Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:17:58.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic characteristics of longitudinal double folding wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2021

L. Tiegang ,
C. Guoguang Open the ORCID record for C. Guoguang [Opens in a new window]  and
L. Shuai
L. Tiegang
Affiliation:
North University of ChinaShanxi030051China
C. Guoguang*
Affiliation:
North University of ChinaShanxi030051China
L. Shuai
Affiliation:
North University of ChinaShanxi030051China
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A folding wing is a tactical missile launching device that needs to be miniaturised to facilitate storage, transportation, and launching; save missile and transportation space; and improve the combat capability of weapon systems. This study investigates the aeroelastic characteristics of the secondary longitudinal folding wing during the unfolding process. First, the Lagrange equation is used to establish the structural dynamics model of the folding wing, the kinematics characteristics during the deformation process are analysed, and the unfolding movement of the folding wing is obtained using the dynamic equations in the process. Then, the generalised unsteady aerodynamic force is calculated using the dipole grid method, and the multi-body dynamics equation of the folding wing is obtained. The initial angular velocity required for the deployment of the folding wing is analysed through structural model simulation, and the influence of the initial angular velocity on the opening process is studied. Finally, aeroelastic flutter analysis is performed on the folding wing, and the physical model of the folding wing verified experimentally. Results show that the type of aeroelastic response is sensitive to the initial conditions and the way the folding wing opens.

Keywords

pneumatic elasticLagrange equationmultibody dynamicsgeneralised unsteady aerodynamicsflutter
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1293 , November 2021 , pp. 1977 - 2001
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ting, Y. and Lixin, W. Longitudinal multibody dynamic characteristics of Z-wing morphing aircraft. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut, 2010, pp 679–686.Google Scholar
Wenliu, D. Study on the dynamic model of the unfolding process of rudder wings for guided projectiles. Nanjing Univ. Sci. Technol. 2010.Google Scholar
Zhen Wenqiang, S.Y. and Ji, Y. Dynamic Simulation and Experimental Study of Deployment Process of Missile Folding-wing. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37, pp 1409–1414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.08.010.Google Scholar
Miaomiao, Z. Design and Mechanical Properties Research on the Deployable Mechanism of Folding Wing, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 2011.Google Scholar
Hong, D. Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Study for a folding wing of aircraft missiles, Harbin Engineering University, 2010.Google Scholar
Otsuka, K., Wang, Y. and Makihara, K. Deployable wing model considering structural flexibility and aerodynamic unsteadiness for deployment system design. J. Sound Vib, 2017, 408, pp 105–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwiatkowski, R. Dynamic analysis of double pendulum with variable mass and initial velocities. Procedia Eng, 2016, 136, pp 175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W., Yang, Z., Gu, Y. and Wang, X. The nonlinear aeroelastic characteristics of a folding wing with cubic stiffness. J. Sound Vib, 2017, 400, pp 22–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiti, S., Roy, J., Mallik, A.K. and Bhattacharjee, J.K. Nonlinear dynamics of a rotating double pendulum. Phys. Lett. A, 2016, 380, pp 408–412. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2015.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y. and Hu, H. Prediction of transient responses of a folding wing during the morphing process. Aerosp. Sci. Technol, 2013, 24, pp 89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W., Yang, Z. and Gu, Y. Aeroelastic study for folding wing during the morphing process. J. Sound Vib, 2016, 365, pp 216–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, R.L. and Desmarais, R.N. Interpolation using surface splines. J Aircraft, 1972, (9), pp 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y. and Hu, H. Parameterized aeroelastic modeling and flutter analysis for a folding wing. J. Sound Vib, 2012, 331, pp 308–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.08.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchon, J. Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. Constr. Theory Funct. Several Var, 1977, 571, pp 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xuewen, L., Guifeng, Y. and Qingna, L. (Ed.). Optimization Methods. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Snyder, M.P., Sanders, B., Eastep, F.E. and Frank, G.J. Vibration and flutter characteristics of a folding wing. J Aircr, 2009, pp 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selitrennik, Y.L.E. and Karpel, M. Computational aeroelastic simulation of rapidly morphing air vehicles, 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attar, P.J., Tang, D. and Dowell, E.H. Nonlinear aeroelastic study for folding wing structures, 2010.Google Scholar
Fujita, K. and Nagai, H. Robustness analysis on aerial deployment motion of a Mars airplane using multibody dynamics simulation: effects of wing unfolding torque and timing. Aeronaut, 2017, pp 449–468. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tiegang et al. supplementary material

Tiegang et al. supplementary material

Download Tiegang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 818.8 KB