Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:16:14.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inflight icing data gathering during routine flight operations — a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. P. Brown
A. P. Brown*
Affiliation:
Flight and Fluid EngineeringUK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the purpose of the design and certification of inflight icing protection systems for transport and general aviation aircraft, the eventual re-definition/expansion of the icing environment of FAR 25/JAR 25, Appendix C is under consideration. Such a re-definition will be aided by gathering as much inflight icing event data as reasonably possible, from widely-different geographic locations. The results of a 12-month pilot programme of icing event data gathering are presented. Using non-instrumented turboprop aircraft flying upon mid-altitude routine air transport operations, the programme has gathered observational data from across the British Isles and central France. By observing a number of metrics, notably windscreen lower-corner ice impingement limits, against an opposing corner vortex-flow, supported by wing leading edge impingement limits, the observed icing events have been classified as ‘small’, ‘medium’ or ‘large’ droplet. Using the guidance of droplet trajectory modelling, MVD values for the three droplet size bins have been conjectured to be 15, 40 and 80mm. Hence, the ‘large’ droplet category would be in exceedance of FAR/JAR 25, Appendix C.

Data sets of 117 winter-season and 55 summer-season icing events have been statistically analysed. As defined above, the data sets include 11 winter and five summer large droplet icing encounters. Icing events included ‘sandpaper’ icing from short-duration ‘large’ droplets, and a singular ridge formation icing event in ‘large’ droplet. The frequency of ‘large’ droplet icing events amounted to 1 in 20 flight hours in winter and 1 in 35 flight hours in summer. These figures reflect ‘large’ droplet icing encounter probabilities perhaps substantially greater than previously considered. The ‘large’ droplet events were quite localised, mean scale-size being about 6nm.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1051 , September 2001 , pp. 501 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Proceedings of the FAA International Conference on Aircraft Inflight Icing, I, DOT/FAA/AR-96/81,1, August 1996.Google Scholar
2. Proceedings of the FAA International Conference on Aircraft Inflight Icing, II. DOT/FAA/AR-96/81,11, August 1996.Google Scholar
3. The FAA inflight aircraft icing plan, April 1997.Google Scholar
4. Strapp, J.W., Stuart, R.A. and Isaac, G.A. A Canadian climatology of freezing precipitation and a detailed study using data from St John’s, Newfoundland, Proceedings of the FAA International Conference on Aircraft Inflight Icing, II, DOT/FAA/AR-96/81,11, August 1996.Google Scholar
5. White, F.M. Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
6. Ashendon, R. and Marwitz, J.D. Turboprop aircraft performance response to various environmental conditions, J Aircr, May-June 1997, 35, (3).Google Scholar
6. Ashendon, R. and Marwitz, J.D. Turboprop aircraft performance response to various environmental conditions, J Aircr, May-June 1997, 35, (3).Google Scholar
7. Ashendon, R. and Marwitz, J. Characterising the supercooled large droplet environment with corresponding turboprop aircraft response, J Aircr, November-December 1996, 34, (6).Google Scholar
8. Ashendon, R. and Marwitz, J., Supercooled large droplet distributions in the natural environment and comparison to artificial drizzle from the air force water spray tanker. Proceedings of the FAA International Conference on Aircraft Inflight Icing, II, DOT/FAA/AR-96/81,11, August 1996.Google Scholar
9. Brown, A.P. Analysis of the aerodynamic effects of freezing drizzle in flight icing on a turboprop aircraft, Australian Flight Test Services AFTS 937/02/14/01/SLDFTR, January 1999.Google Scholar
10. Stith, J. et al In situ measurements of aircraft icing, Proceedings of the FAA International Conference on Aircraft Inflight Icing, (II), DOT/FAA/AR-96/81,11, August 1996.Google Scholar
11. Jeck, R.K. Representative values.of icing-related variables aloft in freezing rain and freeing drizzle, Federal Aviation Administration, DOT/FAA/AR-TN95/119, March 1996..Google Scholar
12. Shah, A.D., Patnoe, M.W. and Berg, E.L. Engineering analysis of the atmospheric icing environment including large droplet conditions, Soc of Auto Engineers, 2000-01-2115..Google Scholar
13. Bishop, R. Response to FAA NPRM Docket No 96-NM-21-AD, addressing Icing of Fokker Model F27 Airplanes, letter from Fokker Aircraft, March 1996.Google Scholar