Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:09:17.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Aerospace on Future Transport Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Keith Legg
Keith Legg*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“We are concerned, not with nature alone, but with the total relation between man and the world around him. Its object is not just man's welfare, but the dignity of man's spirit.”

Lyndon B. Johnson

I am most conscious of the honour of being invited to give the Sixth Handley Page Memorial Lecture, particularly in view of the renown of the previous speakers. Since these lectures are jointly sponsored by the Royal Aeronautical Society and the Cranfield Society, I am especially delighted at being the first ex-student of Cranfield who has been invited to present this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 72 , Issue 693 , September 1968 , pp. 771 - 792
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1968 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lachman, G. V. Sir Frederick Handley Page—The Man and His Work. Second Handley Page Memorial Lecture. JRAeS, July, 1964.Google Scholar
2. Legg, K. L. C. Aeronautical Development in Brazil. Aircraft Engineering, July, August, 1962.Google Scholar
3. Lee, G. H. The Handley Page Jetstream. Aircraft Engineering, September, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Legg, K. L. C. Aerospace in Britain—Has it a Future? Public Lecture, Nottingham University, November, 1967.Google Scholar
5. Legg, K. L. C. Aerospace Technology and Higher Education 2016 AD. RAeS Centenary Symposium—The Sky ward Urge, July, 1966.Google Scholar
6.Lockheed Co. L1011 Free World Airlines Market Potential. Lockheed California Co, Burbank, California,February, 1968.Google Scholar
7. SirCockburn, Robert. A New Phase in Aviation. 56th Wilbur and Orville Wright Memorial Lecture. Aero JRAeS, March, 1968.Google Scholar
8. Legg, K. L. C. The Changing Pattern of Aeronautical Technical Education—The University Situation. Symposium RAeS, December, 1967. (To be published.)Google Scholar
9. Stevens, S. J. The Performance of Annular Diffusers. Proc Instn Mech Engrs 1967/68, Vol 182, Pt 3D.Google Scholar
10. Johns, D. J. Some Panel Aero-Elastic Instabilities. AGARD Report 474, September, 1963.Google Scholar
11. Sharman, P. W. Analysis of plated grillages. Joint British Committee for Stress Analysis Conference proceedings, March, 1968.Google Scholar
12. Blake, L. R. A Public Transport System Using Four- Passenger Self-Routing Cars. Proc I Mech E, 1966/ 67, Vol 181, Part 3G.Google Scholar
13. Young, P. C. The Determination of the Parameters of a Dynamic Process. Radio and Electronic Engineer, Vol 29, No 6, June, 1965.Google Scholar
14. Ellis, J. R. and Perry, M. A. The Selection of Instruments and Recording Apparatus for Vehicle Testing. Proc I Mech E, 1967/68, Vol 182, Pt 3B.Google Scholar
15. Ellis, J. R. and Sharpe, R. S. Measurement of Vehicle Characteristics for Ride and Handling. Proc I MechE 1967/68, Vol 182, Pt 3B.Google Scholar
16. Howe, D. Tilt Wing Executive Aircraft E-67, 1967 Design Project, Cranfield. College of Aeronautics Report DES 700/1, February, 1968.Google Scholar
17.HMSO Public Transport and Traffic. Cmnd 3481, December, 1967.Google Scholar
18.Staff of RAE Aerodynamics Department. Industrial Applications of Fluid Mechanics. RAE Tech Memo, Aero 943, June, 1966.Google Scholar
19. Cheeseman, I. C., Seed, A. R. The application of Circulation Control by Blowing to Helicopter Rotors. JRAeS, July, 1967.Google Scholar
20. Cheeseman, I. C. Circulation Control after the Stopped Rotor Aircraft. Spectrum. Google Scholar
