Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:14:39.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developments in Range Instrumentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. A. Harrison
J. E. A. Harrison*
Affiliation:
RAE, Aberporth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Developments in Range instrumentation for trajectory measurement over the past ten years are reviewed, and some possible future developments discussed. Instrumentation systems considered include kine-theodolites, tracking radars, multi-station Doppler systems and interferometers. Some common sources of error are discussed; it is shown that atmospheric retraction variations may be the limiting factor on the accuracy of modern trajectory measuring systems.

The most important problems during the next five years will arise from requirements for very low level weapon systems, high precision tracking of small targets with fast response characteristics and long range high precision tracking of space vehicles. Developments to meet these requirements will lead to further requirements for completely automatic data processing for the high data rates needed. It seems probable that fewer completely new instrumentation systems will be developed during the next five years, more attention being given to reducing the size of airborne transponders and other equipment and increasing the reliability and accuracy of existing equipment. Systems using a common carrier lor telemetry signals and tracking may appear.

Considerable work on isolating sources of error in existing systems and reducing them is going on and will continue. This will be combined with more advanced post-flight analysis techniques during the next five years.

Type
Astronautics and Guided flight Section
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 671 , November 1966 , pp. 987 - 996
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Speer, Fridtjof A. Trends in space-vehicle test ranges. Astronautics and Aeronautics, July 1964.Google Scholar
2.Mason, J. F.Modernizing the missile range Parts 1 and 2. Electronics Vol. 38 Nos. 4 and 5, March 1 & 8 1965.Google Scholar
3.Hewitt, J.An f/1 Field Flattened Schmidt System for Precision Measurement of Satellite Positions. Photographic Science and Engineering Vol. 9 No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1965.Google Scholar
4.Barton, D. K. The future of pulse radar for missile and space range instrumentation. I.R.E. Trans MIL 5 p. 330, October 1961.Google Scholar
5.Glazier, E. V. D.Radar—present position and future trends. Electronics and Power Vol 11, June 1965.Google Scholar
6.Benjamin, R.Recent developments in radar modulation and processing techniques. Proc I.E.E. Vol. 111, No. 12, December 1964.Google Scholar
7.Milne, K.The Economics of Ground Stations. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society Vol. 66 p. 360, 1962.Google Scholar
8.Pressey, B. G.Radio tracking of artificial earth satellites. Journal Brit. I.R.E. Vol. 22, 1961.Google Scholar
9.Mengel, J. T.Tracking the earth satellite and data transmission by radio. Proc I.R.E. Vol. 44 p. 755, 1956.Google Scholar
10.Woodring, Marvin J. (Ed). AFMTC Report No. MTC- TDR-64-5, April 1964. A Compilation of Papers presented at the Fifth Joint AFMTC/Range User Data Conference.Google Scholar
11.Thompson, M. C., JANES, H. B. and Kirkpatrick, R. W.Variations in Tropospheric Refractive Index and Ap parent Radio Path Length. Journal of Geophysics Re search Vol. 65 p. 193, January 1960.Google Scholar