Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:19:07.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of pitching rotation on aerodynamics of tandem flapping wing sections of a hovering dragonfly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

E. M. Elarbi  and
N. Qin
E. M. Elarbi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
N. Qin
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies hovering capability of flapping two-dimensional tandem wing sections inspired by a real dragonfly wing configuration and kinematics. Based on unsteady numerical simulations, the dragonfly corrugated wings have been benchmarked against a flat wing in terms of the aerodynamic forces and flow structures generated during a flapping cycle. The timing of rotation at each stroke is studied by pitch rotation at three different rates, i.e., 80%, 60% and 40% of a flapping period. The results suggest that the longer time pitch rotation with the period of 80% of the overall flapping period is closer to the force calculations obtained of a balanced flight, that is, the mean vertical force supports the dragonfly weight of 0.754 g with a small difference of 0.92% and the mean horizontal force indicates negligible thrust. However, the corrugated wing performs aerodynamically differently from the flat plate with differences in and in by ±2.06% for the corrugated shape. The vorticity flow field for both wings have been recorded at some instants of flapping motions which give more explanation of such dissimilarity.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1161 , November 2010 , pp. 699 - 710
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ansari, S., Zbikowski, R. and Knowles, K.. Non-linear unsteady aerodynamic model for insect-like flapping wings in the hover, Part 1: methodology and analysis, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aero Eng, 2006, 220, (2), pp 61–83.Google Scholar
2. Dickinson, M.H. and Gotz, K.G.. Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds regime, J Exp Biology, 1993, 174, pp 45–64.Google Scholar
3. Ellington, C.P.. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles, J Exp Biology, 1999, 202, (23), pp 3439–3448.Google Scholar
4. Ho, S., Nassef, H., Pornsinsirirak, N., Tai, Y.C. and Ho, C.M.. Unsteady aerodynamics and flow control for flapping wing flyers, Progress in Aerospace Sci, 2003, 39, pp 635–681.Google Scholar
5. Ellington, C.P., Van Den Berg, C., Willmott, A.P. and Thomas, A. L.R.. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight, Nature, 1996, 384, (6610), pp 626–630.Google Scholar
6. Ansari, S., Zbikowski, R. and Knowles, K.. Non-linear unsteady aerodynamic model for insect-like flapping wings in the hover. part 2: implementation and validation, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aero Eng, 2006, 220, (3), pp 169–186.Google Scholar
7. Sane, S.P.. The aerodynamics of insect flight, J Exp Biology, 2003, 206, (23), pp 4191–4208.Google Scholar
8. Wang, Z.J.. Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight (a), J Fluid Mech, 2000, 410, pp 323–341.Google Scholar
9. Zbikowski, R., Knowles, K., Pedersen, C.B. and Galinski, C.. Some aeromechanical aspects of insect-like flapping wings in hover, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: J Aero Eng, 2004, 218, (6), pp 389–398.Google Scholar
10. Elarbi, E.M. and Qin, N.. Simulation of flow around a flapping dragonfly wing section in hover, European Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Flight Competition (EMAV 2008), 2008, Braunschweig, Germany Google Scholar
11. Ellington, C.P.. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight I-VI, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 1984, 305, (1122), pp 1–181.Google Scholar
12. McMichael, J.M. and Francis, M.S., Micro air vehicles — toward a new dimension in flight, 2005.Google Scholar
13. Savage, S.B., Newman, B.G. and Wong, D.T.M.. The role of vortices and unsteady effects during the hovering flight of dragonflies, J Exp Biology, 1979, 83, (1), pp 59–77.Google Scholar
14. Tamai, M., Wang, Z., Rajagopalan, G., Hu, H. and He, G.. Aerodynamic performance of a corrugated dragonfly airfoil compared with smooth airfoils at low Reynolds numbers, 2007, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, Reno, Nevada.Google Scholar
15. Wang, Z.J.. Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering (b), Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85, (10), pp 2216–2219.Google Scholar
16. Bergou, A.J., Xu, S. and Wang, Z.J.. Passive wing pitch reversal in insect flight, J Fluid Mech, 2007, 591, pp 321–337.Google Scholar
17. Schlichting, H., Boundary-Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
18. Wang, K.J. and Sun, M.. A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight, J Exp Biology, 2005, 208, pp 3785–3804.Google Scholar
19. Gorissen, D., Hendrickx, W., Crombecq, K. and Dhaene, T.. Integrating gridcomputing and metamodeling, 2006, Sixth IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid 2006), Singapore.Google Scholar