Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:49:45.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Free-Jet Testing of a Supersonic Engine/Intake Combination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. P. Morriss
Affiliation:
British Aircraft Corporation (Filton Division)
D. D. Williams
Affiliation:
Rolls-Royce Ltd (Bristol Engine Division)

Extract

The design and development of aircraft powerplants for sustained supersonic operation proves to be an exacting task which involves careful balancing of the requirements for high installed performance and system viability. The latter question may be dominated by the need to ensure flow compatibility at the intake/engine interface.

Type
Symposium on Altitude Testing
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Johnson, P. J. Olympus in Concorde. The Tools of Development. AIAA/RAeS/CASI 10th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Los Angeles, California, 18th–l20th October 1967 (AIAA 67–753).Google Scholar
2. Rettie, I. H. and Lewis, W. G. E. Design and Development of an Air Intake for a Supersonic Transport Aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 5, No 6, November-December 1968.Google Scholar
3. Young, P. Propulsion Controls on the Concorde. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 70, No 669, September 1966.Google Scholar
4. Ashwood, P. F. Intake/Engine Compatibility at Supersonic Speeds. A Résumé of Tests made in the NGTE Test Facility on the Concorde Powerplant. Paper written for presentation at the 9th Annual Conference on Environmental Effects on Aircraft and Propulsion Systems. Bordentown, NJ, 7th to 9th October 1969.Google Scholar
5. Ashwood, P. F. The Design and Development of a Large Supersonic Free-Jet Test Cell. Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society. Vol 74. No 711, March 1970.Google Scholar