Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:20:25.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Left and right in cockpit evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

L. F. E. Coombs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I will put forward what I hope are reasonable explanations of why some of the more important features of the aircraft cockpit and the way in which an aircraft is controlled have been related to a particular side or direction of turning and circling; including the much debated origin of the left-hand circuit.

The ergonomists and the human factors researchers talk of the man/machine relationship and before getting down to detail cases we need to look closely at the human component of the man/machine interface in aviation. Relevant to the subject are the hand and side preferences of the human component, the pilot.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 78 , Issue 767 , November 1974 , pp. 513 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1974 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, R. The Schneider Trophy Races. Chatto and Windus, 1971.Google Scholar
Beaty, D. The Human Factor in Aircraft Accidents. Seeker and Warburg, 1970.Google Scholar
Belloc, H. The Highway and its Vehicles, Studio Ltd, London, pp 1–5, 1926.Google Scholar
Bird, A. Roads and Vehicles. Longmans, 1969.Google Scholar
Black, S. Man and Motor Cars. Seeker and Warburg, 1966.Google Scholar
Blodget, R. (1972) “… spiralling tendencies …” Flying, p 5 et seq., January, 1972.Google Scholar
Chowdahary-Best, G. Correspondence in Mariners Mirror , Vol 58, p 220, May 1972.Google Scholar
Clark, G. and Piggott, S. Prehistoric Societies. Hutchinson, 1968.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. The Pilot's Place. Flight 25th January 1957.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Communication on laterality in aviation. Flight, p 84, 9th January 1959.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Ergonomic Design Characterises the Flight Deck. Design Engineering, 15th September 1970.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Right and Left-Hand Dominance in Navigation. The Journal of Navigation, Vol. 25, 3, pp 359–369, 1972.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Right-Hand Preference at Sea, Mariners Mirror, Vol 58, p 106, February 1972.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Front Office Evolution, Air International Series February 1972, et seq. Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. Flight Deck Evolution, Interavia, Vol 27, 7, p 774 et seq., 1973.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. F. E. The Influence of Human Laterality on the Design and Operation of Vehicles. Unpublished Thesis Univ. Surrey, 1973.Google Scholar
Controls of Early Aircraft. Flight, 2nd October 1909.Google Scholar
Convention for the Regulation of Aerial Navigation, 1919.Google Scholar
Copeland, J. Roads and their Traffic. David and Charles, 1968.Google Scholar
Cross, C. A. Encyclopedia of Highway Law and Practice. Sweet and May-well, ref Part 3, 3-064, 1965.Google Scholar
Cumming, G. and Corkindale, K. Human Factors in the United Kingdom. Human Factors, Vol 2, 3, p 75, 1969.Google Scholar
Damon, Stoudt and McFarland, . The Human Body in Equipment Design. University Press, Cab, Mass, p 202, 1966.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. C. Display Requirements for Advanced Manned Spacecraft, Spaceflight, pp 95–101, March 1969.Google Scholar
Flack, M. The Human Machine in Relation to Flying. Royal Aeronautical Society Paper, 1920.Google Scholar
Fritsch, V. Left and Right in Science and Life. Barrie and Rockliffe, 1968.Google Scholar
Gibbs-Smith, C. H. The Aeroplane: An Historical Survey, HMSO, 1960.Google Scholar
Gibbs-Smith, C. H. The Invention of the Aeroplane. Faber and Faber, 1966.Google Scholar
Gibbs-Smith, C. H. Aviation. HMSO, 1970.Google Scholar
Harris, S. The First to Fly. Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Haddow, G. W. and Grosz, P. M. The German Giants. Putnam, 1962.Google Scholar
Hegner, H. Fokker—The Man and his Aircraft. Harleyford, p 44, 1961.Google Scholar
