Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:26:38.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of the certification and operational procedures for turboprop aircraft in icing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. P. Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughborough, UK
P. M. Render
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughborough, UK

Abstract

A study was conducted to identify possible improvements to the current certification and operational procedures for turboprop powered aircraft operating in icing conditions. Information was gathered through a series of interviews with airframe and engine manufacturers and also, operators and aircrews in Europe and Canada. The significant issues raised during the interviews are discussed, and a number of recommendations are made for future research and development activities in die area of aircraft icing. These recommendations identify the need for improved ice protection methods, enhanced thermodynamic models in ice prediction computer codes, and development of an ice prediction probe to warn aircrew that they will soon be entering icing conditions. Recommendations also include improvements to pilot training, and the need to make weather forecasts of icing more accurate and specific.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Amendola, A., Mingione, G., Caihol, D. and Hauf, T. Eurice: A European effort for the improvement of in-flight aircraft icing safety. AIAA Paper 98-0093. 1998.Google Scholar
2. Render, P.M. and Simpson, M.P. Investigation into the effectiveness of certification and operational icing procedures for helicopters. AIAA Paper 98-0075. 1998.Google Scholar
3. Norris, G. Flight International, 20 August 1997.Google Scholar
4. Aircraft Icing HandbookVolumes 1-3. DOT/FAA/CT-88. AD-A238 041.US. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. 1991.Google Scholar
5. Render, P.M., Jenkinson, L.R., Caves, R.E. and Pitfield., D.E. Ice detection for turboprop aircraft. Paper 95007. Civil Aviation Authority. 1995.Google Scholar
6. Render, P.M. and Jenkinson, L.R. Investigation into ice detection parameters for turboprop aircraft, AIAA JAircr, January-February 1996, 33(1), pp 125130.Google Scholar
7. Render, P.M. and Simpson, M.P. WP 3.1.2 Review of Certification Requirements, WP 3.2.2 Review of Operational Requirements and Procedures. TT9706. Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University. 1997.Google Scholar
8.JAR 25 Large Aeroplanes. Joint Airworthiness Authority. 1994.Google Scholar
9.JAR23 Normal,Utility,AerobaticandCommuterCategory Aeroplanes, 1994.Google Scholar
10.AGARD-FDP-VKI Lecture Series. Effect of Icing, Dèicing and Heavy Rain on Aircraft Performance, at VKI, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium. Sponsored by the AGARD Fluid Dynamics Panel, FDP Working Group 20 on Ice Accretion Simulation. 1997.Google Scholar