Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:05:44.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation flight investigation for highly efficient future civil transport aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

G.J. Durango ,
C. Lawson  and
A.Z. Shahneh
G.J. Durango
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, CranfieldUK
C. Lawson*
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, CranfieldUK
A.Z. Shahneh
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, CranfieldUK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Formation flight could greatly assist the air transport industry in tackling the challenges of environmental impact, excessive reliance on fuel and overcapacity. Previous studies have shown drag reductions leading to significant fuel savings for aircraft in formation relative to their solo flight. Safety is guaranteed with the use of extended formation distances, and practical implementation issues could be solved in the near future. Since studies so far have focused on existing aircraft configurations and technology, a case study using a strut-braced wing airliner was carried out to ascertain its applicability to less conventional craft. The present results did not indicate such clear-cut benefits. If formation flight is to be successful and beneficial for the next generations of aircraft, it will be vital to consider its interaction with new technologies developed for highly efficient operation, in particular those aimed at reduction of aircraft drag such as laminar flow, and to do so early in the design of aerospace vehicles and wider systems.

Keywords

Extended formation flightunconventional airlinernatural laminar flow
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 120 , Issue 1229 , July 2016 , pp. 1081 - 1100
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Penner, J.E, Lister, D.H., Griggs, D.J., Dokken, D.J. and McFarland, M.Aviation and the global atmosphere: A special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, IPCC in Collaboration with the Scientific Assessment Panel to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
2.US Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2014, Office of Communications, 2014, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
3.Brownbridge, G., Azadi, P., Smallbone, A., Bhave, A., Taylor, B. and Kraft, M.The future viability of algae-derived biodiesel under economic and technical uncertainties, J. Bioresource Technology, January 2014, 151, pp 166–173.Google Scholar
4.Airbus. Global market forecast 2013–2032, 2013, Airbus S.A.S., Blagnac, France.Google Scholar
5.Budd, L., Griggs, S., and Howarth, D.Sustainable aviation futures: Crises, contested realities and prospects for change, Transport and Sustainability, 2013, 4, pp 3–35.Google Scholar
6.Lissaman, P. B. S. and Shollenberger, C. A.Formation flight of birds, Science, May 1970, 168, (3934), pp 1003–1005.Google Scholar
7.Weimerskirch, H., Martin, J., Clerquin, Y., Alexandre, P. and Jiraskova, S.Energy saving in flight formation, Nature, October 2001, 413, (6857), pp 697–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Ning, S.A. Aircraft Drag Reduction through Extended Formation Flight, 2011, PhD dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics of Stanford University, Stanford, California, US.Google Scholar
9.Frota, J.NACRE novel aircraft concepts. The Aeronautical J., June 2010, 114, (1156), pp 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Greitzer, E.M., Bonnefoy, P.A., De la Rosa Blanco, E., Dorbian, C.S., Drela, M., Hall, D.K., Hansman, R.J., Hileman, J.I., Liebeck, R.H., Lovegren, J., Mody, P., Pertuze, J.A., Sato, S., Spakovszky, Z.S., Tan, C.S., Hollman, J.S., Duda, J.E., Fitzgerald, N., Houghton, J., Kerrebrock, J.L., Kiwada, G.F., Kordonowy, D., Parrish, J.C., Tylko, J., Wen, E.A. and Lord, W.K. N+3 Aircraft Concept Designs and Trade Studies, Final Report, Volume 1, NASA/CR-2010-216794, 2010, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, US.Google Scholar
11.Bertin, J.J. and Cummings, R.M.Aerodynamics for Engineers, 5th ed, 2008, Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, US.Google Scholar
12.Ray, R.J., Cobleigh, B.R., Vachon, M.J. and John, C. St. Flight test techniques used to evaluate performance benefits during formation flight, NASA/TP-2002-210730, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kless, J.E., Aftosmis, M.J., Ning, S.A. and Nemec, M.Inviscid analysis of extended-formation flight, AIAA J., July 2013, 51, (7), pp 1703–1715.Google Scholar
14.Bower, G.C., Flanzer, T.C. and Kroo, I.M. Formation geometries and route optimization for commercial formation flight, AIAA 2009–3615, 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 22-25 June 2009, San Antonio, US.Google Scholar
15.Ning, S.A., Flanzer, T.C. and Kroo, I.M.Aerodynamic performance of extended formation flight, J. Aircraft, May-June 2011, 48, (3), pp 855–865.Google Scholar
