Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:07:24.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flight efficiency analysis on the Multi-Arrival Route Point Merge System

Part of: Written Paper Prizes 2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

A. Oren Open the ORCID record for A. Oren [Opens in a new window]  and
O. Sahin Open the ORCID record for O. Sahin [Opens in a new window]
A. Oren*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Department of Air Traffic Control, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir, Turkey
O. Sahin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics Department of Air Traffic Control, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study proposes a new operational concept of the Point Merge System, called Multi-Arrival Route Point Merge System (MAR-PMS), which is an air traffic control method used to sequence aircraft arrivals in a given terminal control area. The proposed concept enables the additional arrival routes that have an angular difference to each sequencing leg. Furthermore, a time-indexed 0-1 linear programming model is formulated. The obtained results are validated in a real time simulation. The comparison results of PMS and MAR-PMS show that the average reduction of 19% of total flight time, 23% of total flight distance, and 19% in total fuel burned and reduction in CO2 emissions in favor of a proposed concept.

Keywords

Air traffic managementPoint merge systemAircraft scheduling/sequencingFlight efficiency0-1 linear programming
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 126 , Issue 1299 , May 2022 , pp. 755 - 767
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

EUROCONTROL. Point Merge Implementation – A Quick Guide, 2020.Google Scholar
Brentnall, A. and Cheng, R. Some effects of aircraft arrival sequence algorithms, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 2009, 60, pp 962–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sölveling, G. and Clarke, J.P. Scheduling of airport runway operations using stochastic branch and bound methods, Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol., 2014, 45, pp 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, R.G. The Dynamic Scheduling of Aircraft in the Near Terminal Area. MIT Flight Transportation Laboratory Report R76-9 (Boston), 1976.Google Scholar
Dear, R.G. and Sherif, Y.S. An algorithm for computer assisted sequencing and scheduling of terminal area operations, Transp. Res. Part A General, 1991, 25, (2–3), pp 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psaraftis, H.N. A dynamic programming approach for sequencing groups of identical jobs, Oper. Res., 1980, 28, (6), pp 1347–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, F. and Erzberger, H. Analysis of Sequencing and Scheduling Methods for Arrival Traffic, NASA Technical Memorandum, 1990.Google Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, C.S., Barnett, A. and Odoni, A.R. Landings at logan airport: describing and increasing airport capacity, Transp. Sci., 1993, 27, (3), pp 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivizas, D Optimal scheduling with Maximum Position Shift (MPS) constraints: a runway scheduling application, J. Navig., 1998, 51, (2), pp 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, H. and Chandran, B.G. Algorithms for scheduling runway operations under constrained position shifting, Oper. Res., 2010, 58, (6), pp 1650–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y., Choi, B., Lee, S., Lee, K. and Kim, Y. Optimal and practical aircraft sequencing and scheduling for point merge system, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2017, 50, (1), pp 14644–14649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Hong, Y. and Kim, Y. Optimal scheduling algorithm in point merge system including holding pattern based on mixed-integer linear programming, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerospace Eng., 2019, 233, (2).Google Scholar
Qi, Y., Wang, X. and Chen, C. Research on arrival integration method for point merge system in tactical operation, Combinatorial Optimization and Applications 2017 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2017, pp 417–425.Google Scholar
Christien, R., Hoffman, E., Trzmiel, A. and Zeghal, K. Toward the characterisation of sequencing arrivals, The 12th USA/EUROPE Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar 2017 (Seattle, Washington), 2017.Google Scholar
Toratani, D. and Itoh, E. Merging Optimization Method Considering Minimum Time Separation Based on Wake Turbulence Category, 2018. doi:10.2514/6.2018-1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, M., Delahaye, D. and Marechal, P. A framework of point merge-based autonomous system for optimizing aircraft scheduling in busy TMA, The 5th SESAR Innovation Days 2015 (Bologna), 2015.Google Scholar
Sahin, O. and Usanmaz, O. Arrival traffic sequence for converging runways, Sustainable Aviation, Springer, 2016, pp 291–296.Google Scholar
Usanmaz, O., Sınar, G. and Sahin, O. An assessment of a proposed arrival route model in terminal airspace, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerospace Eng., 2019, 233, (11), pp 4032–4038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) (2009) Doc.9905 Required Navigation Performance Authorization Required (RNP AR) Procedure Design Manual. Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) (2016) Doc. 4444 Procedures for Air Navigation Services, Air Traffic Management. Google Scholar
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. (2020). EUROCONTROL European Route Network Improvement Plan - PART 2 European ATS Route Network - Version 2020-2024. Google Scholar
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. (2017). EUROCONTROL User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Version 3.14. Google Scholar
Anderson, B.E., Chen, G. and Blake, D.R. Hydrocarbon emissions from a modern commercial airline, J. Atmos. Environ., 2006, 40, (19), pp 3601–3612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormhoudt, J., Herndon, S.C., Yelvington, P.E., Miake-Lye, R. and Wey, C. Nitrogen oxide (NO/NO2/HONO) emissions measurements in aircraft exhausts, J. Propul. Power, 2007, 23, pp 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar