Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:54:24.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A generic control anticipation parameter for aircraft handling qualities evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. Gautrey  and
M. V. Cook
J. E. Gautrey
Affiliation:
Flight Test and Dynamics Group College of AeronauticsCranfield University Bedfordshire, UK
M. V. Cook
Affiliation:
Flight Test and Dynamics Group College of AeronauticsCranfield University Bedfordshire, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The established control anticipation parameter longitudinal handling qualities criterion is based on the assumption that the short term dynamic response of the aeroplane is classical, or second-order-like. Modern fly-by-wire aircraft often have longitudinal short term dynamics which are not second-order-like and to which it is difficult to apply the criterion. This paper presents a proposed generic control anticipation parameter which is a modified version of the control anticipation parameter and which may be applicable to both unaugmented and augmented aircraft of all types. The appropriateness of the modified criterion was illustrated by designing a number of command and stability augmentation control laws, constrained to meet the criterion, for application to a medium weight fly-by-wire civil transport aircraft. The handling characteristics conferred by the control laws were assessed in a series of flight simulator trials, the results of which are briefly presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 102 , Issue 1013 , March 1998 , pp. 151 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ANON Aviation Safety and Pilot Control— Understanding and preventing unfavorable pilot-vehicle interactions, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Favre, C. Fly-by-wire for commercial aircraft: the Airbus experience, Int J Control, 1994, 59, (1).Google Scholar
3. Gautrey, J.E. Generic Regional Aircraft Flying Qualities for the Approach and Landing Task, CoA Report 9701, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, 1997.Google Scholar
4. Bihrle, W. A Handling Qualities Theory for Precise Right Path Control, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-65-198, 1966.Google Scholar
5. Cook, M.V. Flight Dynamics Principles, Edward Arnold, London, 1997.Google Scholar
6. ANON Design and Airworthiness requirements for Service Aircraft, Defence Standard 00-970/Issue 1, Volume 1, Book 2, Part 6 — Aerodynamics, Flying Qualities and Performance, Ministry of Defence, UK, 1983.Google Scholar
7. ANON Military Specification — Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, MIL-F-8785C, Department of Defense, USA, 1980.Google Scholar
8. Hoh, R.H., Mitchell, D.G., Ashkenas, I.L., Klein, R.H., Heffley, R.K. and Hodgkinson, J. Proposed MIL Standard and Handbook — Flying Qualities of Air Vehicles, Volume II: Proposed MIL Handbook, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratory, Technical Report AFWAL-TR-82-3081, Vol II, 1982.Google Scholar
9. ANON Military Standard — Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, MIL-STD-1797A (USAF). Department of Defense, USA, 1987. (Restricted)Google Scholar
10. Harris, T.M., Chalk, C.R. and Neal, T.P. Background Information and Users Guide for MIL-F-8785B(ASG), Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-69-72, 1969.Google Scholar
11. Chalk, C.R. Revisions of MIL-F-8785B(ASG) Proposed by Cornell Aeronautical Labs, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-72-41, 1973.Google Scholar
12. Neal, T.P. and Smith, R.E. An In-Flight Investigation to Develop Control System Design Criteria for Fighter Airplanes, Technical Report AFFDL-TR-70-74, 1973.Google Scholar
13. Moou, H.A., de Boer, W.P. and van Gool, M.F.C. Determination of Low Speed Longitudinal Manoeuvring Criteria for Transport Aircraft with Advanced Flight Control Systems, NLR, Technical report TR-79127U, 1979.Google Scholar
14. Moou, H.A. Criteria for Low-Speed Longitudinal Handling Qualities of Transport Aircraft with Closed-Loop Flight Control Systems, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985.Google Scholar
15. Rossitto, K.F., Hodgkinson, J., Williams, T.M., Leggett, D.B., Bailey, R.E. and Ohmit, E. Initial result of an in-flight investigation of longitudinal flying qualities for augmented large transports in approach and landing, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Monterey, California, Paper No AIAA 93-3816, 1993.Google Scholar
16. Field, E.J. Flying Qualities of Transport Aircraft: Precognitive or Compensatory? Cranfield University, College of Aeronautics PhD thesis, 1995.Google Scholar
17. Gibson, J.C. The Definition, Understanding and Design of Aircraft Handling Qualities, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Report LR-756, 1995.Google Scholar
18. ANON Federal Aviation Regulations-Part 25, Subpart B-Flight, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation.Google Scholar