Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:12:01.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of fixed wing micro air vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

P. Cosyn  and
J. Vierendeels
P. Cosyn
Affiliation:
Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Belgium
J. Vierendeels
Affiliation:
Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper describes the methodology and computational design strategies used to develop a series of fixed wing micro air vehicles (MAVs) at the Ghent University. The emphasis of the research is to find an optimal MAV-platform that is bound to geometrical constraints but superior in its performance. This requires a multidisciplinary design optimisation but the challenges are mainly of aerodynamic nature. Key areas are endurance, stability, controllability, manoeuvrability and component integration. The highly three-dimensional low Reynolds number flow, the lack of experimental databases and analytical or empirical models of MAV-aerodynamics required fundamental research of the phenomena. This includes the use of a vortex lattice method, three-dimensional CFD-computations and a numerical propeller optimisation method to derive the forces and their derivatives of the MAV and propeller for performance and stability-related optimisation studies. The design method leads to a simple, stable and robust flying wing MAV-platform that has the agility of a fighter airplane. A prototype, the UGMAV25, was constructed and flight tests were performed. The capabilities of the MAV were tested in a series of successful flight manoeuvres. The UGMAV15, a MAV with a span of 15cm, is also developed to test flight-qualities and endurance at this small scale. With the current battery technology, a flight-time of at least one hour is expected.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1119 , May 2007 , pp. 315 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McMichael, J., Micro Air Vehicles, 1998, DARPA briefing at the DUSD (S&T) Seminar on Emerging Technologies: Micro Air Vehicles, 11 December 1998, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
2. Grasmeyer, J.M. and Keennon, M.T., AeroVironment, Inc. Development of the Black Widow micro air vehicle, 2001, AIAA-2001-0127, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, 8-11 January 2001, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
3. Kellogg, J. ET AL The NRL Mite air vehicle, 2001, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Unmanned Air Vehicle Systems, Bristol, UK, pp 25-1-25-14.Google Scholar
4. Ifju, P.G., Jenkins, D.A., Ettinger, S., Lian, Y., Shyy, W. and Waszak, M.R, Flexible-wing-based Micro Air Vehicles, 2992, AIAA-2002-705, 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition, 14-17 January 2002, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
5. Shyy, W., Berg, M. and Ljungqvist, D., Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles, Progress in Aerospace Sci, 1999, 36, pp 455–505.Google Scholar
6. Bohorquez, F., Rankins, F. and Baeder, J., Hover performance of rotor blades at low Reynolds numbers for rotary wing micro air vehicles, an experimental and CFD study, 2003, AIAA-2003-3930, 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 23-26 June 2003, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
7. Selig, M.S., Summary of Low-Speed Aerofoil Data (Vol 1-3), 1997, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Soartech Publications, Virginia Beach, VA.Google Scholar
8. Melin, T., A vortex lattice MATLAB implementation for linear aerodynamic wing applications, TORNADO release 1.23b, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
9. Cosyn, P. and Vierendeels, J., Numerical investigation of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers, J Aircr, 2006, 43, (3), pp 713–722.Google Scholar
10. Mueller, T.J., Aerodynamic measurements at low Reynolds numbers for fixed wing micro aerial vehicles, 1999, RTO AVT/VKI Special Course on Development and Operation of UAVs for Military and Civil Applications, 13-17 September 1999, VKI, Belgium.Google Scholar
11. Torres, G.E. and Mueller, T.J. University of Notre Dame, Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J, 2004, 42, (5), pp 865–873.Google Scholar
12. Polhamus, E.C., Predictions of vortex-lift characteristics by a leading-edge-suction analogy, J Aircr, 1971, 8, (4), pp 193–199.Google Scholar
13. Lamar, J.E., Extension of leading-edge-suction analogy to wings with separated flow around the side edges at subsonic speeds, 1974, NASA TR R-428.Google Scholar
14. Hoerner, S.F. and Borst, H.V., Fluid-dynamic lift, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1975, Chapter 9 and Chapter 17, Brick Town, NJ.Google Scholar
15. Campbell, J.P. and McKinney, O.M., Summary of methods for calculating dynamic lateral stability and response and for estimating lateral stability derivatives, 1951, NACA Technical Note 2409.Google Scholar
16. Betz, A. with appendix by Prandtl, L., Screw Propellers with Minimum Energy Loss, 1919, pp 193–213, Gottingen Reports.Google Scholar
17. Larrabee, E., Practical design of minimum induced loss propellers, April 1979, Society of Automotive Engineers, Business Aircraft Meeting and Exposition, Wichita, KS.Google Scholar
18. Adkins, C.N. and Liebeck, RH. Design of optimum propellers, J Propulsion and Power, 1994, 10, (5), pp 676–682.Google Scholar
19. Chattot, J-J., Optimization of propellers using helicoidal vortex model, Computational Fluid Dynamics J, 2002, 10, (4), pp 429–438.Google Scholar
20. Goldstein, S., On the vortex theory of screw propellers, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1929, Series A, 123, pp 440–465.Google Scholar
21. Ribner, H.S., Propellers in yaw, 1945, NACA report 820.Google Scholar
22. Lowry, J.G. and Polhamus, E.C., A method for predicting lift increments due to flap deflection at low angles of attack in incompressible flow, 1957, NACA Technical Note 3911.Google Scholar
23. Rauw, M., FDC 1.3 – A Simulink/Matlab Toolbox for Fight Dynamics and Control Analysis, 2002, Dutchroll Software.Google Scholar