented. The present algorithm recognises locations along the moving boundaries where the stretched elements result in a distorted grid. To avoid this, new elements are inserted through a local re-triangulation of elements in these regions. Internal ballistics of three SRMs with cylindrical grains burning from inside, are numerically simulated. Using a heat transfer model, erosive burning is included in calculation of propellant burning rate. The aftend of third SRM is tapered to demonstrate capability of present algorithm in solving problems with moving boundaries approaching each other. Very good agreement is observed between the time variations of head-end chamber pressure, obtained from the present work and the other methods.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1054 , December 2001 , pp. 697 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barth, T.J. A 3-D upwind solver for unstructured meshes, AIAA Paper 91-1548, 1991.Google Scholar
2. Demitzic, I. and Peric, M. Finite volume method for prediction of fluid flow in arbitrarily shaped domains with moving boundaries, Int J for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1990, 10, pp 771–790.Google Scholar
3. Zwart, P.J., Raithby, G.D. and Raw, M.J. An integrated space time finite volume method for moving boundary problems, AIAA Paper 98-0518, 1998.Google Scholar
4. Ilinca, A., Camarero, R., Trapanier, J.Y. and Reggio, M. Error estimator and adaptive moving grids for finite volume schemes, AIAA J, 1995, 33, (11), pp 2059–2065.Google Scholar
5. Hirt, C.W., Amsden, A.A. and Cook, J.L. An arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian computing method for all flow speed, J Comp Physics, 1974, 14, pp 227–253.Google Scholar
6. Guruswamy, G.P. Unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic calculations for wings using Euler equations, AIAA J, 1990, 28, pp 461–469.Google Scholar
7. Tilch, R., Morgan, K. and Weatherill, N.P. Transient problems with moving boundaries using adaptive unstructured meshes, Computational Fluid Dynamics' 94, 1994. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
8. Lohner, R. Adaptive remeshing for transient problems, Comp Method in Applied Mech Eng, 1989, 75, pp 195–214.Google Scholar
9. Beneck, J., Buning, P. and Steger, J.I. A 3-D Chimera grid embedding technique, AIAA Paper 85-1523-cp, 1985.Google Scholar
10. Trepanier, J.Y., Zang, H., Reggio, M. and Paraschivoiu, . Periodic Euler and Navier-Stokes solution about oscillating profiles. CAIS J, 38, 1992, pp 71–75.Google Scholar
11. Goswami, A. and Parpia, I.H. Grid restructuring for moving boundaries, AIAA Paper 91-1589-cp, 1991.Google Scholar
12. Kennon, S.R. and Anderson, D.A. Unstructured grid adaption for non- convex domains. Proceedings of the Conference on Numerical Grid Generation in CFD, Editors Sengupta, et al, Pineridge Press, 1988.Google Scholar
13. Tezduyar, T.E., Behr, M. and Liou, J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. the concept and the preliminary tests, Comp Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1994, pp 339–351.Google Scholar
14. Tezduyar, T.E., Behr, M. and Liou, J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces – the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders, Comp Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1994, pp 353–371.Google Scholar
15. Hansbo, P. The characteristic streamline diffusion method for the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations. Camp Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 99, 1992. pp 171–186.Google Scholar
16. Mirsajedi, S.M. and Karimian, S.M.H. Numerical simulation of solid rocket motor internal ballistics, 1998. Sixth Annual/Third International Mechanical Engineering Conference of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers. 18-20 May 1998, Iran University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
17. Mirsajedi, S.M. and Karimian, S.M.H. Effects of axial acceleration and oscillation on solid rocket motor internal ballistics, 1999. Seventh Annual Mechanical Engineering Conference of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers. 14-16 April 1999, Sistan and Baloochestan University, Zahedan, Iran.Google Scholar
18. Karimian, S.M.H. and Amoli, A. Numerical simulation of SRM internal ballistics with internal and external burnings. 1999. Proceedings of Seventh Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, 30 May- 1 June 1999, Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
19. Greatrix, D.R. and Gottlieb, J.J. Erosive burning model for composite-propellant rocket motors with large length-to-diameter ratios, Canadian Aeronaut and Space J, 1987, 33, (3), pp 133–142.Google Scholar
20. Schneider, G.E. and Raw, M.J. Control-volume finite-element method for heat transfer and fluid flow using co-located variables, I. computational procedure. Numerical Heat Transfer, 1987, 11, (4), pp 363–390.Google Scholar
21. Karimian, S.M.H., Amoli, A. and Mazaheri, K. Control-volume finite-element method for the solution of 2D Euler equations on unstructured moving grids. To appear in Iranian J of Science and Tech, 2002.Google Scholar
22. Roe, P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vector, and difference schemes, J Computational Physics, 1981, 43. pp 357–372.Google Scholar
23. Trepanier, J.Y., Reggio, M., Zhang, H. and Camarero, R. A finite volume method for the Euler equations on arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian grids. Computer Fluids, 1991, 20, (4), pp 399–409.Google Scholar
24. Thomas, P.D. and Lombard, C.K. Geometric conservation laws and its application flow computation on moving grids, AIAA J, 1979. 17, pp 1030.Google Scholar
25. Truilo, J.G. and Trigger, K.R. Numerical solution of the one-dimensional hydrodynamic equations in an arbitrary time-dependent coordinate system, Univ of California, Lawrence Radiation Lab Report UCLR-6522, 1961.Google Scholar
26. Thomas, P.D. and Lombard, C.K. A geometric conservation law – a link between finite-difference and finite-volume methods of flow computation on moving grids, AIAA Paper 78-1208.Google Scholar
27. Zhang, H., Reggio, M., Trepanier, J.Y. and Camarero, R. Discrete form of the GCL for moving meshes and its implementation in CFD schemes. Comp Fluids. 1993, 22, (1), pp 9–23.Google Scholar
28. Amoli, A. Two-Dimensional Simulation of SRM Internal Ballistics on a Moving Grid. 1998, MSc thesis. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
29. Karimian, S.M.H. and Amoli, A. Two-dimensional simulation of SRM internal ballistics on a moving grid. 1999. 35th AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 20-24 June 1999, Los Angeles, California, AIAA Paper 99-2801.Google Scholar
30. Lesani, B. Numerical solution of Euler Equations Around Axisymmetric Bodies Using Adaptive Unstructured Grids. 1997, MSc thesis. Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
31. Muller, J.D., Roe, P.L. and Deconick, H. A frontal approach for internal node generation in Delaunay triangulations, Int J for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 20 March 1992.Google Scholar
32. Culick, F.E.C. Rotational axismmetric mean flow and damping of acoustic wave in a solid propellant rocket, AIAA J, 1966, 4, (8), pp 1962–1964.Google Scholar