Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:42:11.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypersonic Test Facilities at the Royal Aircraft Establishment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. M. Shaw
J. M. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The existing hypersonic test facilities at the Royal Aircraft Establishment are described. In particular the Hypersonic Tunnel and the Shock Tunnel are considered in some detail from the aspects of design, performance and use, with a view to seeing what lessons can be learned from their construction and operation. The reasons which led to the building of the present facilities are compared with modern ideas for tackling hypersonic research. Consideration of the problems which will require experimental investigation in the future suggest that additional tunnels will be required which, like the Hypersonic Tunnel, will run steadily for periods of seconds rather than for much shorter times. The air supply and power requirements of such tunnels are given and the recent developments in heater design which make their realisation possible are reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 68 , Issue 639 , March 1964 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Crabtree, L. F. and Crane, J. F. W. The 7 in. X 7 in. Hypersonic Wind Tunnel at R.A.E./Farnborough Part I. Design, Instrumentation and Flow Visualisation Techniques. Unpublished M.O.A. Report, September 1960.Google Scholar
2.Crane, J. F. W. Part II. Heater Performance. Unpublished M.O.A. Report, August 1961.Google Scholar
3.Crane, J. F. W. Part III. Calibration of the Flow in the Working Section. Unpublished M.O.A. Report.Google Scholar
4.Crane, J. F. W. and Woodley|J. G. Part IV. Measure- meants of Diffuser Performance, Blockage, Starting Loads and Humidity. M.O.A. Report. To be published.Google Scholar
5.Johnson, J. E. Regenerative Heat Exchangers for Gas Turbines. A.R.C R. & M. 2630, 1952.Google Scholar
6.Woods, B. A. Performance Estimates for the R.A.E. 6 inch High Pressure Shock Tube. Unpublished M.O.A. Report, May 1958.Google Scholar
7.North, R. J. High-Speed Photography Applied to High- Speed Aerodynamics at the National Physical Laboratory. Paper Presented 5th Int. Congress on High-Speed Photography, Washington, D.C., October 1960.Google Scholar
8.Stevens, D. R. A Laboratory Shock Tube for Testing and Calibrating Pressure Transducers and the Results of Tests on Some Commercial and Development Gauges. M.O.A. Report. To be published.Google Scholar
9.Bernstein, L. Notes on Some Experimental and Theoretical Results for the Boundary Layer Development Aft of the Shock in a Shock Tube. A.R.C. Report 22 753, April 1961.Google Scholar
10.Hertzberg, A. The Shock Tunnel and Its Applications to Hypersonic Flight. AGARD Report 144, July 1957.Google Scholar
11.Lukasiewicz, J., Harris, W. G., Jackson, R., Van Der Buck, J. A. and Miller, R. M. Development of Capacitance and Inductance Driven Hotshot Tunnels. Proceedings of the Hypervelocity Techniques Symposium, Denver, October 1960.Google Scholar
12.Cheng, H. K., Hall, J. G., Golian, T. C. and Hertsberg, A. Boundary-layer Displacement and Leading Edge Bluntness Effects in High Temperature Hypersonic Flow. Journal of Aerospace Sciences, May 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shreeve, R. P., Lord, W. T., Boersen, S. J. and Bogdonoff, S. M. A Graphite Resistance Heater for a Hypersonic Wind Tunnel Using Nitrogen. Princeton University Report 560, June 1961.Google Scholar
14.Brown, A. R. G. and Watt, W. The Preparation and Properties of High Temperature Pyrolytic Carbon. Industrial Carbon and Graphite Conference, London, September 1957.Google Scholar
15.Watt, W., Bickerdike, R. L. and Graham, L. W. Reducing the Permeability of Graphite. Engineering, January 1960.Google Scholar
16.Watt, W., Bickerdike, R. L., Brown, A. R. G., Johnson, W. and Hughes, G. Production of Impermeable Graphite. Nuclear Power, February 1959.Google Scholar
17.Lindley, B. C. A Magnetoplasmadynamic Power Generation Experiment. Unpublished Paper Presented at M.H.D. Colloquium, October 1961. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
18.John, R. J. and Bade, W. L. Recent Advances in Electric Arc Plasma Generation Technology. A.R.S. Journal, January 1961.Google Scholar
19.Cann, G. L. Energy Transfer Processes in a Partially Ionised Gas. Guggenheim Aero. Lab. Cal. Inst, of Tech. Memo. 61, June 1961.Google Scholar
20.Reid, J. W. High Pressure Arc Jets. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Paper Number 61-WA>-246.-246.>Google Scholar
21.Shepard, C. E. and Winovich, W. Electric-Arc Jets for Producing Gas Streams With Negligible Contamination. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Paper Number 61-WA-247.Google Scholar
22. Fabri. Les Generateurs de Plasma—ONERA.Google Scholar
23.Lord, W. T. and Shaw, J. M. A Preliminary Study for an Experiment on the Motion of an Electric Arc in a Magnetic Field, at High Pressures. Unpublished M.O.A. Report, December 1961.Google Scholar
24.Shaw, J. M. The Air Supply and Exhaust Services Required by Hypersonic Wind Tunnels and the Limitations These Impose on Tunnel Performance. Unpublished M.O.A. Report, October 1960.Google Scholar