Hobbs, L. S. The Wright Brothers Engines and Their Design. Smithsonian Annals of Flight No 5, 1971.Google Scholar
Hough, R. and Rrostick, M. A History of the World's Racing Cars. Allen and Unwin, 1965.Google Scholar
Hough, R. Dreadnought. Allen and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Huddy, X. P. The Law of the Automobile. (6th edition by Curtis, A. F.). Bender and Co, 1922.Google Scholar
Imrie, Alex. Pictorial History of the German Army Air Service. Ian Allan, 1971.Google Scholar
Imrie, Alex Private communication on laterality factors in aviation.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. J. Avro Aircraft since 1908. Putnam, 1965.Google Scholar
Josephy, A. M. (ed.) The Adventure of Man's Flight—American Heritage. American Heritage Pub. Co. Inc, 1972.Google Scholar
Kermode, A. C. Mechanics of Flight. Putnam, p 106, 1944.Google Scholar
Kimura, D. The Asymmetry of the Human Brain, Scientific American, Vol 228, 3, pp 70–78, 1973.Google Scholar
Landstrom, B. Sailing Ships. Allen and Unwin, 1969.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. T.e British Fighter Since 1912. Putnam, 1967.Google Scholar
Laubach, et al. Relationships among Isometric Forces measured in Aircraft Control Locations. Aerospace Medicine, July 1972.Google Scholar
Lear Siegler Inc. Design and Development of a Side Stick Controller. Report No. ADR—751/1, 1971.Google Scholar
Loening, G. C. Monoplanes and Biplanes. Munn and Co. N.Y., 1911.Google Scholar
Longmore, Sir A. From Sea to Sky. Geoffrey Bles, pp 17, 25, 1946.Google Scholar
Macmillan, Norman. Great Aircraft. G. Bell & Sons Ltd, 1960.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. Atlantic Wings. Model Aeronautical Press, pp 17, 24, 1966.Google Scholar
McFarland, M. W. The Paper of Orville and Wilbur Wright. McGraw Hill, 1953.Google Scholar
Melvill-Jones, G. Man-Machine Integration: A long term look. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 72, No 694, pp 831–846, 1968.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. T. Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. McGraw Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
Myers, J. M. When am I committed to collision? Proc. US Naval Inst., Vol 98, 12, 833, pp 41–50, 1972.Google Scholar
Noton, D. and Stark, L. Eye Movements and Visual Perception. Scientific American, June 1971.Google Scholar
Ocker, W. C. Instrument Flying to Combat Fog. Scientific American, pp 430–432, December 1930.Google Scholar
Penrose, H. British Aviation: Great War and Armistice. Putnam, p 209, 1969.Google Scholar
Pudney, J. The Camel Fighter. Hamish Hamilton, 1964.Google Scholar
Rae, J. B. The Road and Car in American Life. MIT, pp 13–14, 1971.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Q. The Amazing Mr Doolittle. Appleton Century Crofts Inc. N.Y., 1953.Google Scholar
Rich, et al. Reaction of Pilots to Warning System for Visual Collision Avoidance. SAE Paper No 730312, 1972.Google Scholar
Robertson, B. Sopwith —The Man and His Aircraft. Harleyford, 1970.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. M. Fighter Aircraft Cockpits. RAF Inst. Av. Md. Report No 222, 1964.Google Scholar
Rowland, K. T. Steam at Sea. David and Charles, p 145, 1970.Google Scholar
Scott-Moncrieff, D. Veteran and Edwardian Motor Cars. Batsford, 1963.Google Scholar
Setright, L. J. K. The Power to Fly. Allen and Unwin, pp 19, 27, 39, 1971.Google Scholar
Singleton, , et al. The Human Operator in Complex Systems. Taylor and Francis, 1967.Google Scholar
Singleton, W. T. Display Design: Principles and Procedures. Ergonomics, Vol 12, 4, pp 529–531, 1969.Google Scholar
Smith, W. M. Visually Guided Behaviour and Behaviourly Guided Vision. Ergonomics, 1970.Google Scholar
Smith, K. W. and Smith, W. M. Perception and Motion. W. B. Saunders, Phil, Pa, 1962.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. A. Test Pilot at War. Ian Allan, 1970.Google Scholar
Turner, P. St. J. The Vickers Vimy. Patrick Stephens, 1969.Google Scholar
Villard, H. S. Contact. Arthur Barker Ltd, pp 37, 50, 1968.Google Scholar
Villard, H. S. The New Wright Control. The Aeronautical Journal of The Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 15, No 57, p 28, 1911.Google Scholar