Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T10:40:24.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of non-linear derivative models from Bo 105 flight test data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Rohlfs
M. Rohlfs*
Affiliation:
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) , Institut für Flugmechanik , Braunschweig, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a study focusing on the possibility of identifying nonlinear helicopter models in the time domain. In recent years, identification techniques working mainly in the frequency domain were applied to estimate the parameters in helicopter models. Recently, the time domain identification method of the DLR was improved to allow the identification of fully nonlinear models. To investigate the applicability of this method to helicopters, a nonlinear derivative model with explicit equations for the individual blade flapping angles was formulated. In comparison to the linear derivative models nonlinear models are physically more realistic and are not restricted by small perturbation assumptions. Although a large number of unknowns had to be determined, a nonlinear model was successfully identified.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 102 , Issue 1011 , January 1998 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kaletka, J. and Von Grünhagen, W. Identification of mathematical models for the design of a model following control system, American Helicopter Society 45th Annual Forum, May 1989 and Vertica, 1989, 13, (3).Google Scholar
2. Von Grünhagen, W., Bouwer, G., Pausder, H.-J., Henschel, F. and Kaletka, J. A high bandwidth control system for a helicopter in-flight simulator, Int J Control, 1994, 59, (1).Google Scholar
3. Fu, K.-H. and Kaletka, J. Frequency-domain identification of Bo 105 derivative models with rotor degrees of freedom. 16th European Rotor-craft Forum, Glasgow, UK, 1990 and J Amer Heli Soc, January 1993, 38, (1).Google Scholar
4. Kaletka, J. and Gimonet, B. Identification of extended models from Bo 105 flight test data for hover flight condition. 21st European Rotor-craft Forum, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 1995.Google Scholar
5. Fletcher, J.W. Identification of UH-60 stability derivative models in hover from flight test data, American Helicopter Society 49th Annual Forum, May 1993.Google Scholar
6. Tischler, M.B. System identification methods for aircraft flight control development and validation, NASA TM110369, Army TR-95-A-007, October 1995.Google Scholar
7. Jategaonkar, R.V. User's Manual for NLMLKL, a General FOR TRAN Program for Parameter Estimation in Time Domain. DLR-IB 111-95/03, 1995.Google Scholar
8. Weiß, S. NLHP1L Ein Programm zur Maximum-Likelihood-Parameter-schatzung für nichtlineare Systeme, Benutzeranleitung. DLR-IB 111-87/29, 1987.Google Scholar
9. Hamel, P.G. (Ed) Rotorcraft System Identification. AGARD-LS-178, October 1991.Google Scholar
10. Hamel, P.G. (Ed) Rotorcraft System Identification. AGARD-AR-280, September 1991.Google Scholar
11. Rohlfs, M. Identifizierung von nichtlinearen Derivativ- modellen aus Flugversuchsdaten des Hubschraubers Bo 105. DLR-IB 111-96/17, 1996.Google Scholar
12. Liese, K. Die Anwendbarkeit einfacher Hubschraubermodelle für flug-mechanische Untersuchungen. Dissertation, Institut für Flugmechanik, TU Braunschweig, 1989.Google Scholar