Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:12:01.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finite element solution of the transonic full-potential equation for the flow past axisymmetric configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. C. Mehta
Affiliation:
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum — 695022, India
T. Jayachandran
Affiliation:
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum — 695022, India

Abstract

A finite element method is used for the solution of the full-potential equation in conservation of mass form. The finite element analysis allows the boundary conditions to be treated in simple and exact manner, without the use of a mapping scheme. An efficient finite element computational grid is employed in order to obtain an accurate converged solution. An iterative method is used to solve the full-potential equation. The iteration is in two parts, new values for the velocity potential are found by matrix inversion while the density is not updated, then new values of the density are found from the isentropic relation. The density field is then relaxed using new values for the potential in conjunction with an artificial viscosity. Results are obtained for different types of axisymmetric configurations. Comparison is made with available experimental data and good agreement is found for the pressure coefficient distribution over a suitable blunted cone-cylinder axisymmetric body. Further comparisons with experimental data are required in order to assess the method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Garabedian, P. Nonparametric solutions of the Euler Equa¬tions for steady flow, Commun Pure Appl Math, 1983, 36, 529535.Google Scholar
2. Murman, E. M. and Cole, J. D. Calculation of plane steady transonic flows, AIAA J, 1971, 9, (1), 114121.Google Scholar
3. SouthJR, C. J. JR, C. J. and Jameson, A. Relaxation solution for inviscid axisymmetric transonic flow over blunt or pointed bodies, AIAA CFD conference at Palm Spring, California, 1973.Google Scholar
4. Purvis, J. W. and Burkhalter, J. E. Prediction of critical Mach number of store configurations, AIAA J, 1979, 17, (11), 11701177.Google Scholar
5. Chow, W. L., Bober, L. J. and Anderson, B. H. Numerical Calculation of Transonic Boattail Flow, NASA TND 7984, 1975.Google Scholar
6. Bailey, F. R. Numerical Calculation of Transonic Flow About Slender Bodies of Revolution, NASA TND 6582, 1971.Google Scholar
7. Deconinck, H. and Hirsch, C. Transonic flow calculations with finite elements, GAMM Workshop on transonic flow calculations with Shocks, Stockholm, 1978.Google Scholar
8. Ecer, A. and Akay, H. U. Finite Element Analysis of Transonic Flows in Cascades-Importance of Computational Grids in Improving Accuracy and Convergence, NASA CR 3446, 1981.Google Scholar
9. Chima, R. V. and Gerhart, P. M. Finite element analysis of inviscid subsonic boattail flow, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (2), 190195.Google Scholar
10. Whitehead, D. S. and Newton, S. G. A finite element method for the solution of two-dimensional transonic flows in cascades, Int J Num Meth Fluids, 1985, 5, 115132.Google Scholar
11. Jayachandran, T., Mehta, R. C, Bhanu, W. and Lakshmi-Narayanan, . Numerical solution of full-potential and Euler equations, in Proceedings of 16th National Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power Conference, December 1988. HBTI, Kanpur.Google Scholar
12. Mehta, R. C, Kishorilal and Jayachandran, T. Effect of computational parameters on the results of axisymmetric transonic flow, paper presented in 4th National Conference on Aerodynamics at IIT, Madras in December 1988.Google Scholar
13. Varambally, B. S. Private Communication, 1986Google Scholar