21. Dunham, J. The Hovering Performance of a Circulation- Controlled Lifting Rotor. NGTE Report No R294, November, 1967.Google Scholar
22. Johns, D. J., Scruton, C., Ballantyne, A. M., (Editors). Proceeding of a Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. April, 1968, Loughborough University of Technology.Google Scholar
23. Walshe, D. E. A Resume of the Aerodynamic Investigations for the Forth Road and the Severn Bridges. Proc Inst Civ Eng, Vol 37, pp 87–108, May, 1967.Google Scholar
24. Clements, R. E. The Control of Flow Separation at the Stern of a Ship Model Using Vortex Generators. Trans R Inst Nav Arch, December 3rd, 1964.Google Scholar
25. Lister, R. D. Retention of Directional Control when Braking. Soc Automotive Engnrs, IAEC Detroit, Rep No 963 A, January, 1965.Google Scholar
26. White, R. G. S. A Rating Method for Assessing Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Coefficients. Rep No 1967/9, MIRA (Confidential).Google Scholar
27. Craggs, A. The Low Frequency Response of Car Bodies. Rep No 1965/14, MIRA.Google Scholar
28.British Rail. BR Project for 150 mph Gas Turbine Train. Railway Gazette, April 21st, 1967.Google Scholar
29. Wickens, A. H. The Dynamics of Railway Vehicles on Straight Track. Fundamental Considerations of Lateral Stability I. MechE, June, 1965.Google Scholar
30. Thomson, G. J. The Design and Development of Hovercraft Machinery. Inst of Mar Engnrs, November, 1967.Google Scholar
31. Stanton-Jones, R. Skirt Development. An Engineering and Performance Review. BHC Ltd Pub No SP 1490, Issue 2, August, 1967.Google Scholar
32. Bliss, D. S. Application of Air Cushions to High-Speed Guided Land Transport. Prod 1 MechE, 1966/67 Vol 181, Part 3G.Google Scholar
33. McHenry, R. R., Segal, D. J., De Leys, N. J. Computer Simulation of Single Vehicle Accidents. Cornell Aero Lab Stapp Car Crash Conference, October, 1967.Google Scholar
34. Wilson, W. G. Effects of Configurational Changes on Tandem Propeller Performance. CAL Rep No AG 1634 -V-9 February 1966 (USA).Google Scholar
35. Rice, R. S., Wilson, W. G. A Summary Report on the Tandem Propeller Submarine Programs. CAL Rep No AG 1634-V-4, June 1964 (USA).Google Scholar
36. Hotz, R. Britain's Tragic Failure (Editorial). Av Week and Space Technology, January 22nd, 1968.Google Scholar
37. Legg, K. L. C., Ayers, K. B., Jenkinson, L. R. Future Transportation and Urban Developments. Cent Elect Council and University of Aston, December, 1967.Google Scholar
38. Legg, K. L. C. Towards Integrated Transport Systems. Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Institute of Transportation Sciences, Budapest, June, 1967.Google Scholar
39. Kain, J. F., Meyer, J. R. A First Approximation to a Rand Model for Study of Urban Transportation. RAND Corporation Memo RM 2878, FF, November, 1961.Google Scholar
40. Stratton, A. The Principles and Objectives of Cost- Effectiveness Analysis. Aero JRAeS, Vol 72, No 685, January, 1968.Google Scholar
41. Lennox, S. G. and Tidbury, J. Milton Keynes. An Out line Cost-Benefit Study. College of Aeronautics Memo, No 145. 1967.Google Scholar
42. Richards, B. New Movement in Cities. Studio Vista, Ltd, Highgate Hill, London.Google Scholar
43. Phillips, R. H. The All-Electric New Town. Combustion Engineering Association Conference, Nov, 1966.Google Scholar
44.The year 2000 +, Architectural Design. February, 1967.Google Scholar
45.89th USA Congress. An act to Establish a Department of Transportation. USA Pub Law 89-670, HR 15963, October 15th, 1966.Google Scholar
46. Department of Transport Technology, Loughborough. A Proposal for an Institute of Transport Technology. Loughborough University of Technology, August, 1967.Google Scholar