Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:50:46.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limit-cycle taming by nonlinear control with applications to flutter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

F. Mastroddi  and
L. Morino
F. Mastroddi
Affiliation:
University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
L. Morino
Affiliation:
University of Rome III, Rome, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of limit-cycle taming, which is defined in this paper as the use of nonlinear control laws to ensure that the limit-cycle behaviour of the system beyond the stability boundary is of a benign rather than a destructive nature. Specifically, we consider a one-parameter (denoted by λ) autonomous dynamic system having algebraic nonlinearities. We assume that the system has a stable solution, x = 0, for λ < λ0, and experiences a Hopf bifurcation at λ = λ0. Using a singular perturbation analysis about the stability boundary, it is shown that, using a simple nonlinear control law, limit-cycle taming is always possible in the neighbourhood of a Hopf bifurcation. The control system proposed for limit-cycle taming is fully nonlinear, and therefore does not affect the linear behaviour of the system (in particular its stability characteristics). Hence, limit-cycle taming may be used in conjunction with a standard linear active control (e.g. use of linear active control to increase the stability boundary). Applications of the theory to the problem of flutter are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 999 , November 1996 , pp. 389 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Assistant Professor, Dipartimento Aerospaziale, via Eudossiana 16, 00184 Roma

‡

Professor, Dipartimento di Meccanica e Automatica, via C. Segre 60, 00146 Roma

References

1. Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Field, Springer Verlag, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
2. Morino, L. A Perturbation method for treating nonlinear panel flutter problems, AIM J, 1969, 7, pp 405–411.Google Scholar
3. Smith, L. L. and Morino, L. Stability analysis of nonlinear differential autonomous system with applications to flutter, AIM J, 1976, 14, pp 333–341.Google Scholar
4. Sandri, G. The foundations of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, I, Ann of Physc, October 1963, 24, pp 332–379.Google Scholar
5. Frieman, E.A. J Maths Phys, 1963, 4, pp 410.Google Scholar
6. Nayfeh, J. A. A perturbation method for treating nonlinear oscillation problems, J Maths Phys, 1965, 64, pp 368–374.Google Scholar
7. Nayfeh, A.H. and Mook, D.Y. Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
8. Nayfeh, A.H. and Balachandran, B. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons New York, 1995.Google Scholar
9. Morino, L. Flutter taming - a new tool for aeroelastic designer, AFOSR-83-0163, CCAD-TR-84-01, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, 1984.Google Scholar
10. Abed, E.H. and Fu, J.-H. Local feedback stabilization and bifurcation control. I. Hopf bifurcation, Syst Cntl Lett, 1986, 7, pp 11–17.Google Scholar
11. Abed, E.H. and Fu, J.-H. Local feedback stabilization and bifurcation control. II. Stationary bifurcation, Syst Cntl Lett, 1987, 8, pp 467–473.Google Scholar
12. Mastroddi, F. Aeroservoelasticita: problematiche nonlineari, Tesidi Dottorato di Ricerca, Aerospace Department, Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy, 1994.Google Scholar
13. Friedland, B. Control Systems Design - An Introduction to Space State Methods, Me Graw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986.Google Scholar
14. Cole, J. and Kevorkian, J. Uniformly valid asymptotic approximation for certain nonlinear differential equation, Nonlinear Differential Equation in Nonlinear Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1963, 9, pp 113–120.Google Scholar
15. Morino, M., Mastroddi, F. and Cutroni, M. Lie transformation method for dynamical system having chaotic behaviour, Nonlinear Dyn, June 1995, 7, (4), pp 403–428.Google Scholar
16. Morino, L. and Kuo, C.C. Detailed Extension of Perturbation Method for Panel Flutter, ASRL TR-164-2, Aeroelastic and Structures Research Lab, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachussetts, March 1971.Google Scholar
17. Morino, L., Mastroddi, F., De troia, R. and Pecora, M. On finite-state aerodynamic modeling with applications to aeroservoelasticity, Proceedings of international Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg, Francia, 24-26 May 1993, pp 97–116.Google Scholar
18. Morino, M., Mastroddi, F., De troia, R., Ghiringhelli, G.L. and Mantegazza, P. Matrix fraction approach for finite-state aerodynamic modeling, AIAA J, April 1995, 33, (4) pp 703–711.Google Scholar
19. Morino, L., Mastroddi, F. and De troia, R. Instability taming by nonlinear control with application to flutter, proceedings of the XII conferenza AIDAA, Como, Italy, July 1993, pp 1035–1046.Google Scholar