16.Hummel, D. The use of aircraft wakes to achieve power reductions in formation flight, AGARD Conference Proceedings 584, NATO, AGARD Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium on “The Characteristics & Modification of Wakes from Lifting Vehicles in Fluids”, 20-23 May 1996, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
17.Bieniawski, S.R., Clark, R.W., Rosenzweig, S.E. and Blake, W.B. Summary of flight testing and results for the formation flight for aerodynamic benefit program, AIAA 2014-1457, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13-17 January 2014, National Harbor, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
18.Haalas, D.J., Bieniawski, S.R., Whitehead, B.T., Flanzer, T. and Blake, W.B. Formation flight for aerodynamic benefit simulation development and validation, AIAA 2014-1459, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13-17 January 2014, National Harbor, Maryland, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Flanzer, T.C., Bieniawski, S.R. and Blake, W.B. Operational analysis for the formation flight for aerodynamic benefit program, AIAA 2014-1460, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13-17 January 2014, National Harbor, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
20.Pahle, J., Berger, D., Venti, M.W., Faber, J.J., Duggan, C. and Cardinal, K. A preliminary flight investigation of formation flight for drag reduction on the C-17 aircraft, NASA DFRC-E-DAA-TN4717, 2013, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Federal Aviation Administration. FAR part 91 – general operating and flight rules, Federal Regulations, Title 14 –Aeronautics and Space, Vol.2, Chapter I, Subchapter F – Air Traffic and General Operating Rules, 2013, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
22.International Civil Aviation Organization. RVSM Separation for RVSM compliant aircraft operating in formation flights, 15th Meeting of the APANPIRG ATM/AIS/SAR Sub-Group, 25-29 July 2005, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
23.Eurocontrol Statfor. Seven-year IFR Flight Movements and Service Units Forecast: 2013–2019, ed. 1.0, 2013.Google Scholar
24.Xu, J., Ning, S.A., Bower, G. and Kroo, I.M. Aircraft route optimization for heterogeneous formation flight, AIAA 2012-1524, 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 23-26 April 2012, Honolulu, Hawaii, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Durango, G.Flight path performance of the AT-13 aircraft, School of Engineering, 2014, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.Google Scholar
26.Eshelby, M.E. Aircraft Performance – Theory and Practice, 2000, Elsevier, London, UK.Google Scholar
27.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and United States Air Force. U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, NASA-TM-X-7433b, NASA, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
28.ESDU. Item 78008: Physical properties of design atmospheres, IHS (1st issued 1978), 1992.Google Scholar
29.Hoerner, S.F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag, 1965, Bricktown, New Jersey, US.Google Scholar
30.Fink, R. USAF Stability and Control DATCOM, AFWAL-TR-83-3048, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Douglas Aircraft Division, for the Flight Controls Division, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, April 1978, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, US.Google Scholar
31.Drela, M. and Youngren, H. AVL-Aerodynamic Analysis, Trim Calculation, Dynamic Stability Analysis, Aircraft Configuration Development, Overview, 2014. Available online from: web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/avl/ [Last accessed: 26/12/2014].Google Scholar
32.Torenbeek, E. Advanced Aircraft Design: Conceptual Design, Analysis and Optimisation of Subsonic Civil Airplanes, 2013, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
33.Moler, C. Numerical Computing with MATLAB, Web edition version, 2004. Available online from: www.mathworks.co.uk/moler/chapters.html. [Last accessed 26/12/2014].Google Scholar
34.Slotnick, J.P., Clark, R.W., Friedman, D.M., Yadlin, Y., Yeh, D.T., Carr, J.E., Czech, M.J. and Bieniawski, S.W. Computational aerodynamic analysis for the formation flight for aerodynamic benefit program, AIAA 2014-1458, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 13-17 January 2014, National Harbor, Maryland, US.Google Scholar
35.Gubisch, M.Go with the flow, Flight Int. Magazine, July 26–Aug. 1, 2011, 180, (5301), pp 24–26.Google Scholar
36.Dautriat, E. Clean Sky: Bringing sustainable air transport closer, “Innovation for sustainable aviation in a global environment”, Proceedings of the Sixth European Aeronautics Days (30 March - 1 April 2011, Madrid, Spain), 2012, IOS Press, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
37.Morscheck, F. Analyses on an air to air refueling network in a traffic simulation, 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 7-12 September 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
38.Felder, J.L., Kim, H.D. and Brown, G.V. Turboelectric distributed propulsion engine cycle analysis for hybrid-wing-body aircraft, AIAA 2009-1132, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida, US.Google Scholar