Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:35:21.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legality of Modern Forms of Aerial Warfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. H. N. Johnson
D. H. N. Johnson*
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Everyone here will realise that I have to treat a vast subject in a short period of time, and those who are already familiar with it will be aware that I shall have to make a number of assertions, each of which really deserves separate treatment in its own right. I shall arrange the lecture as follows. I shall begin by clarifying the basic assumptions on which I intend to proceed. Next, I shall look at the state of the laws of aerial warfare at the end of the Second World War. Finally, I shall make a few observations on the present state of the law. As time is limited I shall devote more attention to the principles according to which, in my view, this subject should be broached than to detailed rules.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 72 , Issue 692 , August 1968 , pp. 685 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brierly, J. L. The Law of Nations. 6th ed. Edited by Sir Humphrey Waldock, , pp 71–77, OUP, 1963.Google Scholar
2. Hall, W. E. International Law. 8th ed. Edited by A. Pearce Higgins, , pp 83, 635, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1924.Google Scholar
3. Schwarzenberger, G. A Manual of International Law. 5th ed. Chapter 7, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1967, and University of Malaya Law Review. 1, p 120, 1959.Google Scholar
4. Tucker, Robert W. The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea. p 364, US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1957.Google Scholar
5. Johnson, D. H. N. Rights in Air Space, especially Chapter IV. Manchester University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
6. McDougal, Myres S. and FelicianoFlorentino, P. Florentino, P. Law and Minimum World Public Order, pp 9–12, Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
7. Tucker, , op. cit., p 262. See also Naulilaa Incident (1928). 2 Reports of international Arbitral Awards, p 1012, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
8. Margolis, E. The Hydrogen Bomb Experiments and International Law, 64 Yale Law Journal, p 629, 1955.Google Scholar
9. McDougal, M. S. and Schlei, N. A. The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security. 64 Yale Law Journal, p 648, 1955.Google Scholar
10. D'Amato, Anthony A. Legal Aspects of the French Nuclear Tests, 61 American Journal of International Law, p 66, 1967.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, D. H. N. Rights in Air Space, p 57, Manchester University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
12. Lecture before the Grotius Society on 11th October 1921. Transactions of the Grotius Society, Vol 7, p 109, 1921.Google Scholar
13. The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War. British Year Book of International Law, 29, pp 360, 365, 369, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1952.Google Scholar
14. Wilhflm, R. J. The Geneva Convention and War from the Air, Revue International de la Croix Rouge, Vol VII, p 55, 1954.Google Scholar
15. Phillips, C. P. Air Warfare and Law, 21 George Washington Law Review, pp 311, 395, 405, 1953.Google Scholar
16. Hearings, , p 275 (Italics added).Google Scholar
17. War Crimes in Vietnam, p 134. BAUR, Russell, Allen and Unwin, London, 1967.Google Scholar
18. Spaight, J. M. Air Power and War Rights, 2nd ed. p 172, Longmans, London, 1933.Google Scholar
19. Secretary of State Dean Rusk's News Conference of 24th March 1965 and Statements by US delegates in the UN General Assembly on 14th November and 5th December 1966.Google Scholar
20. On BC Warfare and the law see O'Brien, W. V. in 51 Georgetown Law Journal, p 1, 1962 and Fuller, J. W. in 10 Orbis, p 247, 1966.Google Scholar
21. Cheney, V. Conn, 111 S.J. 562 (Ch.D.), 1967.Google Scholar