Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:45:08.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow Studies of the Leading Edge Stall on a Swept-Back Wing at High Incidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Joseph Black*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Bristol

Summary

The flow separation on a swept-back wing with 44 degrees leading edge sweep at 18 degrees incidence has been investigated by means of detailed pressure distribution measurements over the leading edge, boundary layer flow determination with liquid film technique, and yawmeter traverses. A wool-tuft grid was also used, and a spin detector was developed to search for regions of vorticity. These tests established that the flow separates on the leading edge; over the inboard sections it re-attaches behind a “ short” separation bubble, while outboard it only re-attaches near the trailing edge, thus forming a “ long ” separation bubble, or else fails to attach. The separated flow in what has been commonly called the tip stall does in fact take the form of a “ ram's horn “ vortex with the origin, or “ tip,” located at the junction of the two bubbles on the leading edge. The vortex lies outwards across the wing surface at approximately 20 to 25 degrees to the line-of-flight before curving aft to be shed into the wake, where it extends almost from mid semi-span to the wing tip. This vortex induces considerable changes in flow direction, both on and over the wing, and also in the wake. Thus in the wake a maximum downwash of 23 degrees is induced aft of the mid semi-span, and there is an upwash of 17 degrees at the outer edge of the vortex, almost aft of the tip. A good correlation between yawmeter results and the boundary layer flow direction indications from the liquid film technique was obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jones, B. M. (1934). Stalling. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 38, p. 760, 1934.Google Scholar
2. McCullough, G. B. (1951). Examples of Three Representative Types of Airfoil Section Stall at Low Speed. N.A.C.A. Technical Note 2502, September 1951.Google Scholar
3. Black, J. and Hunt, R. D. (1953). Some Measurements of Leading Edge Separation Bubbles on a 10 per cent. Thick Symmetrical Aerofoil. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, p. 819, December 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Black, J. (1953). Pressure Distribution and Boundary Layer Investigations on a 44 degree Swept-back Tapered Wing. A.R.C. Current Paper No. 137, 1953.Google Scholar
5. Küchemann, D. (1953). Types of Flow on Swept Wings. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Nov. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Bird, J. D. and Riley, D. R. (1952). Some Experiments on Visualisation of Flow Fields behind Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings by means of a Tuft Grid. N.A.C.A. Technical Note 2674, May 1952.Google Scholar
7. Black, J. (1952). A Note on the Vortex Patterns in the Boundary Layer of a Swept-back Wing. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, April 1952.Google Scholar
8. Brebner, G. G. (1952). Pressure and Boundary Layer Measurements on a 59 degree Swept-back Wing at Low Speed. A.R.C. Current Paper No. 86, 1952.Google Scholar
9. Emslie, K., Hosking, L. and Marshall, W. S. D. (1953). Some Experiments on the Flow in the Boundary Layer of a 45 degree Swept-back Untapered Wing of Aspect Ratio 4. College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, Report 69, Feb. 1953.Google Scholar
10. Lambourne, N. C. and Pusey, P. S. (1955). Some Visual Observations of the Flow over a Swept-back Wing in a Water Tunnel, with Particular Reference to High Incidences. A.R.C. Current Paper No. 192, 1955.Google Scholar