Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:17:04.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Load alleviation in tilt rotor aircraft through active control; modelling and control concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

B. Manimala ,
G. D. Padfield ,
D. Walker ,
M. Naddei ,
L. Verde ,
U. Ciniglio ,
P. Rollet  and
F. Sandri
B. Manimala
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, UK
G. D. Padfield
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, UK
D. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, UK
M. Naddei
Affiliation:
Flight Systems Department, CIRA, Italy
L. Verde
Affiliation:
Flight Systems Department, CIRA, Italy
U. Ciniglio
Affiliation:
Flight Systems Department, CIRA, Italy
P. Rollet
Affiliation:
Eurocopter, Marignane, France
F. Sandri
Affiliation:
Eurocopter, Marignane, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the first results from research into active control of structural load alleviation (SLA) for tiltrotor aircraft carried out in the European ‘critical technology’ RHILP project. The importance of and the need for SLA in tiltrotors are discussed, drawing on previous US experience reported in the open literature. The paper addresses the modelling aspects in some detail; hence forming the foundation for both the FLIGHTLAB simulated XV-15 and EUROTILT configurations. The primary focus of attention is the suppression of in-plane rotor yoke loads for pitch manoeuvres in airplane mode; without suppression these loads would result in a very high level of fatigue damage. Multi-variable control law design methods are used to develop controller schemes and load suppression of 80-90% is demonstrated using rotor cyclic control, albeit at a 20-30% performance penalty. However, rotor flapping transients tend to increase by the action of the SLA system. A dual-objective control design approach demonstrates the effectiveness of suppressing both loads and flapping simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 108 , Issue 1082 , April 2004 , pp. 169 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rollet, , Rhilp, P. — A major step for European knowledge in tiltrotor aeromechanics and flight dynamics, 2001, Aeronautics Days 2001, Hamburg, Germany, January 28–31, 2001.Google Scholar
2. King, D.W., Dabundo, C. and Kisor, R.L. V-22 load limiting control law development, 1993, 49th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, May 1993.Google Scholar
3. Landis, et al Advanced flight control technology achievements at Boeing Helicopters, 1994, Int J Control, 59.Google Scholar
4. Miller, D.G., Black, T.M. And Joglekar, M. Tiltrotor control law design for rotor loads alleviation using modern control techniques, 1991, American Control Conference, Evaston, IL, USA, June 1991, 3, pp 2488–2495.Google Scholar
5. Miller, D.G. and Ham, N.D. Active control of tiltrotor blade in-plane loads during maneuvers, 1988, 14th European Rotorcraft Forum, Milan, Italy, September 1988.Google Scholar
6. Agnihotri, W., Schuessler, R. and Marr, . V-22 aerodynamic loads analysis and development of loads alleviation flight control system, 1989, 45th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, May 1989.Google Scholar
7. Meyer, M. and Padfield, G.D. First steps in the development of handling qualities criteria for a civil tiltrotor, 2002, 58th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Montreal, June 2002.Google Scholar
8. Desopper, A. et al Study of the low speed characteristics of a tiltrotor, 2002, 28th European Rotorcraft Forum, Bristol, UK, September 2002.Google Scholar
9. Renaud, J., Huber, H. and Venn, G. The Eurofar program; A European overview on advanced VTOL civil transportation system, 1991, 17th European Rotorcraft Forum, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
10. Rollet, P. and Thibaudat, C. Eurofar simulation trials on EPOPEE simulator, 1992, 18th European Rotorcraft Forum, Avignon, France, September 1992.Google Scholar
11. Padfield, G.D. and White, M.D. Flight simulation in academia; HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation, 2001, The Challenge of Realistic Rotorcraft Simulation, RAeS Conference, London, November 2001. Aeronaut J, 107, (1075), September 2003, pp 529–538.Google Scholar
12. Harendra, P.B. et al A mathematical model for real time flight simulation of the Bell Model 301 tiltrotor research aircraft, 1973, Bell Helicopter Company Report No 301-099-001, April 1973.Google Scholar
13. Schillings, J.J., Roberts, B.R., Wood, T.L. and Wernicke, K.G. Maneuver performance comparison between the XV-15 and an advanced tiltrotor design, J American Helicopter Soc, May 1990.Google Scholar
14. Maisel, M. NASA/ARMY Tiltrotor research aircraft familiarization document, 1975, NASA TM X-62, 407, January 1975.Google Scholar
15. Peters, D.A. and He, C.J. Finite state induced flow models Part II, Three-dimensional rotor disc, J Aircr, 32, (2), pp 323–333.Google Scholar
16. Padfield, G.D. Helicopter Flight Dynamics, 1996, Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
17. Goldstein, K. and Dooley, L. V-22 control law development, 1986, 42nd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington DC, USA, June 1986, pp 673–684.Google Scholar
18. Packard, A. and Doyle, J.C. The complex structured singular value, Automatica, 1993, 29, (1), pp 71–109.Google Scholar
19. Zhou, K., Doyle, J.C. and Glover, K. Robust and Optimal Control, 1996, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
20. Pavel, M. and Padfield, G.D. Defining consistent ADS-33 metrics for agility enhancement and structural loads alleviation, 2002, 58th American Helicopter Society Forum, Montreal, June 2002 Google Scholar
21. Stevens, B.L. and Lewis, F.L. Aircraft Control and Simulation, 1992, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
22. Balas, G.J., Doyle, J.C., Glover, K., Packard, A. and Smith, R. µ- Analysis and Synthesis Toolbox, 1998, The Mathworks.Google Scholar
23. Skogestad, S and Postlethwaite, I. Multivariable Feedback Control, 1996, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
24. Gaffey, T.M. BA609 Tiltrotor regulatory requirements, 2000, European Helicopter Association Symposium, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 2000.Google Scholar
25. Nannoni, F., Giancamilli, G. and Cicale, M. Erica: The European advanced tiltrotor, 2001, 27th European Rotorcraft Forum, Moscow, Russia, September 2001.Google Scholar