Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:42:14.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new approach to the third order calibration of internal strain gauge balances used for aerodynamic load measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. J. Niven  and
S. W. Tait
A. J. Niven
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Limerick, Republic of Ireland
S. W. Tait
Affiliation:
British Aerospace, Military Aircraft and Aerostructures, Warton Aerodrome, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With respect to wind tunnel aerodynamic load measurement, an internal strain gauge balance (often referred to as a sting balance) is essentially a compact load cell designed to fit within a cavity of the aerodynamic body and form a link between the model and a fixed ground point via a sting support system. The structure of an internal strain gauge balance is designed to incorporate a series of planar surfaces such that the deflection of each surface is predominantly induced by a unique aerodynamic load. Strain gauges, mounted on groups of surfaces in a Wheatstone bridge arrangement produce output signals proportional to the applied aerodynamic loads. A strain gauge balance is calibrated by applying known loads, measuring the bridge outputs and then formulating an equation which relates the two variables together. Although calibration techniques are well established, reservations have been recently expressed concerning the ability of the associated calibration equation to satisfactorily model the response of the balance when subjected to a six component aerodynamic loading. This generally accepted calibration equation (referred to here as the traditional equation) results in a quadratic approximation to the behaviour of the output signals with applied loads, whereas a more appropriate variation would be cubic. Other limitations of the traditional calibration equation are that the behaviour of the balance to two simultaneously applied loads is based upon limited combinations of the two applied loads, and that the acquisition of the required loads from the strain gauge signals is frequently based upon an approximate matrix inversion method. The proposed calibration equation, described within this paper, models the behaviour of the sting balance to the third order, takes account of all possible combinations of two simultaneously applied loads, and avoids the use of an approximate matrix inversion when deriving the desired aerodynamic loading from the signal outputs. It is also shown that the proposed method may be used to determine the interaction of all possible combinations of up to three simultaneously applied loads.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 104 , Issue 1041 , November 2000 , pp. 501 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fluid dynamics working group 16, Co-operative programme on dynamic wind tunnel experiments for manoeuvring aircraft, AGARD-AR-305, 1996.Google Scholar
2. Pope, A. and Goin, K. High-speed Wind Tunnel Testing, John Wiley and Sons, 1965.Google Scholar
3. Bray, A., Barbato, G. and Levi, R. Theory and Practice of Force Measurement, Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
4. Dubois, M. Fabrication of high precision strain gauge dynamometers and balances at the ONERA, Modane Centre, ONERA-TP-1196, 1973.Google Scholar
5. Dubois, M. Calibration of six component dynamometric balances, 7th IMEKO TC-3 meeting, 1976.Google Scholar
6. Hansen, M. Evaluation and calibration of wire strain gauge wind tunnel balances under load, AGARD Report 13, 8th meeting of Wind Tunnel and Model Testing Panel, 1956.Google Scholar
7. Ewald, B. Balance accuracy and repeatability as a limiting parameter in aircraft development force measurements in conventional and cryogenic wind tunnels, AGARD-CP-429, 1987.Google Scholar
8. Ewald, B., Hufnagel, K., Polansky, L., Graewe, E. and Badet, L. Development and construction of fully automatic calibration machines for internal balances, International symposium on Strain Gauge Balances, NASA Langley, 1996.Google Scholar
9. Smith, D.L. An efficient algorithm using matrix methods to solve wind tunnel force balance equations, NASA-TN-D-6860, 1972.Google Scholar
10. Galway, R.D. A comparison of methods for calibration and use of multi-component strain gauge wind tunnel balances, National Research Council Canada, Aero Rpt, 1980, LR-600.Google Scholar
11. Lam, S.S.W. A Fortran program for the calculation of the calibration coefficients of a six component strain gauge balance, DSTO Australia, AR-005-598, 1989.Google Scholar
12. Lancaster, P., and Salkauskas, K. Curve and Surface Fitting: an Introduction, Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar
13. The Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Excel.Google Scholar
14. Visual Numerics, Stanford Graphics.Google Scholar
15. Woodford, C. Solving Linear and Non Linear Equations, Ellis Horwood, 1992.Google Scholar
16. Foley, T.A. Interpolation and approximation of 3-D and 4-D scattered data, Compu Math Applic, 1987, 13, (8), pp 711–740.Google Scholar